Re: AS47860 - 93.175.240.0/20 - Wiskey Tango Foxtrot

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > > > P.S. This crap appears to be be brought to us courtesy of AS29632, > NetAssist, LLC: > > http://new.netassist.ua/ > > So anyway, where are the grownups? > clearly whomever provides transit to

AS47860 - 93.175.240.0/20 - Wiskey Tango Foxtrot

My analysis: Serious and apparently long-lived bogosity, with a clear history of substantial spamming aactivity. But you be the judge. Looks to me like an unregistered RIPE AS announcing a route to a /20 worth of unregistered RIPE IPv4 space. And this didn't exactly crop up just yesterday.

Re: Questions re: VPN protocols globally

* Valdis Kletnieks: > On Wed, 05 Oct 2016 12:06:07 -0400, Eric Germann said: > >> Customers will connect to their respective regional sites separately. >> Any ITAR concerns there? > > If there are serious concerns there, I recommend spending the coin for > an actual ITAR expert. Right. I

Re: nested prefixes in Internet

* Martin T.: > Florian: > >> Are the autonomous systems for the /19 and /24 connected directly? > > Yes they are. Then deaggregation really isn't necessary at all. >> (1) can be better from B's perspective because it prevents certain >> routing table optimizations (due to the lack of the

Re: Questions re: VPN protocols globally

On Wed, 05 Oct 2016 12:06:07 -0400, Eric Germann said: > Customers will connect to their respective regional sites separately. > Any ITAR concerns there? If there are serious concerns there, I recommend spending the coin for an actual ITAR expert. pgpEfSfJNvtPM.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Level 3 voice outage

It’s good to see them acknowledging this. -mel On Oct 5, 2016, at 10:10 AM, Gareth Tupper > wrote: Looks like a fat finger event... From Level 3: "On October 4, our voice network experienced a service disruption

RE: Legislative proposal sent to my Congressman

The term you are referencing is unicast reverse path verify strict/hard mode Enforces that the packets source can be reached via the interface of the receiving traffic If this is generaly applied at all provider edge routers and dsl/dialup/vpc pop's would solve the spoofing issue as a whole

Re: Questions re: VPN protocols globally

IPSec and corporate. Customers will connect to their respective regional sites separately. Any ITAR concerns there? > On Oct 5, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Christopher Morrow > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Eric Germann

Re: Questions re: VPN protocols globally

I’m aware. We’re considering them down the line. So, back to the question, any ITAR gotchas with any of these companies? Thanks EKG > On Oct 5, 2016, at 11:05 AM, Peter Beckman wrote: > > There is a Mumbai, India three letter company region available as of June 27, >

RE: Level 3 voice outage

Looks like a fat finger event... >From Level 3: "On October 4, our voice network experienced a service disruption affecting some of our customers in North America due to a configuration error. We know how important these services are to our customers. As an organization, we're putting

Re: Legislative proposal sent to my Congressman

On 10/05/2016 09:46 AM, jim deleskie wrote: > Can we please not get the government ( who's gov ) involved. I fully agree > that it will not only not help, but will make some things worse. This is > why we can't have nice things. I would be in favor of your pleas if you would accompany it with

Re: Legislative proposal sent to my Congressman

Can we please not get the government ( who's gov ) involved. I fully agree that it will not only not help, but will make some things worse. This is why we can't have nice things. On Tuesday, October 4, 2016, Anne Mitchell wrote: > (Interesting and inarguably

Re: Questions re: VPN protocols globally

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Eric Germann wrote: > I’ve been charged with building a global VPN as an overlay on top of a > certain 3 letter company who also sells lots of stuff. > > you say 'vpn' do you mean 'mpls vpn' or 'ipsec vpn over intertubes' ? > We’re

Re: Questions re: VPN protocols globally

There is a Mumbai, India three letter company region available as of June 27, 2016 https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/now-open-aws-asia-pacific-mumbai-region/ On Tue, 4 Oct 2016, Eric Germann wrote: I’ve been charged with building a global VPN as an overlay on top of a certain 3 letter

Re: 10G tester recommendations?

On 5 October 2016 at 15:54, Bryan Holloway wrote: > Mainly RFC2544 and physical media. QoS could be handy, but it's not as > important as proving that the circuit is meeting our expectations from the > carrier(s). Then then EXFO is fine and much more affordable than Spirent or

Re: 10G tester recommendations?

Mainly RFC2544 and physical media. QoS could be handy, but it's not as important as proving that the circuit is meeting our expectations from the carrier(s). On 10/4/16 1:12 PM, Saku Ytti wrote: On 3 October 2016 at 22:09, Bryan Holloway wrote: We're in the market for a

Questions re: VPN protocols globally

I’ve been charged with building a global VPN as an overlay on top of a certain 3 letter company who also sells lots of stuff. We’re looking at US East US West US Central (eventually) Brazil Singapore Frankfurt Ireland Sydney Maybe Canada Maybe India (outsourcesrs) In the planning stages now

Re: nested prefixes in Internet

Florian: > Are the autonomous systems for the /19 and /24 connected directly? Yes they are. > (1) can be better from B's perspective because it prevents certain routing > table optimizations (due to the lack of the covering prefix) What kind of routing table optimizations are possible if