Re: pay.gov and IPv6

In message <87twb4slol@mid.deneb.enyo.de>, Florian Weimer writes: > * Mark Andrews: > > > The DNSSEC testing is also insufficient. 9-11commission.gov shows > > green for example but if you use DNS COOKIES (which BIND 9.10.4 and > > BIND 9.11.0 do) then servers barf and return BADVERS and

Re: China to HK providers you like?

PCCW might be a good choice given that Hong Kong is the gateway to China. From: NANOG on behalf of John A. Kilpatrick Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 7:54 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: China to HK providers you

Re: Re: Autunomous system filtering?

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 1:39 PM, wrote: > Consider that when we were announcing the whole /22 everything was working > correctly, then suddenly some ASs stopped to accept our prefixes. That's why > we decided to split the network and announce prefixes with different AS. >

Re: pay.gov and IPv6

I tested from my home and happy eyeballs is not falling back to IPv4. So, I tend to suspect that is not ICMPv6 filtering, but something else, such as wrong load balancer or ECMP configuration. Regards, Jordi -Mensaje original- De: NANOG en nombre de Carl

R: Re: Autunomous system filtering?

Thank you Massimiliano. Consider that when we were announcing the whole /22 everything was working correctly, then suddenly some ASs stopped to accept our prefixes. That's why we decided to split the network and announce prefixes with different AS. Moreover the /23 announced by AS2876 spreaded

China to HK providers you like?

It's been a while since I've had to look at mainland China connectivity - what is the current situation for point-to-point business circuits from China domestic locations to a datacenter in HK? Does anyone have providers they like? -- John A. Kilpatrick

Re: Autunomous system filtering?

Hi, On 18/11/16 19:04, Giuseppe Spanò - Datacast Srl wrote: > AS2876 announces 185.85.20.0/23 > AS207029 announces 185.85.22.0/23 (those prefixes are idle at the moment) > It seems an AS filtering is acting somewhere, and this looks a bit weird to > me. > Did this ever happen to any of you?

Re: pay.gov and IPv6

> > I am working with pay.gov.c...@clev.frb.org, trying to explain the > problem. The intersection of government bureaucracy and technical issues is frustrating to say the least. I just sent the message below, but have no expectation that it will change anything. == On Fri,

Re: pay.gov and IPv6

* Mark Andrews: > The DNSSEC testing is also insufficient. 9-11commission.gov shows > green for example but if you use DNS COOKIES (which BIND 9.10.4 and > BIND 9.11.0 do) then servers barf and return BADVERS and validation > fails. QWEST you have been informed of this already. > > Why the hell

Autunomous system filtering?

Hi! We are experiencing a strange issue with announcements from our AS207029. On Sept. 16th we began to announce our prefixes 185.85.20.0/22 through our upstream provider AS28716 (E-Planet). Everything worked correctly. Suddenly during the night between 17th and 18th Sept. the visibility of

Weekly Routing Table Report

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG, SdNOG, BJNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to

Re: Amsterdam/London Underesea Cables

> "Rod" == Rod Beck writes: Rod> Hi, Rod> I am trying to determine which undersea cables used for Rod> London/Amsterdam traffic are the most reliable - fewest outages due to Rod> shunt faults and other problems. I'm surprised repeaters are

Re: pay.gov and IPv6

On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Mark Andrews wrote: Why the hell should validating resolver have to work around the crap you guys are using? DO YOUR JOBS which is to use RFC COMPLIANT servers. You get PAID to do DNS because people think you are compentent to do the job. Evidence shows otherwise.

Re: pay.gov and IPv6

On 11/17/16, Carl Byington wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 15:32 -0500, Lee wrote: >> That's fine, but until someone is willing to work with them don't >> expect it to get fixed. > > I am working with

Re: Subject: Paging Olav van Doorn, Jan Willem Meijer, and Rutger Bevaart

Hi Ronald, You obviously managed to find us ;-) All our contact details are on peeringdb.com, our corporate website, LinkedIn, etc. We should be pretty easy to reach. The message you sent to our 24x7 NOC was marked as “spam”, ironic. Thank you for bringing this to my attention, we’ve asked

Amsterdam/London Underesea Cables

Hi, I am trying to determine which undersea cables used for London/Amsterdam traffic are the most reliable - fewest outages due to shunt faults and other problems. Looks like most of the traffic traverses the following systems: Farland North UK-Netherlands Ulysses Circe North Concerto