Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

2016-12-05 Thread Roland Dobbins
On 5 Dec 2016, at 21:50, Graham Johnston wrote: What is your preferred one and why? Thorough, reasonable teat methodology, allows one to store history, decent range of test servers worldwide. --- Roland Dobbins

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

2016-12-05 Thread Eric Dugas
I like nperf.com as I usually always get consistent results and you can keep track of your results if you sign up. They only have one server in Canada (hosted by OVH in Beauharnois) but you can host your own like Ookla's Speedtest.net. On 5 December 2016 at 15:37, Janusz Jezowicz

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

2016-12-05 Thread Nick Ryce
For testing downloads, fast.com is pretty nice Nick Ryce Fluency Communications (Commsworld Ltd T/A) T: +44 (0) 330 121 1000 www.fluency.net.uk n...@fluency.net.uk On 05/12/2016, 14:50, "NANOG on behalf of Graham Johnston"

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

2016-12-05 Thread Janusz Jezowicz
My company Speedchecker offers good alternative, we have HTML5 technology as well as native SDKs for mobile such as iOS,Android and Windows I can send more information about our measurement methodology, customer base etc if required. We did comparison of Fast.com and our technology few months

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

2016-12-05 Thread Theodore Baschak
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > On 05/12/2016 16:50, Graham Johnston wrote: > > http://openspeedtest.com/ > > http://labs.comcast.com/beta-testing-a-new-open-source-speed-test > > -Hank > > I'm impressed that openspeedtest.com supports IPv6! I

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

2016-12-05 Thread Mike
On 12/5/2016 12:31 PM, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > On 05/12/2016 16:50, Graham Johnston wrote: > > http://openspeedtest.com/ > Pegs my connection at 40.30 mbps upload. I have Comcast 25/5. My upload is usually in the 6 or 7 mbps range.

Need contact info for AS1798 - State of Oregon

2016-12-05 Thread Tyler Applebaum
If you could contact me off-list, I'd appreciate it. - Tyler

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

2016-12-05 Thread Mike Hammett
A lot of people can't differentiate between what the test is testing, a bad test and connectivity issues producing bad results on an otherwise good test. I'd say that most of the time, it's the last category. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

2016-12-05 Thread Mike Hammett
Right, it's mostly ISPs that don't understand the BGP world or how speedtests work. I think, you, Paul and myself were the only ones participating that really knew. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

2016-12-05 Thread Hank Nussbacher
On 05/12/2016 16:50, Graham Johnston wrote: http://openspeedtest.com/ http://labs.comcast.com/beta-testing-a-new-open-source-speed-test -Hank > For many years we have had a local instance of the Ookla speedtest.net on our > network, and while it is pretty good some other tests seem include

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

2016-12-05 Thread Josh Reynolds
There was an afmug thread about this exact issue several months ago. On Dec 5, 2016 9:57 AM, "Mike Hammett" wrote: > Ah, this is the first I've heard of slow fast.com performance with > someone actually connected to them. Usually it's an ISP that's a few AS > hops away from

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

2016-12-05 Thread Josh Reynolds
I was thinking they tested up too, but still.. Never had good performance testing to them upon release. Good connectivity with several diverse upstreams. Always had better results with beta.speedtest. YMMV On Dec 5, 2016 9:59 AM, "Steven Miano" wrote: > First, you only get

Re: Acquiring unused IP range. Some questions

2016-12-05 Thread Tony Tauber
It would be helpful also if the whois record is updated with the Origin AS listed. See ARIN's post on the topic: https://www.arin.net/resources/originas.html Tony On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 10:08 PM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote: > > My question is, what do they and we need to do

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

2016-12-05 Thread Steven Miano
First, you only get down from fast.com not up - so the up/down is a bit suspect there. Second, this is a more 'real world' test than iperf - if you want to ensure that your NIC is operating at the rated speed I'd imagine you'd have the ability to setup an iperf target and check Layer2/Layer3

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

2016-12-05 Thread Mike Hammett
Ah, this is the first I've heard of slow fast.com performance with someone actually connected to them. Usually it's an ISP that's a few AS hops away from Netflix. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

2016-12-05 Thread Josh Reynolds
A lot of people have crappy performance to those. For example, from a 10G server to fast.com I was pulling around 9Mbps up/down. 1 hop away from a Netflix open connect appliance. On Dec 5, 2016 9:49 AM, "Steven Miano" wrote: > fast.com is a dead fast/simple download result

Re: Favorite Speed Test Systems

2016-12-05 Thread Steven Miano
fast.com is a dead fast/simple download result page. ...also with a huge customer base - it is often closer to speedtest..net|com than some of those others. There is also a speedtest-cli available on Linux/MacOS (via Brew). On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Graham Johnston

Favorite Speed Test Systems

2016-12-05 Thread Graham Johnston
For many years we have had a local instance of the Ookla speedtest.net on our network, and while it is pretty good some other tests seem include more detailed results. I am aware of the following speedtest systems that an operator can likely have a local instance of: * Speedtest.net