Re: [Tier1 ISP]: Vulnerable to a new DDoS amplification attack

I am just trying to grasp what is similarity between networks on the list and why it doesn't include, say NTT or Cogent. On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG < nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > Hello all, I'm a first time poster here and hope to follow all rules. > > I found

Re: [Tier1 ISP]: Vulnerable to a new DDoS amplification attack

care to do a demo ? On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG < nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > Hello all, I'm a first time poster here and hope to follow all rules. > > I found a new way to amplify traffic that would generate really high > volume of traffic.+10Tbps > > ** There is

Any WAVE Business clue on the list?

If so, can you hit me up offlist? Thank You, Mike -- Mike Lyon 408-621-4826 mike.l...@gmail.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/mlyon

Re: Wanted: volunteers with bandwidth/storage to help save climate data

On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:54:42 -0500, Andrew Kirch said: > I can't for the life of me see why we'd have to deal with it in the course > of our jobs beyond calling someone and having them install more A/C. This > is, flat-out, off topic. You don't have any fiber that runs into regen shacks in

Re: Wanted: volunteers with bandwidth/storage to help save climate data

On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:49:41 -0500, Ken Chase said: > "If it's a politically-generated thing I'll have to deal with at an > operational level, it's on topic." Hmm.. works for me. pgp0FlidUAEkD.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Wanted: volunteers with bandwidth/storage to help save climate data

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote: > Simply put… if the data that is hosted on the sites aforementioned then cough > up the damn space and host it. Data space is cheap as hell these days, parse > it and get the hell on with it already. > >

Re: Wanted: volunteers with bandwidth/storage to help save climate data

Simply put… if the data that is hosted on the sites aforementioned then cough up the damn space and host it. Data space is cheap as hell these days, parse it and get the hell on with it already. *Disclaimer* not meant to single out any one party in this conversation but the whole subject all

Re: Wanted: volunteers with bandwidth/storage to help save climate data

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Royce Williams wrote: [snip] > IMO, *operational, politics-free* discussion of items like these would > also be on topic for NANOG: > > - Some *operational* workarounds for country-wide blocking of > Facebook, Whatsapp, and Twitter [1],

Re: [Tier1 ISP]: Vulnerable to a new DDoS amplification attack

NTP Monlist was what, 200x? 100x amplification attacks are s 2013. :) I doubt many will fall for your Rolodex expanding exercise though, sorry. ( Do people still have Rolodexes? ) On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG < nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > Hello all, I'm a

Re: replacing EPP?

In article you write: >Has there been an discussion about replacing EPP with something more modern? No. That was easy. The spec has been updated a few times, most recently by RFC 5730 and 5734 in 2009 but it

replacing EPP?

Has there been an discussion about replacing EPP with something more modern? Cheers Ryan

Re: Wanted: volunteers with bandwidth/storage to help save climate data

I can't for the life of me see why we'd have to deal with it in the course of our jobs beyond calling someone and having them install more A/C. This is, flat-out, off topic. Andrew On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Royce Williams wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 3:49

Re: Wanted: volunteers with bandwidth/storage to help save climate data

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Ken Chase wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 04:41:29PM -0800, Doug Barton said: > [..] > >>Everyone has a line at which "I don't care what's in the pipes, I just > >>work here" changes into something more actionable. > > > >Stretched far

Re: Wanted: volunteers with bandwidth/storage to help save climate data

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 04:41:29PM -0800, Doug Barton said: [..] >>Everyone has a line at which "I don't care what's in the pipes, I just >>work here" changes into something more actionable. > >Stretched far beyond any credibility. Your argument boils down to, "If it's >a political

Re: Wanted: volunteers with bandwidth/storage to help save climate data

On 12/20/2016 8:08 AM, Royce Williams wrote: n Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Doug Barton wrote: On 12/16/2016 1:48 PM, Hugo Slabbert wrote: This started as a technical appeal, but: https://www.nanog.org/list 1. Discussion will focus on Internet operational and

[Tier1 ISP]: Vulnerable to a new DDoS amplification attack

Hello all, I'm a first time poster here and hope to follow all rules. I found a new way to amplify traffic that would generate really high volume of traffic.+10Tbps ** There is no need for spoofing ** so any device in the world could initiate a really big attack or be part of an attack. We

Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase (update)

Hello. I'm Sho FUJIMURA. I operate the public NTP Services as 133.100.9.2 and 133.100.11.8. I'd like to reduce the traffic because I have trouble with too much traffic recently. So, I'm interested in the root of the the problem. If possible, would you please tell me the model numbers of Tenda and

Re: Recent NTP pool traffic increase (update)

Hello, I'm not sure i should continue to CC nanog, if someone interested to be in CC for further updates this story please let me know. TP-Link not related, it was misunderstanding or wrong customer report. Tenda routers i believe most of cheap models are affected by this problem. On ISPs i