Re: External BGP Controller for L3 Switch BGP routing

On 1/15/17 11:00 PM, Yucong Sun wrote: > In my setup, I use an BIRD instance to combine multiple internet full > tables, i use some filter to generate some override route to send to my L3 > switch to do routing. The L3 switch is configured with the default route > to the main transit provider ,

Re: Apple Caching Server question

> On 17/01/2017, at 12:47 pm, Theodore Baschak wrote: > > I haven't ever tried to do multiple public IPs (I only enable caching server > once inside my home network as a test), but it looks like from the settings > window that it is possible to have more than one public

Re: External BGP Controller for L3 Switch BGP routing

On 1/16/17 6:53 AM, Tore Anderson wrote: > * Saku Ytti > >> On 16 January 2017 at 14:36, Tore Anderson wrote: >> >>> Put it another way, my «Internet facing» interfaces are typically >>> 10GEs with a few (kilo)metres of dark fibre that x-connects into my >>> IP-transit providers'

Re: St. Louis IX Launch

Congrats to St Louis! I put in about 40 racks for Clearwire a few years back and enjoyed the city, even if it was winter. -- Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, +1 (360) 474-7474 On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > It is a partnership and I may not be the

Re: Apple Caching Server question

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204675 Content types supported by the Caching service Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net --- http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth http://www.midwest-ix.com COO/Chairman Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric

Re: Apple Caching Server question

> On Jan 16, 2017, at 5:20 PM, Pete Mundy wrote: > > > Those dual Mac Mini 1U rack-mount cases are great! Two of the quad-core > 'server' versions of the Minis gave quite a bit of punch for only 1RU @ 300mm > deep. > > I have a couple of these types of builds deployed

Re: Apple Caching Server question

> On 14/01/2017, at 6:25 am, Blake Hudson wrote: > > lane.pow...@swat.coop wrote on 1/13/2017 7:43 AM: >> I saw the apple caching server mentioned on an earlier thread. Is this >> appropriate/functional/scaleable enough to implement as an ISP? It is an >> intriguing idea. From

Re: IPv6 BGP prefix filters

On 1/16/17 2:01 PM, Alistair Mackenzie wrote: > Hi, > > So recently I've come across an issue with a large ISP announcing a /22 and > /25 of IPv6 space. We are currently filtering <28 and >48 which until now > has worked fine for us. > > What are others using as their prefix filters in the DFZ?

Re: IPv6 BGP prefix filters

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:01:00PM +, Alistair Mackenzie wrote: > So recently I've come across an issue with a large ISP announcing a > /22 and /25 of IPv6 space. We are currently filtering <28 and >48 > which until now has worked fine for us. > > What are others using as their prefix filters

IPv6 BGP prefix filters

Hi, So recently I've come across an issue with a large ISP announcing a /22 and /25 of IPv6 space. We are currently filtering <28 and >48 which until now has worked fine for us. What are others using as their prefix filters in the DFZ? Thanks, Alistair

Fwd: APRICOT 2017 programme reminder

Hello all. FYI. Mark. Forwarded Message Subject:[apnic-talk] APRICOT 2017 programme reminder Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 16:51:22 -1000 From: Philip Smith To: apnic-t...@apnic.net Hi everyone, Just a reminder that

[NANOG-announce] NANOG 69 Hotel Room Block

NANOGers - The NANOG 69 Hotel Room block has been extended through COB today. There are still a few rooms available - make sure to book now if you need a hotel for the meeting next month. Use this link to reserve your room: https://aws.passkey.com/event/14495515/owner/544/home Cheers,

Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment

Why do not you feel compelled to ask this question? Did you ask this question when you deployed ipv4? AFAIK, everyone deploys ipv4 in a unique way. Same for ipv6. IPv6 is not exotic or filled with unique pitfalls. A lot of networks have deployed production networks with ipv6, each one unique,

Re: Questions on IPv6 deployment

I have a /32 assigned from ARIN (2001:4918::/32) I’m looking for some direction/reading list of how to properly configure IPv6. I’ve read to use a /64 for PtP interfaces and I’ve read use a /128 instead.Assign all loopbacks from the same /64, use a different /64 for each loopback. Ect,

Questions on IPv6 deployment

Hello, I’m AS7849 and I have an IP problem. I’m running IPv4 ( /16 legacy + /20) and have enough space to last me for a while, multi-homed, BGP4 full tables + peering, ect. I have some new shiny Juniper MX480s (RE-S-2X00x6, 64MB RAM) in my core. I want to start building my IPv6

Re: External BGP Controller for L3 Switch BGP routing

On 16 January 2017 at 16:53, Tore Anderson wrote: Hey, > (Server) --10GE--> (T2 leaf X) --40GE--> (T2 spine) --40GE--> > (T2 leaf Y) --10GE--> (IP-transit/"the Internet") --10GE--> (Client) > > If I understand you correctly you're saying this is a "suspect" topology > that cannot

Re: External BGP Controller for L3 Switch BGP routing

* Saku Ytti > On 16 January 2017 at 14:36, Tore Anderson wrote: > > > Put it another way, my «Internet facing» interfaces are typically > > 10GEs with a few (kilo)metres of dark fibre that x-connects into my > > IP-transit providers' routers sitting in nearby rooms or racks > >

Re: External BGP Controller for L3 Switch BGP routing

❦ 16 janvier 2017 14:08 +0200, Saku Ytti  : > I wonder if true whitelabel is possible, would some 'real' HW vendor, > of BRCM size, release HW docs openly? Then some integrator could start > selling the HW with BOM+10-20%, no support, no software at all. And > community could build

Re: External BGP Controller for L3 Switch BGP routing

On 16 January 2017 at 14:36, Tore Anderson wrote: > But here you're talking about the RTT of each individual link, right, > not the RTT of the entire path through the Internet for any given flow? I'm talking about RTT of end-to-end, which will determine window-size, which will

Re: External BGP Controller for L3 Switch BGP routing

I thought your post was fairly self-explanatory, but people seem to be all over the place... except for what you actually asked about. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Faisal Imtiaz"

Re: External BGP Controller for L3 Switch BGP routing

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 01:36:54PM +0100, Tore Anderson wrote: > > But here you're talking about the RTT of each individual link, right, > not the RTT of the entire path through the Internet for any given flow? > > Put it another way, my ??Internet facing?? interfaces are typically 10GEs with >

Re: External BGP Controller for L3 Switch BGP routing

Arista has a version of their switches that can handle a full table. I think what the OP is asking about though is something like openflow though. Some have played around with using it to modify the switches routing table based on flows that exist. The same theory applies in regard to the

Re: External BGP Controller for L3 Switch BGP routing

* Saku Ytti > Why I said it won't be a problem inside DC, is because low RTT, which > means small bursts. I'm talking about backend network infra in DC, not > Internet facing. Anywhere where you'll see large RTT and > speed/availability step-down you'll need buffers (unless we

Re: External BGP Controller for L3 Switch BGP routing

On 16 January 2017 at 08:40, Tore Anderson wrote: Hey, > Do you know of any traditional «Internet scale» router that can do ~720 > Gbps of throughput for less than 10x the price of a Trident II box? Or > even <100kUSD? (Disregarding any volume discounts.) It's really hard to talk

Re: External BGP Controller for L3 Switch BGP routing

I'm going to be keeping a close eye on this: http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/a-bigger-helping-of-internet-please On Jan 16, 2017 1:03 AM, "Yucong Sun" wrote: > In my setup, I use an BIRD instance to combine multiple internet full > tables, i use some filter to generate some