Re: Multi-CDN Strategies

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Chris Woodfield wrote: > I could keep going, but if so, I might as well stick them into a > powerpoint and submit a talk for Bellevue :) Not a bad idea! Maybe there's a BCOP here..? -- @ChrisGrundemann http://chrisgrundemann.com

Re: Conference Videos

Has there been some assessment of how justified have those seeking the "right to be forgotten" been in becoming forgotten? By doing so does it risk changing the record in a way that is not beneficial to the community and historical record? I warmly second the plaudit and thanks to Brandon for his

Re: Regulatory Recovery Surcharge for Canadian corporations

For sure Sent from my iPad > On Mar 14, 2017, at 11:54 AM, Todd Grand wrote: > > I still believe the onus is on them to justify the extension of these costs, > regardless of what was in the agreement. > > Todd Grand > > -Original Message- > From: Luke Guillory

RE: Regulatory Recovery Surcharge for Canadian corporations

I still believe the onus is on them to justify the extension of these costs, regardless of what was in the agreement. Todd Grand -Original Message- From: Luke Guillory [mailto:lguill...@reservetele.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 11:39 AM To: Todd Grand Cc: NANOG

Re: Regulatory Recovery Surcharge for Canadian corporations

I just went back over my email string with one of our transit providers since I recalled submitting an exempt form for something. They added the Federal Universal Service Fund Surcharge to our transit link, odd since this isn't a voice related circuit. This also wasn't on the quote or

RE: Regulatory Recovery Surcharge for Canadian corporations

In reply to the group as my reply was only to Luke. This is why I say, they should need to justify the extension of these costs. In my opinion a transit provider should not have any justification to extend said costs. One might suggest that the unjustified extension of these costs could be

Re: Regulatory Recovery Surcharge for Canadian corporations

We've never seen anything like this on our Canadian transit bills (Cogent, NAC, GTT, Hurricane.) /kc -- Ken Chase - m...@sizone.org Guelph Canada

Re: Regulatory Recovery Surcharge for Canadian corporations

On transit though? We in the US pay all of these types of fees as well though not on service outside of telephone. Sent from my iPad > Luke Guillory Network Operations Manager Tel:985.536.1212 Fax:985.536.0300 Email: lguill...@reservetele.com Reserve Telecommunications 100 RTC Dr

RE: Regulatory Recovery Surcharge for Canadian corporations

These costs are related to federal, provincial and/or municipal mandates, programs and requirements such as provincial 9-1-1 fees, spectrum acquisition, licensing charges, and contribution charges to help subsidize telephone service in rural and remote areas. These costs are not taxes or amounts

Re: Regulatory Recovery Surcharge for Canadian corporations

>From what I've gathered so far, every other carriers that we use are either invoicing us from Canada or outside the US (e.g. Telia from Vancouver, BC and Cogent from Toronto, ON). A couple of minutes after firing my first email, our rep called me to follow up. He'll escalate this as far as

RE: Regulatory Recovery Surcharge for Canadian corporations

We don't explicitly pay a charge like this for the transit bandwidth we purchase in Toronto from an international carrier, and I doubt that it is built into the cost without any mention of it. I've never heard of such a thing. Graham Johnston Network Planner Westman Communications Group

Regulatory Recovery Surcharge for Canadian corporations

I recently negotiated a new contract with a tier1 for IP transit in Canada and just got the invoice. I saw a "new" Regulatory Recovery Surcharge of 10% the MRC (before taxes) that I've never seen before. Do any of my Canadian fellows on this list are paying this outrageous surcharge? Other

Re: Conference Videos

Speakers are informed they are going to be recorded. If they have sensitive information, they can choose a track and ask it not be recorded. NANOG has done this in the past, but you should talk to the Program Committee if you are interested in this. We've had this within UKNOF ... sometimes

Re: Conference Videos

We record and put on youtube the uknof.org.uk meetings and it still gets bigger every time (around 3x growth since we started streaming). - and we at UKNOF are grateful for Brandon for doing this... :) In terms of UKNOF, we get complaints when we DON'T webcast content or make video's