Re: Interconnection Track

Hi Mehmet, *Great effort here. +1.* I'd suggest that you bring new faces to the game. New ideas are needed. Topic wise: - 'inside' settlement free peering - Content vs. Network Operators, and right sizing where the traffic comes from - Once and for all: Are IXP's as dead as some say? Hope

Re: AS9498 Bharti BGP hijacks

Hi, What's more concerning here is that those prefixes were able to pass through all filters on their way, via their transits and maybe probably via their peers as well. Haven't we been here before !?! And here I thought 2017 internet would be a "safer" place. Silly me... Y. > Le 1 avr.

Re: AS9498 Bharti BGP hijacks

Hi all, Perhaps another explanation is that these are router2router linknets between the involved parties, and all we are seeing is the effect of "redistribute connected". If this is the case, the word "hijack" might be somewhat strong worded. Kind regards, Job On Sat, 1 Apr 2017 at 23:25,

Re: AS9498 Bharti BGP hijacks

So not only are they hijacking prefixes, they're leaking the /30s to their peers. Failure through and through. On Saturday, April 1, 2017, George William Herbert wrote: > > Hey, Bharti, knock that off. > > http://bgpstream.com/event/78126 >

Interconnection Track

Hello, As promised few months ago publically I have volunteered to bring together content to have Peering Track back to agenda. Now called "Interconnection Track" I would like to ask those who will attend, have attended in person in the past or those who have organized similar events to chime in

AS9498 Bharti BGP hijacks

Hey, Bharti, knock that off. http://bgpstream.com/event/78126 http://bgpstream.com/event/78125 http://bgpstream.com/event/78124 http://bgpstream.com/event/78123 http://bgpstream.com/event/78122 Sent from my iPhone