RE: noction vs border6 vs kentik vs fcp vs ?

2017-07-12 Thread Romeo Czumbil
Kentik has been great for us on notification and analysis. They are pretty much accurate and you can set-up tons of alerts and even action. For example Automatic blackhole for DDoS I wouldn’t use them to shift your traffic around (aka traffic engineering) but I'm sure you can set that up as well.

Re: BGP peering question

2017-07-12 Thread cyrus ramirez via NANOG
Is your AS registered with ARIN?2 byte or 4 byte ASN number?How many devices are you peering with?Dual homed, multi homed?Bandwidth?Type of traffic? There are alot more... Regards,Cyrus Ramirez   On Wednesday, July 12, 2017, 3:11:38 PM EDT, David Hofstee wrote:

Re: noction vs border6 vs kentik vs fcp vs ?

2017-07-12 Thread valdis . kletnieks
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:03:50 -0700, ShaColby Jackson said: > I know solutions like Kentik do a lot more but I’m focusing on just the > above use case. Also ignoring the cloud vs. on-prem difference, assume that > doesn’t matter. Might want to re-think that. In a world where some eyeball

noction vs border6 vs kentik vs fcp vs ?

2017-07-12 Thread ShaColby Jackson
I know this topic has gone around a couple times but wondering if there are any new strong opinions on inbound+outbound traffic analysis with a bonus for excellence in traffic engineering at the edge. A typical use case would be finding an AS or prefix representing a large volume of inbound and/or

Re: BGP peering question

2017-07-12 Thread David Hofstee
I would state that peering gives more control over the traffic you handle (since it is not going over someone else's network). Every hop is a possible problem to your operations, I guess. David On 12 July 2017 at 09:13, Wolfgang Tremmel wrote: > > > On 11. Jul

Re: BGP peering question

2017-07-12 Thread Tore Anderson
* craig washington > Newbie question, what criteria do you look for when you decide that > you want to peer with someone or if you will accept peering with > someone from an ISP point of view. Routing hygiene. I expect the would-be peer to keep the number of advertised routes that are either 1)

Re: BGP peering question

2017-07-12 Thread Wolfgang Tremmel
> On 11. Jul 2017, at 21:43, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: >> 1) Are they present an IX where I am present? >> >> 2) Can they configure BGP correctly? >> >> 3) … Beer? > > > 1) do they have a pulse? 4 ) are they in PeeringDB and keep their entry up to