Re: Verizon 701 Route leak?

2017-08-29 Thread Randy Bush
> Good use-case for > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-adj-rib-out and > snapshot auditing before and after changes. Leak didn't last long but > it could have been caught within milliseconds verses minutes via oh > sh** alarms. [ i happen to like bmp, but ... ] if the sender

Re: Verizon 701 Route leak?

2017-08-29 Thread Randy Bush
>> Damn you Google.. yup. Thanks for links. > A public post-mortem would be highly appreciated (from all parties). there has been more press hysteria on this than actual packet droppage. goog fat fingered or otherwise misannounced a numer of large consumer isp's prefixes. the leak was for aybe

Re: Hurricane Harvey - Network Status (FCC)

2017-08-29 Thread Timothy Sesow
Tegna, ownership group of KHOU, had a news report that the news studio for KHOU was setup at a "PBS station in Dallas", with satellite uplink to KUSA (Denver). Master Control is running at KUSA Denver for KHOU service area, with satellite back to the transmitter for KHOU. According to the FCC

Max Prefix Out, was Re: Verizon 701 Route leak?

2017-08-29 Thread Michael Still
I agree a max-prefix outbound could potentially be useful and would hopefully not be too terribly difficult to implement for most vendors. Perhaps RFC4486 would need to be updated to reflect this as a possibility as well? On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Julien Goodwin

Re: Cogent BCP-38

2017-08-29 Thread Rob Evans
> Well, if you are using public IP addresses for infra you are violating your > RIR’s policy more than likely. [Citation needed.] :) Rob

RE: Verizon 701 Route leak?

2017-08-29 Thread Mikael Abrahamsson
On Mon, 28 Aug 2017, Marcus Josephson wrote: Damn you Google.. yup. Thanks for links. A public post-mortem would be highly appreciated (from all parties). -- Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se

Re: Cogent BCP-38

2017-08-29 Thread Job Snijders
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 08:41:12AM -0400, Robert Blayzor wrote: > > On 29 August 2017 at 03:38, Robert Blayzor wrote: > > > >> Well not completely useless. BCP will still drop BOGONs at the edge > >> before they leak into your network. > > > > Assuming you don't use them

Re: Cogent BCP-38

2017-08-29 Thread Robert Blayzor
> On 29 August 2017 at 03:38, Robert Blayzor wrote: > >> Well not completely useless. BCP will still drop BOGONs at the edge before >> they leak into your network. > > Assuming you don't use them in your own infra. And cost of RPF is lot > higher than cost of ACL. Them

Re: Cogent BCP-38

2017-08-29 Thread Saku Ytti
On 29 August 2017 at 03:38, Robert Blayzor wrote: > Well not completely useless. BCP will still drop BOGONs at the edge before > they leak into your network. Assuming you don't use them in your own infra. And cost of RPF is lot higher than cost of ACL. Them being