UPnP is the spawn of Beelzebub.
Implementation by Bugs Bunny's maroons for use by other maroons is ok, I
suppose, as long as those of us who are not maroons can turn the evil off.
However, if those maroons start whining about all the crap that happened to
them because they enabled UPnP they be
I have some good success with kcptun - https://github.com/xtaci/kcptun it's
designed to handle problematic links.
On 11 December 2017 at 17:34, Alain Hebert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're used to fix Long Fat Network issues ourself...
>
> But I'm stuck in a case where we need to transparently pr
Hi,
We're used to fix Long Fat Network issues ourself...
But I'm stuck in a case where we need to transparently proxy TCP
connections to apply congestion algorithms (cubic, htcp, etc) since some
of our newer customers are ... well ... refusing to acknowledge that
reality.
Any go
https://nmap.org/nsedoc/scripts/quake3-master-getservers.html
I'd nuke the entire environment from orbit, no telling what other nasty
surprises they left for you
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Richard
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2017 1:36 PM
T
On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:23:11 -0300, Fernando Gont said:
> Anyone can comment on the UPnP support for IPv6 in home routers?
>
> Those that I have checked have UPnP support for IPv4, but not for IPv6
> -- even when the home router does otherwise support IPv6.
Well, there's a bit of a problem there.
Folks,
Anyone can comment on the UPnP support for IPv6 in home routers?
Those that I have checked have UPnP support for IPv4, but not for IPv6
-- even when the home router does otherwise support IPv6.
Looking at UPnP itself, it seems to allow opening holes at the IGD, but
on a fully-specified (l
6 matches
Mail list logo
