> Hi,
> It seem that Manageengine Netflowanalyzer support Netflow-lite with a
> Cisco 4948E
> http://help.netflowanalyzer.com/supported-devices
>
> Did someone get this working? I did a lot of tests but not able to get
> data. Flows are correctly exported to the analyzer but no data are
> displa
One can analyze the calling frequency, but even that's problematic as it
can penalize a successful customer that isn't scamming. Besides as HAL
wrote many of these calls are not originating in NA. If digital
residential lines hadn't died they might make the original source
visible making it e
Sounds like the Juniper is leaking a "default" BPDU as it resets the
various internal chip configurations, which the Cisco receives thus
triggering the err-disable.
/mark
Please see the link below, that ugly hack should be disabled asap on all your
Cisco boxes:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/t5/lan-switching-and-routing/spanning-tree-etherchannel-guard-misconfig/td-p/1147273
MD
On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 11:31:17 -0700, Keenan Tims wrote
> What it's telling you is tota
What it's telling you is totally unclear, though. I've asked TAC to
explain to me the packet behaviour that generates this errdisable, and
haven't been able to get a clear answer from them. It seems to come out
of 'nowhere' on multi-vendor networks, where all other vendors are
perfectly happy and n
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG, IRNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-s
*cough*
http://brightcloud.com/tools/url-ip-lookup.php
You can request removals there.
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 9:28 AM, Kaiser, Erich wrote:
> We are seeing false positives on NAt'd IPs on our customers networks,
> please correct this issue. This started a few days ago...
>
>
> Erich Kaiser
> Th
On Fri 2018-Apr-06 11:25:12 -0500, Kaiser, Erich wrote:
AS-stats works well for this and its free...
+1
Or see the other recent netflow tools thread[1] for inspiration.
--
Hugo Slabbert | email, xmpp/jabber: h...@slabnet.com
pgp key: B178313E | also on Signal
[1] https://mailman.n
We are seeing false positives on NAt'd IPs on our customers networks,
please correct this issue. This started a few days ago...
Erich Kaiser
The Fusion Network
er...@gotfusion.net
Office: 815-570-3101
AS-stats works well for this and its free...
Erich Kaiser
The Fusion Network
er...@gotfusion.net
Office: 815-570-3101
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:18 AM, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
> On Fri 2018-Apr-06 09:46:42 -0500, Aaron Gould wrote:
>
> Thanks Doug, Kentik sounds familiar, I think I've spoken wi
On Fri 2018-Apr-06 09:46:42 -0500, Aaron Gould wrote:
Thanks Doug, Kentik sounds familiar, I think I've spoken with them at a
conference once or twice... a quick like at their website reminds me that
they focus on ddos and understanding traffic better... not sure how this
applies to the thread
Hi All,
I thought there might be interest in availability of sFlow in Junos OS
Release 18.1R1 for MX routers:
https://blog.sflow.com/2018/04/sflow-available-on-juniper-mx-series.html
Peter
Thanks Anurag, is there anyone on the list from Amazon AWS Cloudfront that can
speak to this ?
“And AWS Cloudfront does has the option of edge locations not connected to
their backbone.“
I’m an ISP and have fb fna, nf oca, ggc, and Akamai aanp, … does Amazon AWS
Cloudfront ship servers t
Thanks Doug, Kentik sounds familiar, I think I've spoken with them at a
conference once or twice... a quick like at their website reminds me that
they focus on ddos and understanding traffic better... not sure how this
applies to the thread originated by Russell.
-Aaron
I received this in my email today...seemed timely regarding this
thread..please forgive if not appropriate use of list..does this
add anything to the conversation? stll learning herei like the
picture.thank you...
doug kenline
reston, virginia
Dear Doug,
We ar
15 matches
Mail list logo