On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:54:05AM -0400, John R. Levine wrote:
> >You *can* get a fax across a G.711 connection if your throughput,
>
> My SIP provider supports T.38. How much difference does that make?
It can make a great deal of difference.
You change the dynamics from:
FWIW a German court has just ruled against ICANN's injunction and in
favor of Tucows/EPAG.
https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-4-2018-05-30-en
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die| b...@theworld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com
Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1
You *can* get a fax across a G.711 connection if your throughput,
My SIP provider supports T.38. How much difference does that make?
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 11:14:12PM -0400, John Levine wrote:
[...FAX over IP...]
> I don't really care if it's flaky. For one fax a month a few retries
> are not a big deal. But hellofax's free 5 pages a month will probably
> do the job.
For folks that have made it this far, you might be
In article you write:
>http://www.circleid.com/posts/20180527_icann_files_legal_action_against_domain_registrar_whois_data/
Elliot said that if he had to choose between fighting ICANN and
fighting governments, he'd fight ICANN. I can't blame him.
In article you write:
>Have you considered paying the $0.50 per page to have the local copy
>shop send the once-a-month faxes?
Since the local copy shop is about a half hour drive from here, no.
I don't really care if it's flaky. For one fax a month a few retries
are not a big deal. But
http://www.circleid.com/posts/20180527_icann_files_legal_action_against_domain_registrar_whois_data/
-Dan
> On May 30, 2018, at 4:10 PM, Andrew Latham wrote:
>
> T.38 if your provider supports it
>
> Try https://github.com/hehol/t38modem
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:15 PM John R. Levine wrote:
>
>> Can anyone recommend software that sends faxes over SIP? I have plenty of
>> inbound fax to
On 05/30/2018 01:13 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
> Can anyone recommend software that sends faxes over SIP?
No. Just NO. The problem is that all the modulation methods that FAX
transmission use requires time stability in the analog channel, and
there is no way that SIP is going to be that stable.
T.38 if your provider supports it
Try https://github.com/hehol/t38modem
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 3:15 PM John R. Levine wrote:
> Can anyone recommend software that sends faxes over SIP? I have plenty of
> inbound fax to email services, but now and then I need to send a reply and
> it looks
> On May 30, 2018, at 4:13 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
>
> Can anyone recommend software that sends faxes over SIP? I have plenty of
> inbound fax to email services, but now and then I need to send a reply and it
> looks tacky to use one of the free web ones that put an ad on it.
>
> I know
On 30/May/18 22:49, Ben Cannon wrote:
> The reason you see one or two bars in inner cities in 2018, is that
> given fixed spectrum, bandwidth on the aggregate can only increase if
> you take many smaller lower power radios, and carpet the area with
> them.
>
> The only other solutions are
*nods* The whole concept of SSL all of the things is severely misplaced... and
the thread I caught exemplifies why.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Medcalf"
To: nanog@nanog.org
The reason you see one or two bars in inner cities in 2018, is that given fixed
spectrum, bandwidth on the aggregate can only increase if you take many smaller
lower power radios, and carpet the area with them.
The only other solutions are radically increase the power, or radically
increase
On 30/May/18 19:47, McBride, Mack wrote:
> Scott hit the nail on the head.
>
> Hotel/café/mall wifi is generally horrible for the same reason urban
> 4g is horrible.
>
Urban 4G in Africa isn't that bad, actually. The factors are many - not
all users are on smart phones, or if they are, may
There are some interesting developments with sector (down to 30* or narrower)
and multi-band, multi-radio, 4x4MIMO wifi gear lately. Ubiquiti is making
amazing strides in this space. Watch 40k wifi connections in a stadium become
the norm soon.
I disagree entirely, and counter that the
On 30/May/18 19:10, K. Scott Helms wrote:
> Mark,
>
> A couple of things, first that kind of utilization isn't feasible once
> penetration rates in dense areas reach certain levels. There's a
> reason that NTT Docomo moved more than 70% of their data traffic to
> the 3.5 GHz band and that
Can anyone recommend software that sends faxes over SIP? I have plenty of
inbound fax to email services, but now and then I need to send a reply and
it looks tacky to use one of the free web ones that put an ad on it.
I know that if I wanted to pay $15/mo there are lots of lovely services
“I'm running two Juniper MX104s. Each MX has 1 ISP connected running
BGP(full routes). iBGP is running between the routers via a two port 20G
lag. When one of the ISPs fails, it can take upwards of 2 minutes for
traffic to start flowing correctly. The router has the correct route in the
routing
Scott hit the nail on the head.
Hotel/café/mall wifi is generally horrible for the same reason urban 4g is
horrible.
The backhaul and load on the available spectrum is usually excessive.
Carrier wifi is usually (but not always) equipped with decent backhaul.
However carrier wifi in stadiums
Mark,
A couple of things, first that kind of utilization isn't feasible once
penetration rates in dense areas reach certain levels. There's a reason
that NTT Docomo moved more than 70% of their data traffic to the 3.5 GHz
band and that reason is that there's not (nor will there be) enough
On 30/May/18 17:11, McBride, Mack wrote:
> In high density urban areas last mile infrastructure (mostly copper) is
> considerably better than 4G.
> Localized carrier powered wifi is good as well but it is not and should not
> be confused with 4G.
I think it depends on what it is you're
In high density urban areas last mile infrastructure (mostly copper) is
considerably better than 4G.
Localized carrier powered wifi is good as well but it is not and should not be
confused with 4G.
Mack
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ben
Thank you Mark for your excellent firsthand account.
I’ve observed this - the developing world (better? Same meaning but hey) does
not miss copper infrastructure. That was always bad and was always going to be
bad now that 4G is here. There’s just zero reason now. It’s an anchor.
-Ben
> On
Hey -
One question on MVPN behavior. Will the PIM JOIN from the customer will be
received on all the MVPN members - encapsulated MDT group. ? Can we expect to
see the state in all the MDT members? Thought it will be seen only on RPF
neighbor?
In our scenario, the multicast VRF in PE should
25 matches
Mail list logo
