A couple of the big draws to Mikrotik (aside from the performance and features
you get for the price) are Winbox, Torch, and real-time stats. Great features
that don't really have an equal elsewhere.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
ht
Your last paragraph hits it on the head. I hear people bash Mikrotik, but then
I've heard many times people with vendor's gear complaining just as much
(just about different things) and they're paying significantly more for that
privilege.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Sol
Not much limiting them to the sub-10G world, though.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Jared Mauch"
To: "Seth Mattinen"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2018
On Sat, 23 Jun 2018 12:27:35 -0400, "Jean | ddostest.me via NANOG" said:
> Because, Apple adds a 25 ms artifical penalty to ipv4 dns resolution.
>
> https://ma.ttias.be/apple-favours-ipv6-gives-ipv4-a-25ms-penalty/
Umm.. It's 3 year old news that Apple implemented Happy Eyeballs.
And if you read
in small corners, e.g. home, i use ubiquiti erx. i use the cli for
config, and the gooey for watching traffic levels in pretty colors.
they play well with both concast and at&t u-verse ipv4 and ipv6.
in san jose $dayjob, i am stuck with a cisco asa for cpe, a 1990s retro
antique providing job sec
From an Apple device point of view, ipv6 should be faster than ipv4
where both are available.
Because, Apple adds a 25 ms artifical penalty to ipv4 dns resolution.
https://ma.ttias.be/apple-favours-ipv6-gives-ipv4-a-25ms-penalty/
So if you test facebook from a Mac/iPhone/iPad, it will definite
> On Jun 22, 2018, at 9:31 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
> On 22/Jun/18 15:05, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote:
>
>> I’m not really sure “you get what you pay for” … compare with OpenWRT … you
>> have frequent updates, even in days when some important security flaw is
>> discovered, as
7 matches
Mail list logo
