If there is someone listening from NTT engineering, would you kindly write
back?
The IP NOC is unable to locate anyone because it’s Sunday so I thought I might
try here.
Thanks!
J~
On 07/15/2018 10:56 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
On 2018-07-15 19:00, Raymond Burkholder wrote:
On 07/15/2018 09:03 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
On 2018-07-14 22:05, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
About OVS, i didnt looked much at it, as i thought it is not suitable
for BNG purposes,
like for
søn. 15. jul. 2018 18.57 skrev Denys Fedoryshchenko :
>
> Openflow IMO by nature is built to do complex matching, and for example
> for
> typical 12-tuple it is 750-4000 entries max in switches, but you go to
> l2 only matching
> which was possible at moment i tested, on my experience, only on
On 2018-07-15 19:00, Raymond Burkholder wrote:
On 07/15/2018 09:03 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
On 2018-07-14 22:05, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
I have considered OpenFlow and might do that. We have OpenFlow
capable
switches and I may be able to offload the work to the switch
hardware.
But I
Den 15/07/2018 kl. 18.00 skrev Raymond Burkholder:
But I think a clarification on Baldur's speed requirements is needed.
He indicates that there are a bunch of locations: do each of the
locations require 10G throughput, or was the throughput defined for
all sites in aggregate? If the
On 07/15/2018 09:03 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
On 2018-07-14 22:05, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
I have considered OpenFlow and might do that. We have OpenFlow capable
switches and I may be able to offload the work to the switch hardware.
But I also consider this solution harder to get right
Hi Baldur,
Based on the information you provided, CPE connects to the POI via
different service provider (access network provider / middle man) before it
reaches your network/POP.
With this construct, you are typically responsible for IP allocation and
session authentication via DHCP (option
On 2018-07-14 22:05, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
I have considered OpenFlow and might do that. We have OpenFlow capable
switches and I may be able to offload the work to the switch hardware.
But I also consider this solution harder to get right than the idea of
using Linux with tap devices. Also it
On 2018-07-15 06:09, Jérôme Nicolle wrote:
Hi Baldur,
Le 14/07/2018 à 14:13, Baldur Norddahl a écrit :
I am investigating Linux as a BNG
As we say in France, it's like your trying to buttfuck flies (a local
saying standing for "reinventing the wheel for no practical reason").
You can say
Hi Baldur,
These guys made a PPPoE client for VPP - you could probably extend
that into a PPP server:
https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/9181
https://github.com/raydonetworks/vpp-pppoeclient
Although, I would agree that deploying PPP now is a bit of a step
backwards and IPoE is the way to be
I was going to say... in my experience (I've been to a lot of the
Arizona electronics sites, having grown up around broadcasting) that
most of the microwave equipment in use was for Bell. That was by far
the most populous tower on any mountain top. The broadcasters don't
send their signals
On Sat, Jul 14, 2018, at 17:07, Keith Stokes wrote:
> There’s a lot less backhoe fade with microwave. ;-)
>
> Kidding aside, I’m sure there are plenty of scenarios where microwave
> makes better sense than fiber especially since it’s a lot easier to
HFT or any low-latency app is such a
12 matches
Mail list logo
