> You just need to fire any contractor that allows a server with
> sensitive data out to an unknown address on the Internet. Security
> 101.
'cept the goal is not unemployed contractors
On 10/7/18 11:47 PM, Naslund, Steve wrote:
That is true provided that you accept that some people may not be able to
respond without the packet getting fragmented due to tunneling or a million
other reasons they may not support that MTU. Nonstandard MTU has always and
seems will continue to
You just need to fire any contractor that allows a server with sensitive data
out to an unknown address on the Internet. Security 101.
Steven Naslund
>From: Eric Kuhnke
>
>many contractors *do* have sensitive data on their networks with a gateway
>out to the public Internet.
>On 10/5/18 1:53 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> If you don’t want fragmented IPv6 UDP responses use
>
> server ::/0 { edns-udp-size 1232; };
>
> That’s 1280 - IPv6 header - UDP header. Anything bigger than that can
> theoretically be fragmented. You will then have to deal with PMTUD
>
A few cases come to mind. I also think there are lots of alerts that will not
send people screaming into the streets. 9/11 did not really have that effect
in most places and it took quite some time for word to spread to people who did
not have full time media access. You also have to
> So I tend not to be in a big rush to look at those alerts, actually I
> think I turned them off which in that case was an option.
i turned them off long ago.
i did get a presidential alert in november '16. turned out to be a very
serious disaster.
randy
On October 7, 2018 at 15:49 fredbaker.i...@gmail.com (Fred Baker) wrote:
>
> > On Oct 7, 2018, at 12:23 PM, b...@theworld.com wrote:
> >
> > That was one advantage of the old air raid siren system, it was difficult
> > to ignore and required nothing special to receive (hearing
> >
On Oct 7, 2018, at 12:23 PM, b...@theworld.com wrote:
> That was one advantage of the old air raid siren system, it was
> difficult to ignore and required nothing special to receive (hearing
> impaired excepted.)
_Wired_ has an interesting history of the various networked and
standalone national
On 10/07/2018 03:49 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
On Oct 7, 2018, at 12:23 PM, b...@theworld.com wrote:
That was one advantage of the old air raid siren system, it was difficult to
ignore and required nothing special to receive (hearing
impaired excepted.)
Where I grew up, the “Civil Defense Warning”
> On Oct 7, 2018, at 12:23 PM, b...@theworld.com wrote:
>
> That was one advantage of the old air raid siren system, it was difficult to
> ignore and required nothing special to receive (hearing
> impaired excepted.)
Where I grew up, the “Civil Defense Warning” was used for air raids, nuclear
Hopefully Google and Amazon product engineers are listening: EAS/NWS
alert messages could come over your various devices to help the
consumer...
The NEST Protect smoke alarms would particularly be useful for NWS
Alerts (i.e. they're loud and could broadcast "TORNADO! SEEK SHELTER
IMMEDIATELY!")
Re: EAS alert, people not being reached
That was one advantage of the old air raid siren system, it was
difficult to ignore and required nothing special to receive (hearing
impaired excepted.)
I recall in NYC as a kid you were expected (maybe legally required,
not sure) to head off the streets
On 10/04/2018 03:13 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
--- eric.kuh...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Eric Kuhnke
many contractors *do* have sensitive data on their
networks with a gateway out to the public Internet.
I could definitely imagine that happening.
scott
13 matches
Mail list logo
