Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019, 5:05 AM Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan wrote: > @Töma Gavrichenkov > > In theory, I can easily recall a few cases in my life when going >> through just 50 words was quite enough for a judgment. > > > How can you be so sure that you didn't fuck up none of the lives of these >

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 12:28:21PM +0530, Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan wrote a message of 111 lines which said: > Just gone through all your replies. And apparently you did not read them and did not take any lesson in it. > Literally everyone attacking me here. In the current thread, NOT ONE

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

On 18/Feb/19 08:58, Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan wrote: > > It sucks when you sit on the "humiliation" chair when the mistake is > not yours. I'm a farmer's son from a third world country, yet trying > to contribute to this world in the way I can.  > > Asking for feedback is not a mistake. But I

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

You are so missing the point. This isn't about your interaction with John Levine. You came her asking for feedback (after an extensive and very unprofessional rant) and you got it. Just because you don't like the feedback doesn't mean people are "attacking" you. This is so irrelevant to NANOG.

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

Just gone through all your replies. Literally everyone attacking me here. Could you tell me why? Because I have been rude to John Levine, right? So you all think you have the right to give me "mob justice". But as an innocent man I have to suffer all John Levine attacks because he is a most

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 07:33:32AM +0530, Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan wrote a message of 515 lines which said: > My name is Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan. I'm the guy who proposed SMTP > over TLS on Port 26 Besides all the excellent remarks that were made here (and I seriously urge you to read

RE: fs.com dwdm equipment

For managing them, do you use the actual software they ship with it? When I last checked, it requires a MSSQL instance with hard coded “sa” user access which was an immediate no go for me. I still have them sitting in a box in our lab as a teaching aid really. From: NANOG On Behalf Of Michel

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

Agreed. I’ve never seen someone so excited to have reinvented TMDA from the 1990’s. Please, tell us more how the Internet will readdress itself to meet your fascinating solution. Can we go back to talking about network engineering now? Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 17, 2019, at 19:21,

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

> On Feb 17, 2019, at 19:26, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > I was thinking more of the guy who was convinced that each octet in an IPV4 > address could store 0 through 256. That's what the overflow flag is for, right?

Re: fs.com dwdm equipment

We’ve purchased many SFP modules from fs.com for Cisco gear, and the only problem we run into is that Cisco IOS seem unwilling to expose the error counters via SNMP. This is kind of annoying, because that’s how we get early warning of fiber problems. I suspect IOS does this

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

I made it a few dozen pages into the white paper, it's 200+ pages long and TBH just rambles on about what spam bots are and other basic definitions. No one who doesn't know all that will even attempt to read your paper I don't think. THAT SAID, I got to the point where it required CAPTCHAs of

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

On 18/02/2019 04:03, Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan wrote: If that is the case you should have a startup worth at least $10M with numerous VC banging down your door. If not, you need to ask yourself the question "why not?". -Hank Hello Everyone, My name is Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan. I'm

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 9:23 PM wrote: > > > [Today's discussion is about whether I solved the spam problem. Not > about how > > I'm gonna distribute the solution] > > You apparently don't understand that how the solution gets distributed is a > very important part of whether the solution will

Re: fs.com dwdm equipment

They have solid product and good support, I bought many SFP+ for Nexus, Juniper, Force10 and never had a problem with them. HTH Best regards, David S. e. da...@zeromail.us w. pnyet.web.id p. 087881216110 On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 9:23 AM Michel

RE: TATA/AS6453 BGP communities

> From: Eric Dugas [mailto:edu...@unknowndevice.ca] > Sent: Monday, 18 February 2019 1:54 PM > To: Tim Warnock > Cc: NANOG list > Subject: Re: TATA/AS6453 BGP communities > > There you go: https://www.scribd.com/document/399871041/TATA-AS6453- > BGP-Communities > Legendary! Thanks :)

Re: TATA/AS6453 BGP communities

There you go: https://www.scribd.com/document/399871041/TATA-AS6453-BGP-Communities On Feb 17 2019, at 10:50 pm, Tim Warnock wrote: > Hey, > > Anyone have a list of BGP communities for TATA/AS6453? Mainly chasing geo > tags. > Their peeringdb contacts are non-responsive. > Thanks > Tim. >

TATA/AS6453 BGP communities

Hey, Anyone have a list of BGP communities for TATA/AS6453? Mainly chasing geo tags. Their peeringdb contacts are non-responsive. Thanks Tim.

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

On Sun, 17 Feb 2019 22:16:50 -0500, Jon Lewis said: > Anyone else having flashbacks to Jim Fleming telling us about how IPv8 was > the final ultimate solution to IPv4 runout? I was thinking more of the guy who was convinced that each octet in an IPV4 address could store 0 through 256.

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 07:33:32 +0530, Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan said: > My name is Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan. I'm the guy who proposed SMTP over > TLS on Port 26 Unfortunately, your attempt there didn't demonstrate an in-depth knowledge of the email ecology of the sort needed to *actually* solve

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

Anyone else having flashbacks to Jim Fleming telling us about how IPv8 was the final ultimate solution to IPv4 runout? On Mon, 18 Feb 2019, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: ... and of all those, once you solve v6 multihoming (possibly with ipv9) do come back to nanog where I'm sure it will be

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

Not to derail this highly relevant thread, and forgive my ignorance, but what's the issue with IPv6 multihoming? On Sun, Feb 17, 2019, 10:01 PM Suresh Ramasubramanian ... and of all those, once you solve v6 multihoming (possibly with ipv9) > do come back to nanog where I'm sure it will be

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

On Mon, 18 Feb 2019, Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan wrote: Hello Everyone, My name is Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan. I'm the guy who proposed SMTP over TLS on Port 26 last month. I'm also the guy who attacked (???) John Levine. Today I have something to show you.  Long story short I solved the

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

... and of all those, once you solve v6 multihoming (possibly with ipv9) do come back to nanog where I'm sure it will be operational. On 18/02/19, 8:23 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Michel Py" wrote: > Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan wrote : > I solved the email spam problem. Oh, this

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

I can't get past all the blabbering to bother reviewing stuff. But why does this guy remind me of Shiva Ayyadurai - you know, the "inventor of email." Seriously - isn't the general rule to start with a demonstration, not a polemic?  (Shiva actually built an email system.  And people actually

RE: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

> Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan wrote : > I solved the email spam problem. Oh, this is wonderful news. There are plenty of other problems that need your brilliance. In no specific order : - Global warming. - Nuclear proliferation. - Peace in the middle east. - World hunger. - IPv6 multihoming. We

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

There's this small percentage of cranks that are brilliant Doc Emmett Brown level inventors who come up with truly brilliant products and solutions. And then there's the much larger percentage of cranks that have a bad idea that they're prepared to defend to the last. Very well then .. On Mon,

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

This is truly awful and off topic for network engineering. Please stop and try to listen to the people who are offering you feedback. On other lists. Not here. Thanks! T On Sun, Feb 17, 2019, 21:05 Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan Hello Everyone, > > My name is Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan. I'm the

Re: fs.com dwdm equipment

I tryed SFP, MUX, DEMUX and OADM, all working as expected. Le dim. 17 févr. 2019 19 h 18, Samir Rana a écrit : > Hello All, > > Does anybody have experience with fs.com dwdm equipment in their > production environment? Are you they working without any issue? How's their > warranty support if

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

You literally lost my interest in reading your solution when I realized that 99.999% of this post is just you railing against people. People are right, if you can’t get my attention in 50 words, then either your solution isn’t a solution but a marketing ploy, or you need someone who

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

I'd be a lot more inclined to read your paper if you weren't so self-righteous about it. Rehashing all the times people disagreed with ("attacked") you is a poor way to encourage others to earnestly engage with your ideas. On Sun, Feb 17, 2019, 9:06 PM Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan Hello Everyone,

Re: A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

On 02/17/2019 06:03 PM, Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan wrote: Hello Everyone, - John

A Zero Spam Mail System [Feedback Request]

Hello Everyone, My name is Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan. I'm the guy who proposed SMTP over TLS on Port 26 last month. I'm also the guy who attacked (???) John Levine. Today I have something to show you. Long

fs.com dwdm equipment

Hello All, Does anybody have experience with fs.com dwdm equipment in their production environment? Are you they working without any issue? How's their warranty support if the issue arises? Thanks in advance for all the answers and help.