webauthn

2019-03-22 Thread Michael Thomas
I know it's a little tangential, but it's a huge operational issue for network operations too. Have any NANOG folks been paying attention to webauthn? i didn't know about until yesterday, though i wrote a proof of concept of something that looks a lot like webauthn in 2012. The thing that is

FW: softlayer.com

2019-03-22 Thread Travis Garrison
Traceroute from here if it helps Tracing route to 138-43-128-1.reserved.highland.net [138.43.128.1] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1<1 ms<1 ms<1 ms [REDACTED] 2<1 ms<1 ms<1 ms [REDACTED] 3 1 ms 1 ms<1 ms [REDACTED] 4 1 ms<1 ms<1 ms

Contact at Spectrum/Charter (LA area)

2019-03-22 Thread Lee Burton
Looking for a contact re: an event we are running. Thanks in advance, Lee Burton lbur...@mrow.org lee.bur...@lfest.org

Weekly Routing Table Report

2019-03-22 Thread Routing Analysis Role Account
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to

Re: softlayer.com

2019-03-22 Thread Siyuan Miao
Perhaps it won't work because their customer support will ask you for bi-directional traceroute and refused to forward to backbone team. Then they'll say it's not their fault and you can see the packet is dropped outside our network. Here's a sample traceroute from SoftLayer Washington, San Jose

Re: softlayer.com

2019-03-22 Thread Nikolas Geyer
This is the best approach. Have run into this problem a few times and had zero success getting the filters removed without having SL customers log tickets with support. Verbiage needs to be “this prefix is blocked, please escalate to your backbone team”. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 22, 2019,

Re: softlayer.com

2019-03-22 Thread Forrest Christian (List Account)
Another idea... Have you tried reaching out to some of the blocked sites? They likely have better contact information than is available publicly, especially a larger one like indeed. On Thu, Mar 21, 2019, 3:41 PM John Alcock wrote: > Still looking for anyone from softlayer.com > > It has been

XO trace route request | Netherlands

2019-03-22 Thread Van Dyk, Donovan via NANOG
Hello all, If there's someone out there on XO's network, preferably in the Netherlands area, could you send me a traceroute to the following IP: 164.140.35.37 XO's Looking Glass seems to be broken. The BGP throws up an invalid error on the syntax error for its own input. Pings/ traceroutes

Re: softlayer.com

2019-03-22 Thread Brian Rak
I've been trying to reach them regarding an abuse issue, and have similarly had no actual luck in reaching their abuse/noc contacts. On 3/21/2019 9:07 PM, and...@paolucci.ca wrote: SoftLayer was aquirred by IBM, maybe reaching out to their NOC or support would be fruitful. IBM's DNS team is

"Under the hood" at ARIN (was: ARIN upgrade completed)

2019-03-22 Thread John Curran
And for those looking into a little insight "under the hood" of the new ARIN Online system & website, Andy Newton wrote a short blog that highlights some of the architecture and framework decisions we made – https://teamarin.net/2019/03/19/under-the-hood-of-the-new-arin-net/ FYI, /John John