Do you have sources for the ~90% T-Mobile IPv6? Not arguing, but to use that as
a source myself when spreading the IPv6 good word.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Jared
Jeffrey,
Thanks. A good start, but under-scoped. When you are purchasing IP number
blocks whatever source you use; a marketplace, a broker, a single source
should provide you with a compelling history on a number block REPUTATION
that includes all the attributes listed below and then some. Some
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 8:20 AM Torres, Matt via NANOG
wrote:
> due diligence research on an IPv4 block [...] what results from those
checks should cause us to walk away?
Hi Matt,
I think it also depends on your intended use. If you want a flawlessly
clean block you can use for anything, you'll
Does anyone know what IP to Geo database provider DirectTV uses for their
streaming platform?
Nick
--
Checked by SOPHOS http://www.sophos.com
Hi,
While I think #3 is important, it depends on your use of the end-block, and
those entries can sometimes be cleaned up with some work. If the block is
listed, that would certainly lower my buying price I am willing to pay for the
block. I did buy a block once in the ARIN region which
Hi NANOG,
Looking for a contact from AS3320 Deutsche Telekom to ask a question
about their routing policy/filtering causing that some globally routed
prefixes aren't seen in AS3320.
Kind regards,
Andrey Kostin
The issue isn’t with Spamhaus itself per se, more providers who implement
automated edge filters based on those lists and then take a long time to get
removed manually.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 3, 2019, at 1:40 PM, Eric Dugas
mailto:edu...@unknowndevice.ca>> wrote:
I cleaned two blocks
I cleaned two blocks last year with Spamhaus and others. Took me less than two
weeks and Spamhaus were the quickest of the bunch (we're talking about a full
or two business days). PSN can be tricky, same for Netflix and whatnot but I
always put these new blocks in "quarantine" for a couple of
A big +1 to checking Spamhaus, specifically their DROP and EDROP lists. These
two lists are what causes us most pain when acquiring IPv4 space as a lot of
providers put auto blocking in place based on these two which can be difficult
to get removed.
I won’t even contemplate prefixes on either
> On Apr 3, 2019, at 12:04 PM, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
>
> On Wed, 03 Apr 2019 11:58:23 -0400, Jared Mauch said:
>
>> Mostly curious if you are doing IPv6 if you see that slowing your need for v4
>> or if they are growing at the same rate.
>
> And remember kids - the more you can push off
On Wed, 03 Apr 2019 11:58:23 -0400, Jared Mauch said:
> Mostly curious if you are doing IPv6 if you see that slowing your need for v4
> or if they are growing at the same rate.
And remember kids - the more you can push off to native IPv6, the longer you can
push off an upgrade to your CGNAT box.
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 03:45:17AM -0400, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Apr 2019 23:53:06 -0700, Ben Cannon said:
> > A 100/100 enterprise connection can easily support hundreds of desktop
> > users
> > if not more. It???s a lot of bandwidth even today.
>
> And what happens when a
> On Apr 3, 2019, at 11:20 AM, Torres, Matt via NANOG wrote:
>
> All,
> Side stepping a migration to IPv6 debate…. I’d like to hear advise from the
> group about performing due diligence research on an IPv4 block before
> purchasing it on the secondary market (on behalf of an end-user
I used this gentleman’s Powershell script and modified it slightly to check a
block last summer. The broker we were using said that they also did their due
diligence on the addresses, but I wanted to do our own because of the cost of
the IPs.
On Wed, 03 Apr 2019 15:20:17 -, "Torres, Matt via NANOG" said:
> 3. Check SORBS blacklisting. It should not show up except maybe the DUHL
> list(?). If it does, walk away.
SORBS isn't the only place to check. As an example, if Spamhaus doesn't have
nice things to say about the block,
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 10:34 AM John Alcock wrote:
> Well,
>
> I did all three above and still had issues. I am still having issues. I
> had to contact many people to get off of various blacklists, etc. These
> are lists that are not publish and you will not know until you start using
> the
Well,
I did all three above and still had issues. I am still having issues. I
had to contact many people to get off of various blacklists, etc. These
are lists that are not publish and you will not know until you start using
the space.
Luckily, I have had great help from the list here in
Hi all,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 10:59:18AM -0400, Jay Borkenhagen wrote:
> I urge folks facing similar problems to publish RPKI ROAs for their IP
> resources. [snip] the verifiable statements in RPKI ROAs can be
> attributed to you as the actual resource holder, thus helping folks
> base their
All,
Side stepping a migration to IPv6 debate I'd like to hear advise from the
group about performing due diligence research on an IPv4 block before
purchasing it on the secondary market (on behalf of an end-user company). My
research has branched into two questions: a) What 'checks' should
Hi nanog,
With help from China Unicom (as4837) and from folks in other key
places around the 'net, I am happy to report that this route
mis-origination has now been successfully resolved. Thanks, all!
I urge folks facing similar problems to publish RPKI ROAs for their IP
resources. I started
I am also surprised. However, we have had a total of 5 complaints about
network speed over a 3 year period.
One possible reason is that because they own the infrastructure collectively
and pay for the bandwidth directly (I just manage everything for them), they
are prepared to put up with
Greetings -
If there is anyone from Gannett on the list, I'd appreciate it if you
would reach out. You've got some Route53 monitoring traffic directed
at one of our AWS ELBs.
Thanks,
Ed
Paul,
I have hard time seeing how you aren't maxing out that circuit. We see
about 2.3 mbps average per customer at peak with a primarily residential
user base. That would about 575 mbps average at peak for 250 users on our
network so how do we use 575 but you say your users don't even top 100
On Tue, 02 Apr 2019 23:53:06 -0700, Ben Cannon said:
> A 100/100 enterprise connection can easily support hundreds of desktop users
> if not more. Itâs a lot of bandwidth even today.
And what happens when a significant fraction of those users fire up Netflix with
an HD stream?
We're
A 100/100 enterprise connection can easily support hundreds of desktop users if
not more. It’s a lot of bandwidth even today.
-Ben
> On Apr 2, 2019, at 10:35 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2 Apr 2019, Paul Nash wrote:
>>
>> FWIW, I have a 250 subscribers sitting on a 100M fiber
25 matches
Mail list logo
