On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 13:39:56 -0500, Tom Beecher said:
> They are essentially equating 'business' with 'VPN provider'.
Not at all surprised.
Many moons ago, I had a Tor *relay* running on one machine in my home network,
and Hulu decided that my connections from a *different* home machine were
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 11:47 AM Mike Bolitho wrote:
> This is was my thought as well. People always get up in arms about how
> it's "Public DNS!" but it's really not. It's just well known and used
> because it's easy to remember.
>
I ask the users of 4.2.2.x where it is stated by the owners of
Hello Nanog,
Does anyone here know a contact for Twitters peering group that is not
from Peeringdb? I have been having issues the last several days first not
receiving any routes and now the session failing. This is over the NYIIX
peering if that helps at all. Any information is appreciated.
Just curious what ASICs/platforms/NICs are supported? I didn't see any
information about anything on the wiki.
--
Tim
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019, 7:31 PM Robert Bays wrote:
> For the open source version we replaced our proprietary routing protocol
> stack with FRR.
>
> Since the AT acquisition we
For the open source version we replaced our proprietary routing protocol stack
with FRR.
Since the AT acquisition we have also added support for a few merchant
silicon platforms in a hybrid software/hardware forwarding plane. ONIE images
are available from the same link.
Cheers,
Robert.
Dude, frankly Zero Hedge is a joke. Facts and respect are as foreign to them as
to a certain American President.
From: NANOG on behalf of b...@theworld.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:43 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: 99% of HK internet traffic goes
The vast majority of Iranian ISPs' international transit connectivity is
through AS12880 DCI , which is a government run telecom authority. Google
"AS12880 DCI Iran" for more info. DCI is also responsible for layer 2
transport and DWDM services for smaller downstream ISPs, on other
international
On 11/19/19 1:43 PM, b...@theworld.com wrote:
Is this plausible?
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/heres-real-reason-why-hong-kong-authorities-are-desperate-regain-control-university
or
http://tinyurl.com/slwchx8
uh...
Zerohedge has been (at worst) a Russian asset for a good
HKIX is definitely the incumbent IXP in that region, but I'd reckon that most
high volume interconnection will take place in facilities like Mega-iAdvantage
or Equinix HK1 via PNI.
Plus there are several alternative IXPs in Hong Kong that also handle
undisclosed amounts of traffic.
Is this plausible?
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/heres-real-reason-why-hong-kong-authorities-are-desperate-regain-control-university
or
http://tinyurl.com/slwchx8
--
-Barry Shein
Software Tool & Die| b...@theworld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com
On Tuesday, November 19, 2019 1:35 PM, Mike Bolitho
said…
“How many of (my) clients have miss-typed something and sent their data,
unknowingly, to a 3rd party host? (Who’s fault would that be?)
Yours? They paid you to set up their network properly and you set it up to
resolve to Level 3. So
They are essentially equating 'business' with 'VPN provider'.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 1:25 PM Matt Hoppes <
mattli...@rivervalleyinternet.net> wrote:
> Why are "businesses" not allowed to watch HULU?
>
> On 11/19/19 1:17 PM, Doug McIntyre wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:55:01AM -0600,
>
> How many of (my) clients have miss-typed something and sent their data,
> unknowingly, to a 3rd party host? (Who’s fault would that be?)
Yours? They paid you to set up their network properly and you set it up to
resolve to Level 3. So if they "unknowingly sent their data" to a third
party
Hulu is the worst-run streaming service, mostly because they don't cooperate
with ISPs in the least.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Doug McIntyre"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday,
Why are "businesses" not allowed to watch HULU?
On 11/19/19 1:17 PM, Doug McIntyre wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:55:01AM -0600, Blake Hudson wrote:
Doug, out of curiosity, what does Hulu do once they have classified your
IP ranges as "business class"? Charge customers a different rate?
On Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:49 PM, Mike Bolitho
said…
“This is was my thought as well. People always get up in arms about how it's
"Public DNS!" but it's really not. It's just well known and used because it's
easy to remember”
I am not against their “securing” their hosts. It costs them
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:55:01AM -0600, Blake Hudson wrote:
> Doug, out of curiosity, what does Hulu do once they have classified your
> IP ranges as "business class"? Charge customers a different rate? Offer
> different content? Refuse service?
They won't let any of my customers connect,
This is was my thought as well. People always get up in arms about how it's
"Public DNS!" but it's really not. It's just well known and used because
it's easy to remember.
- Mike Bolitho
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 9:28 AM Ryan, Spencer
wrote:
> Are you a CL/L3 customer? Those resolvers have only
Apologies for the off topic email but I am trying to get in touch with
someone at AT Security who has a clue.
Received three text messages on my Verizon Wireless phone from my wife's
number which were from AT with links to someone's tech visit ticket which
gave me access to their services and
Hello,
Any recommendations about Dell S4200 switches with their OS10 Cisco like OS?
Pricing is very attractive. They claim to support 1.5M bgp routes.
Anyone has any experience with Dell’s switches?
Can I rely on them in production network?
Thanks
Best regards,
Dmitry Sherman
[X]
On 11/18/19 12:45, Marshall, Quincy wrote:
> This is mostly informational and may have already hit this group. My
> google-foo failed me if so.
>
>
>
> I discovered that the CenturyLink/Level(3) public DNS (4.2.2.2, etc) are
> spoofing all domains. If the hostname begins with a “w” and does
Wow, news to me, and it's worse than you thought. They're spoofing
responses for ALL non-existent domains, not just those starting with a "w":
langsam:~# whois unregistereddomaintest.com | head -1
No match for "UNREGISTEREDDOMAINTEST.COM".
langsam:~# dig +short a unregistereddomaintest.com
Are you a CL/L3 customer? Those resolvers have only ever been for “customers”
even though they would resolve for anyone. They started injecting NXDOMAIN
redirects a while ago for non-customers.
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Marshall, Quincy
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2019 12:45 PM
Subject:
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 12:07 AM Mel Beckman wrote:
>
> Frontier and Verizon have been doing it for years. They have simply thumbed
> their noses at NXDOMAIN. All in the name of capturing data and eyeballs By
> Any Means Necessary.
>
Verizon USED to do this on the former UUnet customer cache
On 11/18/19 12:45 PM, Marshall, Quincy wrote:
I discovered that the CenturyLink/Level(3) public DNS (4.2.2.2, etc) are
spoofing all domains. If the hostname begins with a “w” and does not
exist in the authoritative zone these hosts will return two Akamai hosts.
As far as I know, this has been
Frontier and Verizon have been doing it for years. They have simply thumbed
their noses at NXDOMAIN. All in the name of capturing data and eyeballs By Any
Means Necessary.
-mel
On Nov 19, 2019, at 8:00 AM, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 10:57, Patrick Schultz wrote:
On Tuesday, November 19, 2019 10:42 AM Ryan, Spencer…
“Are you a CL/L3 customer?”
I am a legacy L(3) customer.
The availability of their AnyCast NS is public from my nets. I was on a my
home TWC circuit when I ran the provided lookups.
I have used the L(3) NS, in a pinch, because of their
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 10:57, Patrick Schultz
wrote:
> Just to weigh in: Here in Germany, the largest internet provider (Deutsche
> Telekom) did the same thing.
> It's basically just a "search guide", it redirects you to a search page
> and assumes you just had a typo in the URL.
>
> Telekom
Just to weigh in: Here in Germany, the largest internet provider (Deutsche
Telekom) did the same thing.
It's basically just a "search guide", it redirects you to a search page and
assumes you just had a typo in the URL.
Telekom stopped doing that in April, after a user reported them to the
Le mar. 19 nov. 2019 à 16:36, Marshall, Quincy
a écrit :
>
> I discovered that the CenturyLink/Level(3) public DNS (4.2.2.2, etc) are
> spoofing all domains. If the hostname begins with a “w” and does not exist in
> the authoritative zone these hosts will return two Akamai hosts.
>
>
This is mostly informational and may have already hit this group. My google-foo
failed me if so.
I discovered that the CenturyLink/Level(3) public DNS (4.2.2.2, etc) are
spoofing all domains. If the hostname begins with a "w" and does not exist in
the authoritative zone these hosts will return
Not that I specifically recall since late 90s. All the local problems
became nationwide.
If you want to start one, sign me up.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 6:53 PM Randy Bush wrote:
> > dear lazynet. is there a list, irc, slack, ... for ops in the
> > southern bay area? need to find/discuss
32 matches
Mail list logo
