On 2019-11-25 20:26, Brandon Martin wrote:
On 11/26/19 4:36 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
I get that some people still don't like it, but the answer is IPv6.
Or, folks can keep playing NAT games, etc. But one wonders at what
point
rolling out IPv6 costs less than all the fun you get with [CG]NAT.
On 11/26/19 4:36 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
I get that some people still don't like it, but the answer is IPv6. Or,
folks can keep playing NAT games, etc. But one wonders at what point
rolling out IPv6 costs less than all the fun you get with [CG]NAT.
If it weren't for the ongoing need to
On 2019-11-25 1:47 PM, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 06:46:52 +1100, Mark Andrews said:
On 26 Nov 2019, at 03:53, Dmitry Sherman wrote:
 I believe it’s Eyeball network’s matter to free IPv4 blocks and move to
v6.
It requires both sides to move to IPv6. Why should the
Since there were people who asked about the outcome:
The tech contact email address (ipaddressing@level3) goes nowhere. One
of the admin contact emails (ipadmin@centurylink) got a response.
They suggested I put in a trouble ticket instead of approaching it as an
administrative task (which is
Most eyeball networks (by organization count) don't have a /16 in the first
place, much less one to give.
Obviously something like 90% of the population is in the top 10 providers and
the rest of the population is in the other several thousand providers.
(Numbers are out of thin air, but
On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 06:46:52 +1100, Mark Andrews said:
> > On 26 Nov 2019, at 03:53, Dmitry Sherman wrote:
> >
> >  I believe itâs Eyeball networkâs matter to free IPv4 blocks and
> > move to v6.
> It requires both sides to move to IPv6. Why should the cost of maintaining
> working
The two things feed each other. Big content networks have had IPv6 for
years now, and the mobile phone networks are primarily, if not
exclusively IPv6 on the inside.
Adding IPv6 now helps push the cycle forward, whether you are an
eyeball, content, or other network.
Doug
On 11/25/19 11:50
If there's anyone from Consolidated (legacy Enventis) lurking, could you
please reach out to me off-list?
You're advertising a prefix from a Tier 1 to another Tier 1 which is
causing occasional issues for us.
E-mails to noc@ and repair@ have gone unanswered (and admittedly I'm not
a direct
Because we can’t only use ipv6 on the boxes, each box with ipv6 must have IPv4
until the last eyeball broadband user will have ipv6 support.
Best regards,
Dmitry Sherman
Interhost Networks
www.interhost.co.il
dmi...@interhost.net
Mob: 054-3181182
Sent from Steve's creature
[X]
On 25 Nov 2019,
It requires both sides to move to IPv6. Why should the cost of maintaining
working networks be borne alone by the eyeball networks? That is what is
mostly happening today with CGN.
Every server that offers services to the public should be making them available
over IPv6. Most of the CDNs
But IPv4 is ripe. You have just become accustomed to the stench of NAT that
you don’t realise it.
--
Mark Andrews
> On 26 Nov 2019, at 05:31, Jeff Shultz wrote:
>
> Hard to say that something that is in full implementation and use is dead.
>
>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 9:21 AM Owen DeLong
> RIPE isn’t dead… Just IPv4.
--- jeffshu...@sctcweb.com wrote:
From: Jeff Shultz
Hard to say that something that is in full implementation
and use is dead.
---
Ok... In the process of dying a slow, painful, agonizing,
brutal,
I think the context was referring to RIPE's v4 space being dead.
>
> Hard to say that something that is in full implementation and use is dead.
>
> >
> > RIPE isn’t dead… Just IPv4.
> >
> > Owen
> >
> > >
> > > RIP RIPE
> > >>
> > >> Just received a mail that RIPE is out of IPv4:
Hard to say that something that is in full implementation and use is dead.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 9:21 AM Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> RIPE isn’t dead… Just IPv4.
>
> Owen
>
>
> > On Nov 25, 2019, at 08:03 , Ryland Kremeier
> > wrote:
> >
> > RIP RIPE
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> >
RIP RIPE('s IPV4)*
-Original Message-
From: Owen DeLong
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2019 11:19 AM
To: Ryland Kremeier
Cc: Andy Ringsmuth ; NANOG mailing list
Subject: Re: RIPE our of IPv4
RIPE isn’t dead… Just IPv4.
Owen
> On Nov 25, 2019, at 08:03 , Ryland Kremeier
> wrote:
>
RIPE isn’t dead… Just IPv4.
Owen
> On Nov 25, 2019, at 08:03 , Ryland Kremeier
> wrote:
>
> RIP RIPE
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG On Behalf Of Andy Ringsmuth
> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2019 9:58 AM
> To: NANOG mailing list
> Subject: Re: RIPE our of IPv4
>
>
>
>>
I believe it’s Eyeball network’s matter to free IPv4 blocks and move to v6.
Best regards,
Dmitry Sherman
[X]
On 25 Nov 2019, at 18:08, Billy Crook wrote:
Huh. I guess we get to go home early today then? And look into that whole
"Aye Pee Vee Sicks" thing next week aye boss?
On Mon, Nov
Thanks
I am lurking on this mail list. Sometimes is hard to decipher whats
goin on. Always interesting. You guys are awesome.
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 at 16:57, Donald Eastlake wrote:
>
> I think it is less historic than when IANA ran out of blocks to
> delegate to the regional registries.
>
Huh. I guess we get to go home early today then? And look into that whole
"Aye Pee Vee Sicks" thing next week aye boss?
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 8:58 AM Dmitry Sherman wrote:
> Just received a mail that RIPE is out of IPv4:
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> Today, at 15:35 UTC+1 on 25 November 2019, we
RIP RIPE
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Andy Ringsmuth
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2019 9:58 AM
To: NANOG mailing list
Subject: Re: RIPE our of IPv4
> On Nov 25, 2019, at 8:56 AM, Dmitry Sherman wrote:
>
> Just received a mail that RIPE is out of IPv4:
>
> Dear
> On Nov 25, 2019, at 8:56 AM, Dmitry Sherman wrote:
>
> Just received a mail that RIPE is out of IPv4:
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> Today, at 15:35 UTC+1 on 25 November 2019, we made our final /22 IPv4
> allocation from the last remaining addresses in our available pool. We have
> now run
I think it is less historic than when IANA ran out of blocks to
delegate to the regional registries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv4_address_exhaustion
Thanks,
Donald
===
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
Nice!
Is this what I think it is?a historical moment for the internet
for the story books?
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 at 15:59, Dmitry Sherman wrote:
>
> Just received a mail that RIPE is out of IPv4:
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> Today, at 15:35 UTC+1 on 25 November 2019, we made our final /22 IPv4
>
Just received a mail that RIPE is out of IPv4:
Dear colleagues,
Today, at 15:35 UTC+1 on 25 November 2019, we made our final /22 IPv4
allocation from the last remaining addresses in our available pool. We have now
run out of IPv4 addresses.
Best regards,
Dmitry Sherman
Interhost Networks
24 matches
Mail list logo
