Free.fr vs HE.net IPv6 (Was: CISA: Guidance on the Essential Critical Infrastructure Workforce)

2020-03-28 Thread Radu-Adrian Feurdean
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020, at 19:52, Mike Hammett wrote: > https://radar.qrator.net/as12322/providers#startDate=2019-12-27=2020-03-27=current Did you read the part about *IPv6* traffic ? Your link points to some IPv*4* relationship. Over IPv6, you get this :

Re: UDP/123 policers & status

2020-03-28 Thread Harlan Stenn
On 3/28/2020 5:35 PM, Ragnar Sundblad wrote: > > >> On 29 Mar 2020, at 01:18, Harlan Stenn wrote: >> >> Ragnar, >> >> On 3/28/2020 4:59 PM, Ragnar Sundblad wrote: >>> >>> On 29 Mar 2020, at 00:35, Harlan Stenn wrote: Ragnar, On 3/28/2020 4:09 PM, Ragnar Sundblad

Re: UDP/123 policers & status

2020-03-28 Thread Harlan Stenn
I think I see the disconnect. One of the design goals of NTS was to prevent NTS-protected time requests from being used in amplification attacks. Yes, that's true. I've been interpreting this thread as people claiming that NTS will solve a wider class of amplification vectors, and that's simply

Re: UDP/123 policers & status

2020-03-28 Thread Harlan Stenn
Ragnar, On 3/28/2020 4:59 PM, Ragnar Sundblad wrote: > > >> On 29 Mar 2020, at 00:35, Harlan Stenn wrote: >> >> Ragnar, >> >> On 3/28/2020 4:09 PM, Ragnar Sundblad wrote: >>> On 28 Mar 2020, at 23:58, Harlan Stenn wrote: > Steven Sommars said: >> The secure time transfer of

Re: UDP/123 policers & status

2020-03-28 Thread Harlan Stenn
Ragnar, On 3/28/2020 4:09 PM, Ragnar Sundblad wrote: > >> On 28 Mar 2020, at 23:58, Harlan Stenn wrote: >> >>> Steven Sommars said: The secure time transfer of NTS was designed to avoid >>>amplification attacks. >> >> Uh, no. > > Yes, it was. > > As Steven said, “The secure time

Re: UDP/123 policers & status

2020-03-28 Thread Harlan Stenn
On 3/28/2020 3:29 PM, Bottiger wrote: > but why isn't BCP 38 widely deployed?   > > > Because it costs time and money. People have been asking for it to be > implemented for decades. It is never going to be deployed on every network. So you are claiming BCP 38 has to be all or nothing?

Re: UDP/123 policers & status

2020-03-28 Thread Bottiger
> > but why isn't BCP 38 widely deployed? > Because it costs time and money. People have been asking for it to be implemented for decades. It is never going to be deployed on every network. What fraction of the > world does implement BCP 38? > Not enough. Everyone has to use it for it to work.

Re: Studies of Internet Paths "QoS"

2020-03-28 Thread Saku Ytti
Hey, > As a brief intro, I am in charge of Analytics/ML/AI as a Cisco Fellow. We > have been studying a number of paths characteristics through the Internet > both single and multi-SP, Best-effort/Business Internet backbone/MPLS, … > across all regions in the world and lately focussing on

Re: CISA: Guidance on the Essential Critical Infrastructure Workforce

2020-03-28 Thread Mike Hammett
https://radar.qrator.net/as12322/providers#startDate=2019-12-27=2020-03-27=current - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Lukas Tribus" To: "Radu-Adrian Feurdean" Cc: "Laura via NANOG

Studies of Internet Paths "QoS"

2020-03-28 Thread JP Vasseur (jvasseur) via NANOG
Hi Team, As a brief intro, I am in charge of Analytics/ML/AI as a Cisco Fellow. We have been studying a number of paths characteristics through the Internet both single and multi-SP, Best-effort/Business Internet backbone/MPLS, … across all regions in the world and lately focussing on SaaS,

FCC Ensures Americans Can Access Zoom and WebEx During COVID-19 Crisis

2020-03-28 Thread Sean Donelan
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-ensures-americans-can-access-zoom-and-webex-during-covid-19-crisis-0 The Federal Communications Commission today issued a temporary waiver of its access arbitrage rules to Inteliquent, a telecommunications company that carries traffic for two of the nation’s

Re: CISA: Guidance on the Essential Critical Infrastructure Workforce

2020-03-28 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hello, On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 at 11:13, Radu-Adrian Feurdean wrote: > > Are you talking about the same Free.fr that depeered HE a few days ago and > expects all IPv6(*) traffic from HE to arrive via their only transit - Cogent > ? Cogent is not their only transit; at the moment at least I see

Re: UDP/123 policers & status

2020-03-28 Thread Roland Dobbins
On 21 Mar 2020, at 4:58, Hal Murray wrote: I don't want to start a flame war, but why isn't BCP 38 widely deployed? Can somebody give me a pointer to a talk at NANOG or such? What fraction of the world does implement BCP 38? I'd also be interested in general background info on DDoS. Who

Re: CISA: Guidance on the Essential Critical Infrastructure Workforce

2020-03-28 Thread Baldur Norddahl
That would only be a problem for people that single home to HE? I love HE but like Cogent it is probably not smart to have them as a single provider for IPv6. On the other hand I am surprised that a french company can single home with Cogent. My experience is that Cogent has insufficient

Re: CISA: Guidance on the Essential Critical Infrastructure Workforce

2020-03-28 Thread Radu-Adrian Feurdean
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020, at 08:37, Bill Woodcock wrote: > And a giant thumbs up to Free, who are keeping my 10G broadband flying Are you talking about the same Free.fr that depeered HE a few days ago and expects all IPv6(*) traffic from HE to arrive via their only transit - Cogent ? (*) close to