On Sat, Mar 28, 2020, at 19:52, Mike Hammett wrote:
> https://radar.qrator.net/as12322/providers#startDate=2019-12-27=2020-03-27=current
Did you read the part about *IPv6* traffic ?
Your link points to some IPv*4* relationship. Over IPv6, you get this :
On 3/28/2020 5:35 PM, Ragnar Sundblad wrote:
>
>
>> On 29 Mar 2020, at 01:18, Harlan Stenn wrote:
>>
>> Ragnar,
>>
>> On 3/28/2020 4:59 PM, Ragnar Sundblad wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 29 Mar 2020, at 00:35, Harlan Stenn wrote:
Ragnar,
On 3/28/2020 4:09 PM, Ragnar Sundblad
I think I see the disconnect.
One of the design goals of NTS was to prevent NTS-protected time
requests from being used in amplification attacks. Yes, that's true.
I've been interpreting this thread as people claiming that NTS will
solve a wider class of amplification vectors, and that's simply
Ragnar,
On 3/28/2020 4:59 PM, Ragnar Sundblad wrote:
>
>
>> On 29 Mar 2020, at 00:35, Harlan Stenn wrote:
>>
>> Ragnar,
>>
>> On 3/28/2020 4:09 PM, Ragnar Sundblad wrote:
>>>
On 28 Mar 2020, at 23:58, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> Steven Sommars said:
>> The secure time transfer of
Ragnar,
On 3/28/2020 4:09 PM, Ragnar Sundblad wrote:
>
>> On 28 Mar 2020, at 23:58, Harlan Stenn wrote:
>>
>>> Steven Sommars said:
The secure time transfer of NTS was designed to avoid
>>>amplification attacks.
>>
>> Uh, no.
>
> Yes, it was.
>
> As Steven said, “The secure time
On 3/28/2020 3:29 PM, Bottiger wrote:
> but why isn't BCP 38 widely deployed?
>
>
> Because it costs time and money. People have been asking for it to be
> implemented for decades. It is never going to be deployed on every network.
So you are claiming BCP 38 has to be all or nothing?
>
> but why isn't BCP 38 widely deployed?
>
Because it costs time and money. People have been asking for it to be
implemented for decades. It is never going to be deployed on every network.
What fraction of the
> world does implement BCP 38?
>
Not enough. Everyone has to use it for it to work.
Hey,
> As a brief intro, I am in charge of Analytics/ML/AI as a Cisco Fellow. We
> have been studying a number of paths characteristics through the Internet
> both single and multi-SP, Best-effort/Business Internet backbone/MPLS, …
> across all regions in the world and lately focussing on
https://radar.qrator.net/as12322/providers#startDate=2019-12-27=2020-03-27=current
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Lukas Tribus"
To: "Radu-Adrian Feurdean"
Cc: "Laura via NANOG
Hi Team,
As a brief intro, I am in charge of Analytics/ML/AI as a Cisco Fellow. We have
been studying a number of paths characteristics through the Internet both
single and multi-SP, Best-effort/Business Internet backbone/MPLS, … across all
regions in the world and lately focussing on SaaS,
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-ensures-americans-can-access-zoom-and-webex-during-covid-19-crisis-0
The Federal Communications Commission today issued a temporary waiver of
its access arbitrage rules to Inteliquent, a telecommunications company
that carries traffic for two of the nation’s
Hello,
On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 at 11:13, Radu-Adrian Feurdean
wrote:
>
> Are you talking about the same Free.fr that depeered HE a few days ago and
> expects all IPv6(*) traffic from HE to arrive via their only transit - Cogent
> ?
Cogent is not their only transit; at the moment at least I see
On 21 Mar 2020, at 4:58, Hal Murray wrote:
I don't want to start a flame war, but why isn't BCP 38 widely
deployed? Can
somebody give me a pointer to a talk at NANOG or such? What fraction
of the
world does implement BCP 38?
I'd also be interested in general background info on DDoS. Who
That would only be a problem for people that single home to HE? I love HE
but like Cogent it is probably not smart to have them as a single provider
for IPv6.
On the other hand I am surprised that a french company can single home with
Cogent. My experience is that Cogent has insufficient
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020, at 08:37, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> And a giant thumbs up to Free, who are keeping my 10G broadband flying
Are you talking about the same Free.fr that depeered HE a few days ago and
expects all IPv6(*) traffic from HE to arrive via their only transit - Cogent ?
(*) close to
15 matches
Mail list logo
