dot-org TLD sale halted by ICANN

2020-04-30 Thread Andy Ringsmuth
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/05/01/icann_stops_dot_org_sale/ I know this has been bantered about on the list in the past. Great (IMHO) to see this happen. Andy Ringsmuth 5609 Harding Drive Lincoln, NE 68521-5831 (402) 304-0083 a...@andyring.com “Better even die free, than to live

Re: Google peering pains in Dallas

2020-04-30 Thread Niels Bakker
* ja...@puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch) [Thu 30 Apr 2020, 20:10 CEST]: (Waits for others to crawl out of the woodwork who were more involved in this :-) Half duplex 10baseT ports, man. The collision LEDs never calmed down. -- Niels.

Re: Google peering pains in Dallas

2020-04-30 Thread Matthew Petach
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 11:43 AM Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 2:39 PM Aaron C. de Bruyn > wrote: > > > > Why isn't there a well-known anycast ping address similar to > CloudFlare/Google/Level 3 DNS, or sorta like the NTP project? > > Get someone to carve out some

Re: Google peering pains in Dallas

2020-04-30 Thread Seth Mattinen
On 4/30/20 11:38 AM, Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG wrote: Why isn't there a well-known anycast ping address similar to CloudFlare/Google/Level 3 DNS, or sorta like the NTP project? Get someone to carve out some well-known IP and allow every ISP on the planet to add that IP to a router or BSD box

Re: Abuse Desks

2020-04-30 Thread Matt Erculiani
Is there really not already an RFC or BCP for a standard abuse reporting format? Even if what constitutes abuse is up for debate, a formatting standard would make processing and automation much easier. -Matt On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 9:18 AM Andrey Kostin wrote: > Maybe there is a market

Re: Abuse Desks

2020-04-30 Thread Gary E. Miller
Yo Mike! On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 07:10:19 -0500 (CDT) Mike Hammett wrote: > I don't think I've seen anything back from the biggest offender, > Digital Ocean, other than auto-responders acknowledging the report. I gave up on Digital Ocean. I blackhole all their nets. Eventually I had to white

Re: Google peering pains in Dallas

2020-04-30 Thread Jared Mauch
> On Apr 30, 2020, at 2:41 PM, Christopher Morrow > wrote: > > It sounds like, to me anyway, you'd like to copy/paste/sed the AS112 > project's goals, no? I just use this page: http://hasthelargehadroncolliderdestroyedtheworldyet.com/ - jared

Re: Google peering pains in Dallas

2020-04-30 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 2:39 PM Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote: > > Why isn't there a well-known anycast ping address similar to > CloudFlare/Google/Level 3 DNS, or sorta like the NTP project? > Get someone to carve out some well-known IP and allow every ISP on the planet > to add that IP to a router

Re: Google peering pains in Dallas

2020-04-30 Thread Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG
Why isn't there a well-known anycast ping address similar to CloudFlare/Google/Level 3 DNS, or sorta like the NTP project? Get someone to carve out some well-known IP and allow every ISP on the planet to add that IP to a router or BSD box somewhere on their network? Allow product manufacturers to

Re: Google peering pains in Dallas

2020-04-30 Thread Nick Hilliard
Jared Mauch wrote on 30/04/2020 19:09: This is why the majority of traffic volume for interconnection has generally been over private peering links (paid, SFI, otherwise). ixps have always been a mid-market phenomenon. They don't deal with the high volume data flows because it never made

Re: Google peering pains in Dallas

2020-04-30 Thread Jared Mauch
> On Apr 29, 2020, at 7:59 PM, Kaiser, Erich wrote: > > So it has been 3 weeks of major ICMP packet loss to any google service over > the Dallas Equinix IX, it is not affecting performance of service but is > affecting us with customer complaints and service calls due to some software >

Re: Google peering pains in Dallas

2020-04-30 Thread Saku Ytti
On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 20:11, William Allen Simpson wrote: > Tried to get the FTC interested, no joy. Congress made noises > about passing a law requiring software updates (especially for > security issues), but still nothing on that either. This is not practical or reasonable. Companies may

Re: Google peering pains in Dallas

2020-04-30 Thread William Allen Simpson
On 4/29/20 8:53 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: I suppose it's time for a more public: "Hey, when you want to test a service, please take the time to test that service on it's service port/protocol" Testing; "Is the internet up?" by pinging a DNS server, is ... not great ;( I get that telling

Re: Abuse Desks

2020-04-30 Thread Andrey Kostin
Maybe there is a market opportunity there? Develop reporting standard (or use one that was posted here), then develop reporting, processing and analytic tools, and then provide it as a service? Looks like a nice use case how to utilise clouds ;) Kind regards, Andrey Mike Hammett писал

Re: Abuse Desks

2020-04-30 Thread Mike Hammett
I did not want to target anyone in particular, so I have responded to my original e-mail. I have seen comments about the big guys just ignoring everything. I have had a non-zero number of e-mails from each of Azure, GCP, AWS, and Hetzner claiming that they have acted on my report. It isn't a

Re: Abuse Desks

2020-04-30 Thread Mike Hammett
There have been a lot of philosophical tangents to the original request. Are others seeing similar things? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From: "Mike Hammett" To: "North

Re: Abuse Desks

2020-04-30 Thread Mike Hammett
Centralized logging and run the analysis on the aggregate. You're more likely to catch them that way. No, it isn't guaranteed, but it's easier. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message -

Re: CGNAT Solutions

2020-04-30 Thread Masataka Ohta
Ca By wrote: The proper number to be considered should be percentage of IPv6 hosts which can not communicate with IPv4 only hosts. Isn't it 0%? I think you agree with me, here. For those of us running networks, especially growing networks, uniquely numbering hosts is our goal and ipv6 fits

Re: Abuse Desks

2020-04-30 Thread Hal Murray
Mike Hammett said: > IMO, the answer is balance. > - Handful of SSH connection attempts against a server. Nobody got in, > security hardening did it's job. I don't think that is worth reporting. - > Constant brute force SSH attempts from a given source over an extended period > of time, or a

Re: CGNAT Solutions

2020-04-30 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
And more and more CPE providers support it. See RFC8585. I inititally started using OpenWRT, but now I already got samples from several vendors. Regards, Jordi @jordipalet El 30/4/20 6:16, "NANOG en nombre de Ca By" escribió: On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 7:17 PM