< note that i am wearing arrcus hat >
> I'll be honest, none of our customers ever asked us to deploy RPKI and
> ROV. Will they benefit from it, sure? Is it about to become part of an
> RFP requirements document? Probably not.
we have rov in rfps received from paying customers
randy
Thank you for taking time out to recognize the great team in RSD Mehmet! The
fact is they go above and beyond each and every day and it's great to see that
pointed out. Lisa and her team are amazing. Thank you again.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 12, 2020, at 6:45 PM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
?
hey
Mehmet -
I shall pass along your praise to the team that does all the real work - and I
very glad we could help out!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
American Registry for Internet Numbers
On Jun 12, 2020, at 6:56 PM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
hey there,
I just wanted to share my experience
hey there,
I just wanted to share my experience dealing with ARIN support this week. I
think it's not very common to see people taking the time to write something
like this but I personally think we should do more often.
It has been long time since I had to deal with RIRs and this week I had to
On 12/Jun/20 17:19, David Sinn wrote:
> Yes. Path enumeration when you use mult-tier Clos topologies within a PoP
> causes you many, many problem.
Okay, got you. I thought you were running into these problems on the
"usual suspect" platforms.
Yes, commodity hardware certainly has a number
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to
On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 at 20:12, Andrey Kostin wrote:
> Sorry for jumping in in the mddle of discussion, as a side note, in case
> of IPIP tunneling, shouldn't another protocol type be utilized in MAC
> header? As I understand, in VXLAN VTEP ip is dedicated for this purpose,
> so receiving a packet
Saku Ytti писал 2020-06-12 12:10:
On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 at 18:52, David Sinn wrote:
Unless you want ECMP then it VERY much matters. But I guess since we
are only talking about theoretical instead of building an actual
practical network, it doesn't matter.
Well blatantly we are, because in
On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 at 18:52, David Sinn wrote:
> Unless you want ECMP then it VERY much matters. But I guess since we are only
> talking about theoretical instead of building an actual practical network, it
> doesn't matter.
Well blatantly we are, because in the real world most of the value
Salve,
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 8:08 PM David Sinn wrote:
Rewrites on MPLS is horrible from a memory perspective as maintaining the
> state and label transition to explore all possible discrete paths across
> the overall end-to-end path you are trying to take is hugely in-efficient.
> Applying
On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 at 18:42, David Sinn wrote:
> But why do you need full table lookup in the middle of the network? Why place
> that class of gear where it's not needed?
Some people do collapsed core. But this is getting bit theoretical,
because we definitely could do this on IP, we could do
+1
On 6/11/20 9:38 PM, b...@theworld.com wrote:
Addrex.net
I know some of the principles personally and would vouch for them.
On June 11, 2020 at 14:27 edwin.malle...@gmail.com (edwin.malle...@gmail.com)
wrote:
> Hi Nanog,
>
>
>
> I have need of a reputable IPv4 broker or service
On 11/Jun/20 19:19, Saku Ytti wrote:
> The demand is, we need tunneling, then the question is what are the
> metrics of a good tunneling solution. By answering this honestly, MPLS
> is better. We could do better surely, but IP is not that.
One unexpected benefit, I will say, with going native
On Fri, 12 Jun 2020 at 18:16, David Sinn wrote:
> I'm not sure what implementation you are saying doesn't exist. The Broadcom
> XGS line is all on-die. The two largest cloud providers are using them in
> their transport network (to the best of my understanding). So I'm not sure if
> your
Hi all,
>
> Loose mode RPF will essentially drop traffic received on the interface if the
> router does not have any route for. (will not match a default or a discard
> route, at least in IOS-XR)
>
> As Bill has pointed out, this may drop traffic from some peering networks that
> are not in the
I have good knowledge about best reputation of https://www.ipbroker.es/
Regards
Diego
On 11/06/20 14:40, "NANOG on behalf of b...@theworld.com"
wrote:
Addrex.net
I know some of the principles personally and would vouch for them.
On June 11, 2020 at 14:27
16 matches
Mail list logo
