Re: MAP-T in production

2020-07-27 Thread Baldur Norddahl
While I believe I in time will get at least 90% of residential users on IPv6, the track record for commercial customers is close to 0%. Also the number of websites and other Internet services with ipv6 is abysmal. We are somewhat saved by the American internet gigants which means that by traffic

Re: MAP-T in production

2020-07-27 Thread Brian Johnson
NAT444 CGN does NOT solve an IPv6 problem at all. It solves an IPv4 shortage problem at best and is not designed as a long-term solution. I cannot force customers to buy new equipment to make them IPv6 compliant. The best option is to support, fully and unabashedly, IPv6 and help with the

NANOG 80 will be a virtual meeting 

2020-07-27 Thread NANOG News
*NANOG 80 will be held as a virtual meeting to ensure the safety and wellbeing of our community — the in-person meeting in Seattle has been canceled. * In light of continued COVID-19 outbreaks throughout North America, the NANOG Board of Directors and Staff have decided to hold NANOG 80

[NANOG-announce] NANOG 80 will be a virtual meeting 

2020-07-27 Thread NANOG News
*NANOG 80 will be held as a virtual meeting to ensure the safety and wellbeing of our community — the in-person meeting in Seattle has been canceled. * In light of continued COVID-19 outbreaks throughout North America, the NANOG Board of Directors and Staff have decided to hold NANOG 80

Re: Internet Providers in 111 8th Ave, NYC

2020-07-27 Thread Tom Beecher
> > f you want to post to this list asking for help, > then refusing the help you get because you don't > have the energy or inclination to use one of the suggestions, then move on. > I disagree with this position. A possible solution was offered , and some legitimate concerns were raised about

Re: cloud backup

2020-07-27 Thread Randy Bush
> Just out of curiosity, do you folks encrypt the data prior to upload > to the cloud uh, ja

Re: cloud backup

2020-07-27 Thread Mark Tinka
On 27/Jul/20 13:49, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote: > Just out of curiosity, do you folks encrypt the data prior to upload to the > cloud (especially when uploading to folks like aws/google/ms/(facebook))? > Was wondering if these folks provide encryption of stored data - quick > google

RE: cloud backup

2020-07-27 Thread adamv0025
> Randy Bush > Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2020 9:10 PM > > i backup using arq on macos catalina. on two macs, i need maybe 3-4tb max. > google seems to be $100/mo for 20tb (big jump from $100/yr for 2tb). > backblaze b2 looks more like $20/mo for 4tb ($0.005/gb/mo). > anyone else done a similar

Re: cloud backup

2020-07-27 Thread Mark Tinka
On 27/Jul/20 03:06, Eric Tykwinski wrote: > I’m in the same boat, and sadly I still run VoIP for my house because > why not… Same here. We cut the PSTN line 3 years ago, and moved to VoIP. We hardly use it, since we have cellphones, but indeed, why not? Mark.

Re: cloud backup

2020-07-27 Thread Mark Tinka
On 26/Jul/20 23:44, John Sage wrote: > > That awkward moment when someone apparently thinks that the author of: > > A Basic FidoNet(r) Technical Standard > Revision 16 > by > Randy Bush, Pacific Systems Group > September 30, 1995 > > is... > > ...what was the word? > > A "newbie"? > > hmm...