On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:02:01 -0800, Jay Hennigan said:
> In the old days on the NANAE newsgroup, such bogus threats of legal
> action were categorized as one calling their "cartooney". People who
> huff and puff and threaten to sue rarely do so. If someone actually
> plans on suing you, your
still trying to post . . .
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: Phoenix-IX Contact
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:15:34 -0700
From: Paul Emmons
To: nanog@nanog.org
Hello All!
I've been out of the loop here and but have some updates.
There was a change last spring and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Is there anyone at Spectrum business with clue who can contact me off list
regarding some peering issues in your network? I have several customers
seeing 150ms of latency due to traffic bouncing between east and west coasts
to go across the room.
On 11/16/20 19:04, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 09:22:33 +, Elad Cohen said:
Did I start legal proceedings with AfriNIC with conspiracy theories or with
facts and data?
OK.. I'll probably end up regretting this, but...
Is there any actual independently verifiable proof
The leaking past the VPN thing is pretty obnoxious. There are people who may
be subject to policy and/or regulatory requirements that don’t permit split
tunnels (even if supposedly not in userspace), so it will be interesting to see
what burdens the use of an OS that intentionally leaks data
On 11/17/20 08:54, Saku Ytti wrote:
I put most of the blame on the market, we've modelled commercial
router market so that poor quality NOS is good for business and good
quality NOS is bad for business, I don't think this is in anyone's
formal business plan or that companies even realise
Hello All!
I've been out of the loop here and but have some updates.
There was a change last spring and I moved on to other projects. But
that hasn't worked out for the IX.
I have regained access to all of the elements, including the email and
voip. Let me reach out to each of you offline
On 17.11.2020 around 02:36 Sabri Berisha wrote:
Interesting. A long time ago, in a galaxy far far away, where I was a
JTAC engineer, policy was that once a PR was hit in the field, it
would be marked public.
Also, in the case that I described it wasn't a Junos device. Makes me
wonder how bugs
On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 09:35, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Yes, saw that too, and that post by Apple is also highlighted (and explained)
> in the same report.
Aah, I had not seen the updated version of it, thanks.
--
++ytti
9 matches
Mail list logo
