On 22/04/2021 02:24, Job Snijders via NANOG wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 09:22:57PM +, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) wrote:
I'd like to get some data on what actually happened in the real cases
and analyze it.
[snip]
TCP zero window is possible, but many other things could
cause it too.
I'm not sure if this is helpful to this discussion or not, but I recently
became aware of a bug in a virtual router using DPDK+VPP which sounds like it
could possibly produce a similar issue to what is being described, without the
TCP window being a factor.
The system used the same process to
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 09:22:57PM +, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) wrote:
> I'd like to get some data on what actually happened in the real cases
> and analyze it.
>
> [snip]
>
> TCP zero window is possible, but many other things could
> cause it too.
Indeed. There could be a number of reasons that
Dnia Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:59:06PM +, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG
napisał(a):
> Has anyone else seen this before or can provide data to analyze?
> On or off list.
- https://labs.ripe.net/author/romain_fontugne/bgp-zombies/
- https://www.slideshare.net/atendesoftware/bgp-zombie-routes
You can send over your self-published Geofeed URL (or just direct geo data)
to IPInfo at
https://ipinfo.io/contact - they’re very quick to respond and take action;
I assume the process is similar for IPData.
Best
Phin
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:34 PM Brian wrote:
> Good day all. I am trying to
Good day all. I am trying to find contacts at ipdata.co and ipinfo.io. I
recently acquired new ip space and most places have updated. But the above
2 have not and still show CA as the location for this ip space. Please feel
free to email me off the list.
Thank you
Brian
I'd like to get some data on what actually happened
in the real cases and analyze it.
If it's a Cisco router at fault, then we have a bug to fix.
Even if it's not a Cisco, there may be ways we can help
to avoid the situation.
However, before we start on solutions, I'd like to get
a good
Dear Jakob, group,
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:59:06PM +, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) via NANOG wrote:
> Ben's blog details an experiment in which he advertises routes and then
> withdraws them, but some of them remain stuck for days.
>
> I'd like to get to the bottom of this problem.
I think there
Ben's blog details an experiment in which he advertises routes and then
withdraws them, but some of them remain stuck for days.
I'd like to get to the bottom of this problem.
Has anyone else seen this before or can provide data to analyze?
On or off list.
Regards,
Jakob.
-Original
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:58 AM nanoguser100 via NANOG wrote:
> I wanted to get the communities' opinion on this.
>
> Increasingly I have run into 'niche needs' where a client has a few users in
> a country we don't have a POP, say Estonia. This is 'mainly' for
> localization but also in some
I wanted to get the communities' opinion on this.
I am an admin for a quasi-ISP providing cloud hosted desktop solutions for end
users. We have POPs all around the world, own our own ASN, and advertise /24s
or /23s at each of our POPs fro our large aggregate. As an ISP we submit our
blocks to
Nice article explaining a specific BGP corner case not removing routes when
TCP window reaches 0.
https://blog.benjojo.co.uk/post/bgp-stuck-routes-tcp-zero-window
The proposed solution is a new RFC for BGP with the suggestion to introduce
a new timer.
Fascinating!
Jean St-Laurent /CISSP
12 matches
Mail list logo
