Re: Juniper hardware recommendation

On 5/10/21 20:22, aar...@gvtc.com wrote: Thanks Mark.  We have a ring of MX960’s currently and wanted to spare the parts with each other, between the 960’s and 240’s…. scb’s, re’s, mpc’s… Ah, makes sense in that case, then. Mark.

Re: RADb

- Original Message - > From: "Stephane Bortzmeyer" > To: "Marco Paesani" > Cc: "nanog" > Sent: Monday, May 10, 2021 3:45:11 AM > On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 09:25:36AM +0200, > Marco Paesani wrote > a message of 51 lines which said: > >> do you have news about the issue on RADb ? > >

juniper qfx5120-ym - curvature - infinera optic issues

NANOG Fam This is a rather interesting issue to see if anyone has ran across this with a Curvature branded 10 or 100G LR optic in a Juniper QFX facing an Infinera wave. What we’ve noticed is migrating from MX 204 to a new QFX 5120-YM that has an Infinera as the handoff, the circuit just

RE: Juniper hardware recommendation

Thanks Mark. We have a ring of MX960’s currently and wanted to spare the parts with each other, between the 960’s and 240’s…. scb’s, re’s, mpc’s… -Aaron

[NANOG-announce] Register Now for NANOG 82

“Father of the Internet” Vinton Cerf joins Keynote Virtual StageWe are honored to welcome one of the widely known “fathers of the Internet,” Vinton G. Cerf to the NANOG 82 virtual stage as a Keynote speaker! The legendary and multi

Register Now for NANOG 82

“Father of the Internet” Vinton Cerf joins Keynote Virtual StageWe are honored to welcome one of the widely known “fathers of the Internet,” Vinton G. Cerf to the NANOG 82 virtual stage as a Keynote speaker! The legendary and multi

Register Now for NANOG 82 Virtual

“Father of the Internet” Vinton Cerf joins Keynote Virtual Stage We are honored to welcome one of the widely known “fathers of the Internet,” Vinton G. Cerf to the NANOG 82 virtual stage as a Keynote speaker! The legendary and multi award-winning Cerf will present: The Evolution of the

Re: Juniper hardware recommendation

man. 10. maj 2021 16.20 skrev : > I prefer MX204 over the ACX5048. The ACX5048 can’t add L3 interface to an > mpls layer 2 type of service. There are other limitations to the ACX5048 > that cause me to want to possibly replace them with MX204’s. But in > defense of the ACX5048, we have gotten

Re: Juniper hardware recommendation

On 5/10/21 16:19, aar...@gvtc.com wrote: I prefer MX204 over the ACX5048.  The ACX5048 can’t add L3 interface to an mpls layer 2 type of service.  There are other limitations to the ACX5048 that cause me to want to possibly replace them with MX204’s.  But in defense of the ACX5048, we have

RE: Juniper hardware recommendation

I prefer MX204 over the ACX5048. The ACX5048 can’t add L3 interface to an mpls layer 2 type of service. There are other limitations to the ACX5048 that cause me to want to possibly replace them with MX204’s. But in defense of the ACX5048, we have gotten some good mileage (a few years now) of

T-Mobile RF Engineer Contact

Hello, Could someone in the T-Mobile RF Engineering Department with information on the Williamsport, PA MSA contact me offlist?

Re: DNSSEC Best Practices

On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 22:56 +0200, Arne Jensen wrote: > NB: The reason I'm writing 14 4, a.k.a. ECDSAP384SHA384 all along is that > I've seen DNSSEC signatures with 14 2 (ECDSAP384SHA256), which I would find > quite weird. This appears to be a frequent source of confusion. In '14 4', '14' is

Spoofer Report for NANOG for Apr 2021

In response to feedback from operational security communities, CAIDA's source address validation measurement project (https://spoofer.caida.org) is automatically generating monthly reports of ASes originating prefixes in BGP for systems from which we received packets with a spoofed source address.

Re: RADb

On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 09:25:36AM +0200, Marco Paesani wrote a message of 51 lines which said: > do you have news about the issue on RADb ? Note that it is discussed on the outages mailing list. No specific news, just that it is down.

RADb

Hi Guys, do you have news about the issue on RADb ? Please let me know, thank you. Kind regards, - Marco Paesani Skype: mpaesani Mobile: +39 348 6019349 Success depends on the right choice ! Email: ma...@paesani.it