Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT)

> On Apr 6, 2022, at 04:48 , John Curran wrote: > > On 5 Apr 2022, at 11:57 PM, William Herrin > wrote: >> >> On 5 Apr 2022, at 8:38 PM, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) > > wrote: >>> But say they sign an LRSA: Those $0 fees would go up to 150, this

Re: [nanog] 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40

> On Apr 5, 2022, at 15:04 , John Curran wrote: > > >> On 5 Apr 2022, at 5:31 PM, Owen DeLong > > wrote: >>> On Apr 4, 2022, at 17:40 , John Curran >> > wrote: >>> ... >> >>> Interesting – as ARIN’s fee schedule was designed specifically so

Puerto Rico (island-wide) power outage

The island-wide electrical grid has failed on Puerto Rico. From the utility company: Fault in the output breaker of Unit #5 of Costa Sur at 230kv caused the output of units 5 and 6 of the Central. The electrical system protection system took the rest of the units that were generating out

Re: IP Multicast Persistent Duplicate Packet Issue

Thanks Jared. Yes it is SSM. I will try to flip PIM priority and align HSRP active. My initial thought was keeping everything as it is. Can I simply flip PIM assert winner to PE1. Same way we can manually select STP root. Looks like this is probably not an option. Didn't find relevant doc on how

Re: IP Multicast Persistent Duplicate Packet Issue

You can likely set "ip pim dr-priority" to get what you want https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipmulti/command/imc-cr-book/imc_i3.html#wp1384657000 - Jared On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 09:07:34AM +1000, Roman Islam wrote: > Thanks Jared. Yes it is SSM. I will try to

Re: V6 still not supported

There is also Customer contacts ACCC in Australia and complains that Sony is not supplying a working product and Sony gets fined and instructed to change their rules about customers behind CGNATs. > On 7 Apr 2022, at 03:24, Jared Brown wrote: > > Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: >>> I would

Re: Enhance CG-NAT Re: V6 still not supported

Hi, Bill: 0)    Thanks for bringing up the NANOG posting guideline. We now have something tangible to discuss. 1)    Section 6. looks most relevant. So, I copy and paste it below for our discussion:     A.    6.1.1. "... > relevant excerpt 1   response to excerpt 1 ...    ":    This seems

Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT)

On 6 Apr 2022, at 1:32 PM, William Herrin wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 4:48 AM John Curran wrote: >> On 5 Apr 2022, at 11:57 PM, William Herrin wrote: >>> My objection lies in having ARIN's RSA adhere to my address block >>> overall. I may feel differently about ARIN next year than I do

Looking for an Amazon Cloudfront contact

It looks like I may have a range of recently put into use residential symmetric gigabit last mile IP space that's being filtered/blocked at the application level. Please contact me off-list.

Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT)

On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 4:48 AM John Curran wrote: > On 5 Apr 2022, at 11:57 PM, William Herrin wrote: >> My objection lies in having ARIN's RSA adhere to my address block >> overall. I may feel differently about ARIN next year than I do this >> year but once I've signed that RSA, well, that's

Re: V6 still not supported

Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: >> I would expect the trend to become that ISP's refuse to accommodate 3rd >> party vendors shenanigans to the point where it hampers their operations or >> to the point where it cost them more to do so. > > $ISP_1 refuses to accommodate Sony’s shenanigans… >

Re: IP Multicast Persistent Duplicate Packet Issue

If this is ASM, what device is the RP? You may want to configure MSDP between PE1/PE2 to help if that’s the case, or is this SSM or something else you may want to just flip the PIM priority to make it pick what you want and see if you can tie it to your HSRP (Cisco, might I suggest VRRP so you

Now open - 2022 ARIN Community Grants for Internet infrastructure development/research projects

NANOGers - The ARIN Community Grant program has opened its 2022 "call for applications”. If you are aware of a non-commercial development or research project that could enhance Internet operations and might benefit from additional funding, please bring this opportunity to their attention.

Re: Enhance CG-NAT Re: V6 still not supported

Hi, Ant: 1)    As I Cc:'ed you, I attempted to contact the author of the IPv4+ draft a few days ago to offer my reading of his work. I have not heard any response. In short, I believe that IPv4+ is paraphrasing the scheme of the unsuccessful RFC1385 that EzIP Draft cited as Informative

Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022)

Lumen / Level3 filtergen is trimming these routes now. Don't bother trying to query filtergen.level3.net currently; server is full. Small AS cone does not equal small societal footprint & impact. While I appreciate the intention upthread of proxy registering at ATLDB, it really just distracted

IP Multicast Persistent Duplicate Packet Issue

Hi Everyone, Has anyone experienced a TETRA Radio application issue if underlying IP multicast transport sends persistent duplicate packets? Here is my scenario as below: PIM is running on the MPLS L3 VPN environment. C multicast is running on a single VRF (TETRA) only. Source is running behind

Re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT - Approximately 40 hours until potentially significant routing changes (re: Retirement of ARIN Non-Authenticated IRR scheduled for 4 April 2022)

On 4/4/2022 7:08 PM, Tom Beecher wrote: I am an ARIN admin and tech POC for one of the affected ASNs/sets of prefixes across 2 OrgIDs. I looked back at the messages I've received that mention NONAUTH or Non-Authenticated. The only thing I've gotten is the message originally

FuboTV Geolocation

Is anyone on the list from FuboTV that can assist or point me in the right direction for a geolocation issue? Thank you, Nich Warren AS395658

Re: ARIN fee structure (was: re: 2749 routes AT RISK - Re: TIMELY/IMPORTANT)

On 5 Apr 2022, at 11:57 PM, William Herrin mailto:b...@herrin.us>> wrote: On 5 Apr 2022, at 8:38 PM, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) mailto:d...@prime.gushi.org>> wrote: But say they sign an LRSA: Those $0 fees would go up to 150, this year, 175 next year, 200 the following...250 in year five... to be