On 5/16/22 20:27, Randy Carpenter wrote:
Yes... the MX304 is awesome, but the price is going to be crazy. Possibly ~10x
MX204 if fully loaded.
For me, the MX304 should, really, be an alternative to the MX10003, and
not an upgrade of the MX204.
Far easier to get more MX204's than even
On Mon, 16 May 2022 18:34:29 +
Matthew Crocker wrote:
> I’m looking for a free-ish Linux open sources Netflow
> collector/analyser.
[...]
There was a long thread back in January that I think will provide
you many of the suggestions you're seeking. If you haven't seen it, it
starts here:
Try FlowViewer (analyzing, graphing, tending software) + SiLK (robust,
high-performance capture software from Carnegie-Mellon).
Pretty full netflow analysis package; free.
See: http://flowviewer.net
Joe
On 5/16/2022 2:34 PM, Matthew Crocker wrote:
I’m looking for a free-ish Linux open
I’m looking for a free-ish Linux open sources Netflow collector/analyser. I
have 5 Juniper MX routers that will send IPFIX flows to for an ISP network.
I’m hoping it is something I can run in AWS/EC2 as I don’t want to worry about
storage again in my lifetime. Does anyone have any
- On May 16, 2022, at 2:06 PM, Aled Morris aled.w.mor...@googlemail.com
wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2022 at 18:52, Randy Carpenter < [ mailto:rcar...@network1.net
> |
> rcar...@network1.net ] > wrote:
>> My hope for a successor (MX205 ?) would be more flexibility and 25G ports.
>>
On 5/16/22 20:06, Aled Morris via NANOG wrote:
I was hoping the MX304 would be the upgrade, but it seems like
overkill - 2U, modular with dual processors, up to 96 x 10/25 GbE, 48
x 40/50/100, 12 x 400 GbE
Probably a bit more expensive than MX204 too.
There's also ACX7100-48L: 48x
On Mon, 16 May 2022 at 18:52, Randy Carpenter wrote:
> My hope for a successor (MX205 ?) would be more flexibility and 25G ports.
> 4x100G+8x25G would be awesome.
>
>
I was hoping the MX304 would be the upgrade, but it seems like overkill -
2U, modular with dual processors, up to 96 x 10/25 GbE,
If additional ports are more important than the full 100G throughput, you can
configure it as 2x100+2x40+8x10.
We tend to break out 10G ports on switches, so we can more fully utilize the
100G ports.
My hope for a successor (MX205 ?) would be more flexibility and 25G ports.
4x100G+8x25G
Adam,
Simply put - No there isn't a way to oversubscribe the front panel.
Juniper has a handy tool to check your port combinations though -
https://apps.juniper.net/home/port-checker/index.html
The lack of being able to oversubscribe has to do with # of lanes to the EA
ASIC, and how those can
Hi all,
Hoping some Juniper-using folks know:
On the MX204, which comes with 4x100G + 8x10G ports, you can only use 3 of the
4 100G ports if you want to use any of the 10G ports at all.
Supposedly this is to prevent oversubscription on what is a 400G-rated router.
However, I’m perfectly fine
10 matches
Mail list logo
