Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211201009.AYC

2022-11-20 Thread Mark Tinka
On 11/20/22 19:02, Abraham Y. Chen wrote: Dear Mark: 0)  I am surprised at your apparently sarcastic opinion. 1)  The EzIP proposal as referenced by my last MSG is the result of an in-depth system engineering effort. Since the resultant schemes do not rely on any protocol development,

Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above

2022-11-20 Thread Eric Kuhnke
If I had a dollar for every person who has lived their entire life in a high-income western country (US, Canada, western Europe, etc) and has zero personal experience in developing-nation telecom/ISP operations and their unique operational requirements, yet thinks they've qualified to offer an

Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211201503.AYC

2022-11-20 Thread Abraham Y. Chen
Dear Rubens: 0) Very good question. It is right to the point! 1) Initially, we thought that we were doing conventional protocol development engineering that was triggered by our curiosity about why IPv4 address pool was depleted. So, IETF Draft was the natural place to report what we were

Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above

2022-11-20 Thread Matthew Petach
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 7:53 PM Abraham Y. Chen wrote: > Dear Owen: > > 1) "... Africa ... They don’t really have a lot of alternatives. ...": > Actually, there is, simple and in plain sight. Please have a look at the > below IETF Draft: > > >

Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211201009.AYC

2022-11-20 Thread Rubens Kuhl
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 2:03 PM Abraham Y. Chen wrote: > > Dear Mark: > > 0) I am surprised at your apparently sarcastic opinion. > > 1) The EzIP proposal as referenced by my last MSG is the result of an > in-depth system engineering effort. Since the resultant schemes do not > rely on any

Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211201009.AYC

2022-11-20 Thread Abraham Y. Chen
Dear Mark: 0)  I am surprised at your apparently sarcastic opinion. 1)  The EzIP proposal as referenced by my last MSG is the result of an in-depth system engineering effort. Since the resultant schemes do not rely on any protocol development, IETF does not need be involved. Especially, its

Re: afrinic rpki issue

2022-11-20 Thread Cedrick Adrien Mbeyet
Hi Job, Thank you for this good analysis and for sharing your findings. The issue has since been fixed and the team will publish a post-mortem accordingly once we are done with making sure the issue will not reappear. Your recommendation is well noted and I cc my colleague so that they can take

Re: afrinic rpki issue

2022-11-20 Thread Job Snijders via NANOG
Hi all, It appears PacketVis correctly identified an issue. AFRINIC's self-signed root AfriNIC.cer [1] points via its SIA to 'afrinic-ca.cer' [2] which in turn references a RPKI Manifest named 'K1eJenypZMPIt_e92qek2jSpj4A.mft'. The K1eJenypZMPIt_e92qek2jSpj4A Manifest lists 499 Certificate

Re: afrinic rpki issue

2022-11-20 Thread Cedrick Adrien Mbeyet
Hi Randy, Thank you for sharing this information. Our team is investigating the alert. Best regards, == Cedrick Adrien MBEYET Ebene Cybercity, Mauritius +230 5851 7674 +++ Never give up, Keep moving forward +++ On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 8:37 AM Randy Bush wrote: >