Re: ingress/egress 9/8 gov.xxx.ticket; was: Re: pls pls me 80/81...

2022-11-24 Thread J. Hellenthal via NANOG
Nothing like a good ole April fools please fill my empty repo with your code. Happy 旅 genocide day everyone.--  J. HellenthalThe fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume.On Nov 24, 2022, at 14:12, Matthew Petach wrote:Whoa!Is

Re: ingress/egress 9/8 gov.xxx.ticket; was: Re: pls pls me 80/81...

2022-11-24 Thread Matthew Petach
Whoa! Is it the start of April already? I must have overslept last night, I could have sworn we just barely made it to Thanksgiving! Matt On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 6:48 AM AQ Glass wrote: > anybody interested in this project? > > @oracle can own the .ticket tld; NS * ticket. -> virtualhost > >

Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC

2022-11-24 Thread Chris Welti
Hi Abe, the problem is that the AMS-IX data only covers the public fabric, but the peering connections between the big CDNs/clouds and the large ISPs all happen on private dedicated circuits as it is so much traffic that it does not make sense to run it over a public IX fabric (in addition to

Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC

2022-11-24 Thread Abraham Y. Chen
Hi, Eduard: 0) Thanks for sharing your research efforts. 1) Similar as your own experience, we also recognized the granularity issue of the data in this particular type of statistics. Any data that is based on a limited number of countries, regions, businesses, industry segments, etc. will

Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC

2022-11-24 Thread Douglas Fischer
Hello Abraham! I believe your e-mail client (MUA) is splitting every message on a new thread. I'm not sure if it is happening with everyone, but using Gmail as MUA, it isn't aggregating the mails on the same thread. Cloud you please check the confs of your tool to avoid it? Thanks in advance.

RE: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC

2022-11-24 Thread Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG
Hi Abraham, Let me clarify a little bit on statistics - I did an investigation last year. Google and APNIC report very similar numbers. APNIC permits drilling down deep details. Then it is possible to understand that they see only 100M Chinese. China itself reports 0.5B IPv6 users. APNIC gives

Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211240353.AYC

2022-11-24 Thread Abraham Y. Chen
Dear Mathew: 0) Appreciate very much for your professionalism. Technical discussions over cyberspace like this are very challenging because the lack of instant feedback. One person could write a long essay without knowing that it is already off the track. Compounded with not knowing the other

Re: Alternative Re: ipv4/25s and above Re: 202211232221.AYC

2022-11-24 Thread Abraham Y. Chen
Dear Joe: 0) Allow me to share my understanding of the two topics that you brought up. 1) "... https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html, it looks like we’ve gone from ~0% to ~40% in 12 years ":  Your numbers may be deceiving.   A. The IPv6 was introduced in 1995-12, launched