The comment looks outdated: Who cares now about ATM?
But all wireless (including WiFi) emulate broadcast in a very unsatisfactory
way.
Hence, the requirement is still very accurate.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+vasilenko.eduard=huawei@nanog.org] On
Behalf Of
Hello Masataka-san
For that issue at least there was some effort.
Though ATM and FR appear to be long gone, the problem got even worse with
pseudo wires / overlays and wireless.
It was tackled in the IoT community 10+ years ago and we ended up with RFC 8505
and 8928. This is implemented in
Randy Bush wrote:
three of the promises of ipng which ipv6 did not deliver
o compatibility/transition,
o security, and
o routing & renumbering
You miss a promise of
o ND over ATM/NBMA
which caused IPv6 lack a notion of link broadcast.
On January 12, 2023 at 02:11 n...@neo.co.tz (Noah) wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> So, It was assumed that IPv4 depletion would effectively lead to the adoption
> of IPv6. This has not been the case in the last decade save for a very few
> countries in the world.
>
> It was also assumed that IPv6
Randy -
Full agreement - nicely said.
/John
P.s disclaimer: my views alone - do not eat packet.
> On Jan 11, 2023, at 7:10 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>
>>
>> It was assumed that IPng would include a standard straightforward
>> technological solution to support communication with IPv4 hosts –
> It was assumed that IPng would include a standard straightforward
> technological solution to support communication with IPv4 hosts – this
> was a defined hard requirement.
>
> This transition mechanism wasn’t available at the time of the
> selection of IPng, and instead was left as a future
Noah -
It was assumed that IPng would include a standard straightforward technological
solution to support communication with IPv4 hosts – this was a defined hard
requirement.
This transition mechanism wasn’t available at the time of the selection of
IPng, and instead was left as a future
Hi John,
So, It was assumed that IPv4 depletion would effectively lead to the
adoption of IPv6. This has not been the case in the last decade save for a
very few countries in the world.
It was also assumed that IPv6 only networks would crop all over the place
as a result, providing the same
*Experience Atlanta at NANOG 87! *
*Special Offers, Things To Do, Transportation, Dining, + More *
NANOG 87 will take place in Atlanta, GA 13 - 15 February.
*The City of Atlanta* will provide discounts for dining and activities for
our NANOG community. Discover Atlanta, check out the best ways
*Experience Atlanta at NANOG 87! *
*Special Offers, Things To Do, Transportation, Dining, + More *
NANOG 87 will take place in Atlanta, GA 13 - 15 February.
*The City of Atlanta* will provide discounts for dining and activities for
our NANOG community. Discover Atlanta, check out the best ways
Aaron,
> Would someone from AS3491 please contact me off-list?
if you find one, plesae share...
Thx,
Elmar.
Hi,
Would someone from AS3491 please contact me off-list?
Been trying to fix a prefix acceptance issue for weeks and am getting nowhere.
Thanks,
Aaron
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 01:04:28PM -0600, Mike Hammett wrote:
> I don't even know where this conversation has gone anymore.
You have reached a terminal point in the NANOG mailing list state
machine: NOP-ARGUE
Many paths lead to this state, and it isn't unique to NANOG.
The sub-state is:
Here's their new stuff:
https://bgp.he.net/AS14593
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Dugas via NANOG"
To: "Tom Beecher"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2023
I don't even know where this conversation has gone anymore.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Masataka Ohta"
To: "Mike Hammett"
Cc: "nanog list" , "Matthew Walster"
Sent: Wednesday,
Starlink has nothing to do with Google Fiber. It used to use Google Cloud
for routing (BYOIP) in the early days but I am sure this has changed.
Eric
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 9:51 AM Tom Beecher wrote:
> I can say with certainty at least one downlink location is not using
> Google Fiber, as I am
I can say with certainty at least one downlink location is not using Google
Fiber, as I am sitting about 1/2 mile from it , and have firsthand
knowledge of all glass in the ground around here.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:14 AM Dave Taht wrote:
> I maintain an email list for issues specific to
Mike Hammett wrote:
" With plain IP routers?"
Yes, or, well, relatively plain, depending on the implementation.
As completely plain routers have no difficulty to treat a
default route, it is a waste of money and effort to try to
have not so plain routers to do so regardless of whether the
18 matches
Mail list logo
