On 5/4/23 00:51, Matt Corallo wrote:
Lots of replies saying which of BIRD/exabgp/frr/quagga/openbgpd folks
prefer, but they're all pretty good. Honestly for such a project
they're all just as great, it comes down mostly to what you're used to
config-wise. Used to big metal router
No argument there at all. Just felt like there was enough FUD in that link
it was worth calling out that specific.
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 2:39 PM Glenn Kelley
wrote:
> Tom - you are correct
>
> Of course - who keeps things like BGP Route Servers and FRR up to date -
>
> cough cough
>
>
> Glenn
Lots of replies saying which of BIRD/exabgp/frr/quagga/openbgpd folks prefer, but they're all pretty
good. Honestly for such a project they're all just as great, it comes down mostly to what you're
used to config-wise. Used to big metal router configuration? You might find BIRD foreign. Used to
I just checked the Cisco IOS-XR code. It's not vulnerable to any of the 3 flaws
listed in the below linked hackernews article.
Kind Regards,
Jakob
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 12:52:46 +0300
From: Hank Nussbacher
On 02/05/2023 17:56, Warren Kumari wrote:
For those that like FRR:
Tom - you are correct
Of course - who keeps things like BGP Route Servers and FRR up to date -
cough cough
Glenn S. Kelley,
I am a Connectivity.Engineer
Text and Voice Direct: 740-206-9624
a Division of CreatingNet.Works
IMPORTANT: The contents of this email and any attachments are
Does anyone here use VXLAN on Cisco Nexus gear in the "vlan-aware-bundle" mode
(RFC7432 §6.3), not the "vlan-based" mode (§6.1)? If so, could you please
contact me directly to explain how you did so?
Much appreciated,
-Adam
Adam Thompson
Consultant, Infrastructure Services
>
> For those that like FRR:
> https://thehackernews.com/2023/05/researchers-uncover-new-bgp-flaws-in.html
All 3 of those CVEs look like they were fixed and backported into 8.2
through 8.4 at least 6 months ago.
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 5:54 AM Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> On 02/05/2023 17:56,
>
> My issue was just trying to convince Spectrum to look into the problem in
> the first place, I brought the Atlas probe receipts because it’s such a
> helpful tool, but wasn’t able to get through to anyone helpful (acct mgr,
> noc email, even the escalation list) until I started lighting fires
On 02/05/2023 17:56, Warren Kumari wrote:
For those that like FRR:
https://thehackernews.com/2023/05/researchers-uncover-new-bgp-flaws-in.html
Regards,
Hank
+lots.
I've used a number of Linux routing thingies (BIRD, Quagga,
VyOS/Ubiquiti, OpenBGPd, ExBGP), and FRR is (for me at least) by
On 5/3/23 11:10, Vasilenko Eduard wrote:
You are right. My message was pretty much geared toward incumbents.
But the majority of the access/aggregation is in their possessions,
isn’t it?
Generally, I'd say yes.
But to the OP's survey, the incumbents also have the majority
> Yeah, you sound like an equipment vendor whose main customers are incumbent
> telco's in a few rich markets :-).
You are right. My message was pretty much geared toward incumbents.
But the majority of the access/aggregation is in their possessions, isn’t it?
They typically have ducts that were
On 5/3/23 08:20, Vasilenko Eduard wrote:
I would risk to say a little more on this.
Indeed, maybe the situation (in many countries) when the Carrier sells
a lot of TDM services.
But in general, packet services are enough these days for many
carriers/regions.
There aren't enough TDM
Coming back to this thread a little - what are folk seeing where 3rd
party networks are involved?
Are you able to convince providers to run FR optics, where LR4 are still
commonplace?
Mark.
> At that scale, DWDM in the metro will make sense
I would risk to say a little more on this.
Indeed, maybe the situation (in many countries) when the Carrier sells a lot of
TDM services.
But in general, packet services are enough these days for many carriers/regions.
Additionally, I am sure
14 matches
Mail list logo
