OP indicated they've tried both a direct laptop connection as well as another router. That seems to
meet the requirement for having ruled out his home-made router, though obviously I agree one should
attempt to rule out any possible errors by doing transparent packet sniffing analyzing the
Getting the FCC involved seems premature, since the OP hasn't yet ruled out a
problem with his home made router. Not that there's anything wrong with making
your own router, but it seems there is a burden of proof on the end user to
demonstrate the problem isn't at with the CPE. Even a test as
It appears that Matt Corallo said:
>But, like they say, modern whois knows where to look, no need to use anything
>else, I think as long
>as you're not stuck trying to use macOS or something else shipping weird
>ancient un-updated unix tools.
If you're inclined to roll your own, I keep a set
I've always had good luck with https://consumercomplaints.fcc.gov/hc/en-us. This tends to result in
a higher-level tech getting assigned to your ticket at least at larger providers. Depending on where
you are, your local government may have a similar process (e.g. in NYC the city has a similar
It extremely depends on who you're trying to reach and from what location.
We've seen lots of T1s have congested peering lately. Unfortunately these
days, having uncongested path requires paying a lot of attention and
distributing your traffic yourself rather than simply handing it off to
your
On 7/14/23 4:05 PM, Darin Steffl wrote:
This screams of entitlement. If you can't afford $250 a year for ARIN,
you probably shouldn't be starting a new business. Sorry
Why do you assume that I was even thinking about cost.
I was talking purely about understanding and how it could go either
Where did I EVER say I couldn't afford it and wasn't going to pay. Please
quit assuming!!
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 5:07 PM Darin Steffl
wrote:
> This screams of entitlement. If you can't afford $250 a year for ARIN, you
> probably shouldn't be starting a new business. Sorry
>
> On Fri, Jul 14,
> If you can't afford $250 a year for ARIN, you probably shouldn't be
starting a new business.
That seems a little tone deaf and extremely insensitive to a lot of
non-profit organizations who fight for every penny they can.
-Matt
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 3:06 PM Darin Steffl
wrote:
> This
This screams of entitlement. If you can't afford $250 a year for ARIN, you
probably shouldn't be starting a new business. Sorry
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 4:00 PM Grant Taylor via NANOG
wrote:
> On 7/14/23 12:04 PM, Robert Webb wrote:
> > For all of you who have historical knowledge of how ARIN
On 7/14/23 12:04 PM, Robert Webb wrote:
For all of you who have historical knowledge of how ARIN has/does
operate, throw that out the window and look at it from a newcomer
point of view and the wording being taken at face value.
Drive by comment:
I can see how someone not in the know -- like
Robert, we will look to make the text more clear.
Thanks
John Sweeting, ARIN CCO
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 14, 2023, at 2:17 PM, Robert Webb wrote:
No, I didn't quit reading..
The issue being a newcomer and not fully versed on the levels, I never made the
connection of the /36 to the
No, I didn't quit reading..
The issue being a newcomer and not fully versed on the levels, I never made
the connection of the /36 to the 2X-Small Category. A simple addition of
adding in a reference to that category would make it a lot more clear..
Something as simple as changing to the below,
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Global
IPv4 Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to
On Fri, 14 Jul 2023, Robert Webb wrote:
For all of you who have historical knowledge of how ARIN has/does operate,
throw that out the window and look at it from a newcomer point of view and the
wording being taken at
face value.
You just stopped reading after the part you liked :)
"There
Call for Participation -- ICANN DNSSEC and Security Workshop for ICANN7 Annual
General Meeting
In cooperation with the ICANN Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC),
we are planning a DNSSEC and Security Workshop for the ICANN78 Annual General
Meeting being held as a hybrid meeting
For all of you who have historical knowledge of how ARIN has/does operate,
throw that out the window and look at it from a newcomer point of view and
the wording being taken at face value.
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 12:52 PM August Yang via NANOG
wrote:
> > *There is a temporary IPv6 fee waiver
If possible, put a network tap in-between the router and the ONT, and sniff
the traffic.
I've seen this recently where in a very specific circumstance (two hardware
vendors, and only with CGNAT IPs), one side stopped responding to ARP
requests. The tap capture showed the request going out, but
Same in the continental US via Chicago, no widespread issues here but we egress
less than 100gbps via 1299 so we’re small potatoes. We sometimes notice QUIC
streams to 7018 having trouble, but nothing worth complaining about yet.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 14, 2023, at 12:15, Mark Tinka
Hello,
I think you misread the ARIN fee waiver guideline, they basically state that
you can get up to a /36 of IPv6 space, 2x-Small, while paying for 3X-Small
pricing.
Rishi Panthee
On Jul 14, 2023, at 11:37 AM, Robert Webb wrote:
Sorry for the completely off topic rant here, but maybe it
*There is a temporary IPv6 fee waiver for organizations in the
3X-Small service category. A 3X-Small organization may receive
registry services for up to a /36 of total IPv6 space and remain in
the 3X-Small service category. This waiver will expire 31 December 2026.
IMHO the wording here is
Sorry for the completely off topic rant here, but maybe it will garner some
attention from the ARIN folks.
So I am attempting a small startup business and and initially building out
three sites and thought it would be good to register and upfront get my own
IPv6 space instead of leasing from some
On 7/14/23 13:55, Drew Weaver wrote:
Has anyone else been having near constant issues with traffic
transiting AS 1299 being lost due to their links being oversubscribed?
We pick them up in London, so we haven't seen that. But we also have a
healthy mix of transit providers + peering, so
On 14.07.2023 15:44, Mel Beckman wrote:
The first thing I would do is to try a different RJ45 cable AND router to rule
out your cable or homemade router being the problem. Yes, you’ll have to pick
up a cheap router, but any $50 gadget, such as a Mikrotik RB or Ubiquiti ER-X
will do. Most
The first thing I would do is to try a different RJ45 cable AND router to rule
out your cable or homemade router being the problem. Yes, you’ll have to pick
up a cheap router, but any $50 gadget, such as a Mikrotik RB or Ubiquiti ER-X
will do. Most network techs have a garage full of castoff
Hi all - I apoligize for the not-necessarily-on-topic post, but I've been
struggling with this issue for the past two
weeks and am about out of ideas and options other than ask here.
The short version is I recently got FIOS at my (new) house, and plugged in my
router (SFF PC running Vyos).
Has anyone else been having near constant issues with traffic transiting AS
1299 being lost due to their links being oversubscribed?
Off-list is fine, I am just trying to get a sense of what is going on there.
Thanks,
-Drew
26 matches
Mail list logo
