Hello Folks,
Any good alternatives to Ciena Blue Planet out there?
Regards,
Paschal Masha
On 8/21/23 7:09 PM, Diogo Montagner wrote:
I would first try to understand what you are trying to achieve. JUNOS is
very flexible on this front and I am wondering why you think yacc is the
right way to achieve what you are trying to do.
Drive by comment:
Perhaps the OP is trying to parse a
Good luck with your pursuit with that attitude.
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 9:48 AM Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM) <
lyn...@orthanc.ca> wrote:
> OFFS people, spare me the bikeshed. It was a simple yes/no question.
> In case you missed it, here is the decision tree:
>
>
> /---\
> |
No, but they do however work just great as an active-active pair of routers
when cross linked and iBGP peered to each other and everything downstream
connected to each one.
Chris
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 9:43 AM Pascal Masha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does the MX204 support virtual chassis setup?
>
>
On 8/22/23 16:46, Tom Beecher wrote:
Again, as it was stated, the size of or number of BGP communities
wasn't the problem anyway; it was hashing / memory storage. And you
know what? Hashing / memory storage HAS been a problem with multiple
vendors in many other contexts, not just BGP
*facepalm*
You asked for a cost-free, publicly visible and available tool.
The lack of such does *not* mean tools don't exist. It just means you
won't find them available for free to the general public.
Asking if X exists and being told 'no' does not say anything about whether
Y exists or not.
OFFS people, spare me the bikeshed. It was a simple yes/no question.
In case you missed it, here is the decision tree:
/---\
| START |
\---/
|
|
^
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
/Do
>
> What I am saying is that for those that have been fixed, unless someone
> can offer up any additional evidence in 2023, the size of the number of BGP
> communities attached to a path does not scream "danger" in 2023 hardware.
> And the T1600 is a long time ago.
>
Again, as it was stated,
> On Aug 22, 2023, at 10:39, Thomas Beer wrote:
> to make an (intermediate) summary so far, it's 2023 and there are no tools
> available
> for BGP, ASN and IX interconnection visualization static or dynamic?!
No, that is not at all correct. People have tools that solve their actual
needs. Do
I agree with the yang approach. I would probably convert to using Yang and
download the yang files for whatever code version you are running. For
every code version you can download the yang files.
Then you have a choice to decide, either right a yang to yacc conversion
tool or find one, or think
Hi All!
to make an (intermediate) summary so far, it's 2023 and there are no tools
available
for BGP, ASN and IX interconnection visualization static or dynamic?!
Nobody has a top-level understanding / awareness of the infrastructure
topology and fixes
"bottlenecks", route misconfiguration et
Sorry, I don't know the answer to your initial inquiry
| We already have cron jobs running on the switches that tftp the config file
to a server, and I'd prefer to leverage off that.
Perhaps an easy interim adaptation would be to modify your scheduled job
to tftp the latest xml or json then
I would first try to understand what you are trying to achieve. JUNOS is
very flexible on this front and I am wondering why you think yacc is the
right way to achieve what you are trying to do.
If no one (or very few) these days is using yacc grammar for parsing router
configs, that should be a
Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM) wrote on 22/08/2023 01:27:
Because I've been writing yacc grammars for decades. I just wanted to
see if someone had already done it, as that would save me some time.
But if there's nothing out there I'll just roll one myself.
check out xorp and vyos - both
On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 at 03:30, Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM)
wrote:
> Because I've been writing yacc grammars for decades. I just wanted to
> see if someone had already done it, as that would save me some time.
> But if there's nothing out there I'll just roll one myself.
I sympathise with
15 matches
Mail list logo
