Canadian regulator CRTC hires private company to investigate 2022 Rogers outage

CRTC hires private company to investigate 2022 Rogers outage Critics say regulator being too secretive about probe, too slow to force more transparency from big telecoms https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/crtc-rogers-outage-investigation-1.6963052 CBC News has learned Canada's

Re: So what do you think about the scuttlebutt of Musk interfering in Ukraine?

On 9/14/23 6:34 AM, Dave Taht wrote: This is one of those threads where I do think folk would benefit from hearing from the horses' mouths. In a recent bio of musk published this past week, the author claimed that starlink withdrew service over crimea based on the knowledge it was going to be

Re: So what do you think about the scuttlebutt of Musk interfering in Ukraine?

On 9/14/23 9:26 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: *nods* likely plenty of similar examples by less polarizing people. Then lets hear them? It certainly seems like an  operational issue if this starts to become common. How is it dealt with if at all beyond diversity which is hard to come by with LEO

Re: Google Contact

https://www.peeringdb.com/net/433 Please read the notes in their PeeringDB entry. It lists instructions on how to set that up. Cheers, Mike On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 1:07 PM Pascal Masha wrote: > > Hello Folks, > > Anyone from Google who can assist setup BGP peering through SFMIX IX, kindly >

Re: mail.nanog.org broken v6 reverse DNS

On 9/14/23 2:12 PM, Bryan Fields wrote: On 9/14/23 1:35 PM, Chris Adams wrote: While wondering at high spam scores for NANOG mail, I noticed that it's in part because of broken reverse DNS for mail.nanog.org's IPv6 address. The address is 2001:1838:2001:8::20, with reverse delegated to

Re: Google Contact

More of receiving specifics via ISP that I don't wish to drop/filter compared to aggregates via the router servers. On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:22 PM TJ Trout wrote: > Having trouble using the route servers? > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2023, 9:37 AM Pascal Masha wrote: > >> Hello Folks, >> >> Anyone

Re: Google Contact

Thank Robert! This is the way. On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 9:11 PM Robert Story wrote: > On Thu 2023-09-14 19:33:42+0300 Pascal wrote: > > Anyone from Google who can assist setup BGP peering through SFMIX IX, > > kindly contact me off list. > > I have contacts at google, and when I asked a similar

Re: Google Contact

Having trouble using the route servers? On Thu, Sep 14, 2023, 9:37 AM Pascal Masha wrote: > Hello Folks, > > Anyone from Google who can assist setup BGP peering through SFMIX IX, > kindly contact me off list. > > Thanks > Regards > > Paschal Masha >

Re: mail.nanog.org broken v6 reverse DNS

On 9/14/23 1:35 PM, Chris Adams wrote: While wondering at high spam scores for NANOG mail, I noticed that it's in part because of broken reverse DNS for mail.nanog.org's IPv6 address. The address is 2001:1838:2001:8::20, with reverse delegated to ns1.scservers.com and ns2.scservers.com... but

mail.nanog.org broken v6 reverse DNS

While wondering at high spam scores for NANOG mail, I noticed that it's in part because of broken reverse DNS for mail.nanog.org's IPv6 address. The address is 2001:1838:2001:8::20, with reverse delegated to ns1.scservers.com and ns2.scservers.com... but those hostnames don't resolve. The auth

[NANOG-announce] Don't Miss Out! Register Now For NANOG 89! + More

*Don't Miss Out! Register Now For NANOG 89! * *Our Next Meeting Will Take Place 16 - 18 Oct. in San Diego* *REGISTER NOW * *Candidate Statements of Support Open* *Key Dates 2023* *13 September - Statements of Support* for Board of Director Candidates open*

Don't Miss Out! Register Now For NANOG 89! + More

*Don't Miss Out! Register Now For NANOG 89! * *Our Next Meeting Will Take Place 16 - 18 Oct. in San Diego* *REGISTER NOW * *Candidate Statements of Support Open* *Key Dates 2023* *13 September - Statements of Support* for Board of Director Candidates open*

Google Contact

Hello Folks, Anyone from Google who can assist setup BGP peering through SFMIX IX, kindly contact me off list. Thanks Regards Paschal Masha

Re: So what do you think about the scuttlebutt of Musk interfering in Ukraine?

*nods* likely plenty of similar examples by less polarizing people. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From: "Randy Bush" To: "NANOG mailing list" Sent: Thursday, September 14,

Re: So what do you think about the scuttlebutt of Musk interfering in Ukraine?

perhaps this is not a nanog operational topic

Re: So what do you think about the scuttlebutt of Musk interfering in Ukraine?

Mr. Isaacson's tweet (or X , or whatever the hell it is now ) is essentially saying Russia invading Ukraine was *not* a major war, but Ukraine attacking back to defend itself would be. Exceptionally dumb comment. I also find it exceptionally rich that Musk uses their 'Terms of Service' as a

Re: So what do you think about the scuttlebutt of Musk interfering in Ukraine?

This is one of those threads where I do think folk would benefit from hearing from the horses' mouths. In a recent bio of musk published this past week, the author claimed that starlink withdrew service over crimea based on the knowledge it was going to be used for a surprise attack. Starlink -

Re: So what do you think about the scuttlebutt of Musk interfering in Ukraine?

> Starlink isn't a monopoly. Ukraine could have guided their munitions with > Iridium or another satellite Internet system. Don't forget GLONASS.  On Thu Sep 14, 2023, 03:10 AM GMT, William Herrin wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 5:47 PM Michael Thomas wrote: >>

Re: So what do you think about the scuttlebutt of Musk interfering in Ukraine?

I have a feeling he’s fired far too much of his legal and compliance team to realise --srs From: NANOG on behalf of Michael Thomas Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2023 6:17:17 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: So what do you think about the scuttlebutt of Musk

Re: AFRINIC placed in receivership

On 9/13/23 9:27 PM, Bryan Fields wrote: > I think this qualifies as potentially operational. > > Afrinic placed in receivership, board elections to be held in six months: > https://archive.ph/jOFE4 Looks like archive.ph is having problems. This is the original article. >