Re: Fastly Peering Contact

2023-12-05 Thread Tom Samplonius
Me too. Fastly has been promising me peering every year for the past five years. They are just a few cabinets over, so it has been pretty frustrating. Tom Sent from my iPad > On Dec 5, 2023, at 1:25 PM, Ian Chilton wrote: > >  > Hi Peter, > > Sorry you didn't get a response. > > I

Re: Outside plant - prewire customer demarc preference

2023-12-05 Thread Sean Donelan
You've misunderstood the goal. The intent is not to protect the fiber, but to make it easier for the field tech installing new service in a neat way through finished construction and concealled raceways, without cutting sheetrock or stapling exposed cabling across walls. Trying to prevent

Re: Outside plant - prewire customer demarc preference

2023-12-05 Thread Martin Hannigan
Thanks Sean! Looks like over priced residential inner duct to me. Sheet rock accomplishes pretty much the same thing. I want reliable home Internet too, but it’s not a CO. I’d install a PVC sleeve on the OSP to ISP transition. The risk of outage isn’t going to materially move one way or the other

Re: Fiber/OSP Technician Training and Apprenticeship Programs

2023-12-05 Thread Aaron Axvig via NANOG
On 2023-11-16 2:51 pm, Rhys Barrie via NANOG wrote: Hey all, I've recently been working with our county's broadband task force, investigating the expansion and equity of broadband networks on a local and state level. Through that, it's become clear that there's a painful shortage of fiber /

Internet Governance opportunity for NANOG community

2023-12-05 Thread Eduardo Diaz
Dear NANOG Community, John Curran, President and CEO of ARIN, recently underscored the Internet's significant transformation at NANOG 89. In this context, I invite you to consider participating in our upcoming 2024 North American School of Internet Governance (NASIG 2024 )

Re: Outside plant - prewire customer demarc preference

2023-12-05 Thread Sean Donelan
I should have known better, network engineers don't work on the physical infrastructure very much anymore - memories of sitting on concrete floors crimping cable ends in to many IXPs :-) If you never seen or installed ENT Electrical Nonmetallic Tubing Conduit, also known as "smurf tube" --

Re: Any comprehensive listing of where Google's IPs originate from?

2023-12-05 Thread Tom Beecher
> > i would expect that google announces the /16 at least from 'everywhere', > yes. > I see the specific /18s Drew asked about initially. Didn't check for the covering /16. On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 1:29 PM Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 11:06 AM Tom Beecher wrote: > > > >

Re: Fastly Peering Contact

2023-12-05 Thread Ian Chilton
Hi Peter, Sorry you didn't get a response. I only just started at Fastly, but I can look / nudge the right person if you drop me an e-mail off-list with details. Ian On Tue, 5 Dec 2023, at 9:14 PM, Peter Potvin via NANOG wrote: > Looking for someone on the Fastly peering team to reach out

Fastly Peering Contact

2023-12-05 Thread Peter Potvin via NANOG
Looking for someone on the Fastly peering team to reach out regarding peering on a couple mutual IXPs - sent an email to the peering contact as listed on PeeringDB and never heard back, and also have a few colleagues who have experienced the same issue. Regards, Peter Potvin | Executive Director

Re: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

2023-12-05 Thread Ray Bellis
On 05/12/2023 20:08, Christopher Morrow wrote: is the test framework documented where others could setup/run the test(s)? :) (perhaps for mr hare I mean, or me! :) ) https://github.com/isc-projects/perflab https://www.isc.org/docs/bellis-oarc-perflab.pdf Are the tests for authoritative

Re: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

2023-12-05 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 10:17 AM Ray Bellis wrote: > > > > On 05/12/2023 12:29, Michael Hare via NANOG wrote: > > > At quick glance following the ISC link I didn’t see the compute > > infrastructure [core count] needed to get 1Mpps. There is an obvious > > difference between 99% load of ~500rps

Re: Any comprehensive listing of where Google's IPs originate from?

2023-12-05 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 11:06 AM Tom Beecher wrote: > > From my observations, all us-east-5 IPs are announced via transit and peering > at all of my locations Chicago and east. > i would expect that google announces the /16 at least from 'everywhere', yes. > On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 9:11 AM Drew

Re: Any comprehensive listing of where Google's IPs originate from?

2023-12-05 Thread Tom Beecher
>From my observations, all us-east-5 IPs are announced via transit and peering at all of my locations Chicago and east. On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 9:11 AM Drew Weaver wrote: > Hello, > > > > We are trying to reduce latency to a region in Google Cloud which we are > in the same city of. Latency is

Re: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

2023-12-05 Thread Ray Bellis
On 05/12/2023 12:29, Michael Hare via NANOG wrote: At quick glance following the ISC link I didn’t see the compute infrastructure [core count] needed to get 1Mpps.  There is an obvious difference between 99% load of ~500rps and 1M, so we can maybe advise to not undersize ADNS if that's an

RE: What are these Google IPs hammering on my DNS server?

2023-12-05 Thread Michael Hare via NANOG
Damian- Not Google or ISCs fault, our customers have made some decisions that have exasperated the issues. By and away the biggest problem facing my customers is that they have chosen a stateful border firewall that collapses due to session exhaustion and they put everything, including aDNS,