On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 07:15 -0400, Brian Raaen wrote:
Looks like some random person registered this one. The domain and ip
do not look related to cisco even though someone has falsely pasted
their logo all over the site.
(1) If Cisco were responsible, would they want to advertise the fact ?
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 08:33 -0500, N. Max Pierson wrote:
Either way, it's pathetic. If someone is going to slander in the
fashion the site has done, they should at least put a contact form
somewhere for some feedback :)
Slander means falsehood. Cisco tells lies ?
--
With best regards,
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 19:16 +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
And to end this thread as this effectively ends Diginotar troubles for
the Interwebz:
Dutch official statement:
http://www.opta.nl/nl/actueel/alle-publicaties/publicatie/?id=3469
Bedankt. Vertaling (my own translation, niet slecht
Hallo North Americans,
I am from Europe. A contributor on the Centos (the largest Red Hat
clone) list suggested I reposted my ARIN item on your list.
I have a BASH script called .w
It contains
#! /bin/bash
whois $1
host $1
When I type
.w 51.51.51.51
I
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 12:32 -0400, Jon Lewis wrote:
No he's not. He's complaining that sometime in the past few weeks (or is
it months now?) ARIN changed the behavior of their whois server. New
output for the query 209.208.0.1 is (omitting comments):
Internet Connect Company, Inc.
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 18:17 +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2011-09-12 17:40 , Always Learning wrote:
Dear person who is to scared to setup a regular email account in his own
full name.
Beste Fuzzel,
Mijn naam is Paul. It was at the bottom of my posting.
Sorry I have never ever had
6 matches
Mail list logo
