I've seen people push close to 10Gbps line rate with 1 byte packets on an Intel
card with PF_RING.
On 28 Jul 2015, at 1:40 am, lobna gouda lobna_go...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello David et Dan,
Are you going to perform the DDOS solution yourself, or you are looking for
a company to provide a
Hi,
I actually saw this issue a few weeks back but with a customer's website. It's
actually not a routing issue, but a DNS issue. If you check the IPs that
Verizon resolves for you, they'll be different from the IPs that other
resolvers will resolve.
It's weird, I know, but that's all the
8:10 PM, Ammar Zuberi wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone know of a direct phone number for someone with somewhat
authority at GTT? Our prefix has been hijacked by a customer of theirs and
we haven’t received any kind of response to our email and the guys on the
phone seem to not speak very good
Hi all,
Does anyone know of a direct phone number for someone with somewhat authority
at GTT? Our prefix has been hijacked by a customer of theirs and we haven’t
received any kind of response to our email and the guys on the phone seem to
not speak very good English.
Any ideas?
Ammar.
Hi,
Here in Dubai they have a wide FTTH deployment (almost 80% of homes and
offices) with almost no copper in the service provider networks.
They use these Planet devices in every deployment I've taken a look at so far.
Ammar
On 10 Feb 2015, at 6:42 pm, Ray Soucy r...@maine.edu wrote:
, this is useful information. From your perspective as a
user, do things seem fairly stable?
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Ammar Zuberi am...@fastreturn.net wrote:
Hi,
Here in Dubai they have a wide FTTH deployment (almost 80% of homes and
offices) with almost no copper in the service
So your idea is to block every HTTPS website?
On 18 Jan 2015, at 6:48 pm, Ca By cb.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, January 18, 2015, Grant Ridder shortdudey...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I wanted to see what opinions and thoughts were out there. What software,
appliances, or
Maybe your IP block isn’t being accepted by Verizon?
Can you traceroute it etc?
On Jan 17, 2015, at 1:00 AM, Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net wrote:
Anybody Verizon.net mail admins around?
I have a downstream customer on a newly-deployed IP allocation that
can't get to pop.verizon.net
Traceroute from my home connection in Dubai, United Arab Emirates:
traceroute to 129.250.35.250 (129.250.35.250), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 2.293 ms 1.549 ms 7.657 ms
2 94.203.22.1 (94.203.22.1) 3.281 ms 8.348 ms 8.494 ms
3 10.39.162.65 (10.39.162.65)
I’m stuck trying to find a virtual router environment that I can play with
flowspec on. We do have some Juniper routers, but they are in production and I
don’t think I want to touch flowspec on them just yet.
Does anyone have any experience or any ideas here? Even openbgpd?
On Jan 11, 2015,
Hi,
The AS number we were assigned by ARIN (AS14558) was previously owned by DANDY
and was in the EPOCH routing registry. We get conflicting route generations
from IRR due to this, is there anyone that can contact me off-list and get this
done or does anyone have any suggestions on how I can
I'd beg to differ on this one. The average attacks we're seeing are double
that, around the 30-40g mark. Since NTP and SSDP amplification began, we've
been seeing all kinds of large attacks.
Obviously, these can easily be blocked upstream to your network. Hibernia
Networks blocks them for us.
You'd notice that most people don't really know how big the attack that they're
sending is. I've done a lot of research into how these attacks actually work
and most of them are done by kids who don't really know what they're doing.
To them an attack is something that will take their target
At least you’re only having problems with the IPv6 version, I’ve spent about an
hour trying to get the IPv4 version of fakeroute working and I just can’t. I
even tried a few different ones.
Does anyone have a version that works? I have some fun things I’d like to do
with it ;)
Ammar.
On Dec
That’s exactly what I was thinking… Equinix doesn’t really have anything to do
with that part of the peering ecology.
On Dec 18, 2014, at 9:55 PM, Clayton Zekelman clay...@mnsi.net wrote:
I'm not sure how they can do that. Equinix is Layer 2 - your peering
parameters are between you
Doesn't the MetaMako device do exactly the same thing as the Glimmerglass
photonic switch?
Ammar
On 15 Dec 2014, at 2:50 pm, Peter teStrake peter.testr...@tradingscreen.com
wrote:
Hi Arnold,
I have recently been talking to these guys (
https://www.metamako.com/use-cases/ ) about
Hi,
Although this might not apply to you in the US, anyone else thinking about
trying this might want to check up on possible legal backlash from using one of
these devices. I know you can't legally use one of these in Dubai.
Ammar
On 16 Dec 2014, at 6:54 am, John Levine jo...@iecc.com
Hi,
We’re currently running the Arbor Peakflow SP with the TMS and it works very
well for us.
Best Regards,
Ammar Zuberi
FastReturn, Inc
Direct Line: +971 50 394 7299
Email: am...@fastreturn.net
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use
Hi,
A lot of new vendors have entered the DDoS attack prevention market other than
Arbor, I've seen carrier grade devices made by Huawei, NSFocus, RioRey and many
others.
If you're looking at something software based, I've used Andrisoft WanGuard and
would recommend it.
Ammar.
On 8 Dec
What’s a cheaper alternative to the MX104s?
We take a full BGP table and are on the AMS-IX and DE-CIX and are looking for a
new router. The MX series looks a bit out of budget but we’re currently looking
into the Brocade MLX series. We push under 10Gbps, but we do need 10Gbps
routing due to
, NL.
Best Regards,
Ammar Zuberi
FastReturn, Inc
Email: am...@fastreturn.net
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If
you have received it by mistake, please let us know by e-mail
Hi Sander,
It's more of a have to buy from them as opposed to a want to buy from them.
I'd much prefer NTT, but they are nowhere near where we are unfortunately.
Ammar.
On 29 Nov 2014, at 7:25 pm, Sander Steffann san...@steffann.nl wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have a contact for an account
Hi,
I’m pretty sure IX Reach can take you into an Equinix exchange, so it is
probably possible that they allow this kind of stuff to happen.
Ammar.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
Hi Conor,
I know this is possible since Hurricane Electric does it for IPv6 transit,
however, I'm not sure if it violates any exchange rules or if it's even a good
idea.
On 25 Nov 2014, at 10:47 pm, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com wrote:
I know typically peering exchanges are made for
24 matches
Mail list logo
