If the whole thing breaks, I'm taking a vacation.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Owen DeLong
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2014 8:52 PM
To: Patrick W. Gilmore
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: The Cidr Report
ROFLMAO Party in Bellevue is
Wow, I wish I could incoherent this typely!
Andrew
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 24, 2014, at 1:54 AM, Bryan Socha br...@digitalocean.com wrote:
Whats the big deal If your just arin, dont panic. Akamai and
digitalocean has been the only people aquire fair priced v4 putside
So, if there's more than 4 billion ants... what are they going to do?
Andrew
On 4/5/2014 1:44 AM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
Offered for your amusement--no followup.
http://kottke.org/14/04/the-anternet
Hi,
I found that finding them on IRC, or wherever it is that they
congregate, and simply talking to them until they incriminate themselves
tends to work best. I also found that firewalls, IDS, security audits,
antivirus, antimalware etc work almost not at all. The reason for this
is pretty
Would an ATT engineer who deals with uverse IPv6 please contact me off
list? I'm getting horrible throughput on your 6RD.
Thanks!
Andrew
Zach,
I've had no issues here since launching ipv6 other than that the
performance isn't amazing.
Andrew
On 1/8/2014 7:29 PM, Zach Hanna wrote:
OK. So who other than Andrew was able to get this working (and keep it
working) ?
I'm about to place an order for slow-verse for my residence...
If you're trying to do this cheaply, I'd recommend an appropriate sized
Mikrotik router, and perhaps something running digium's transcoding
hardware/Asterisk, or some Adtran hardware.
Don't put all this in one box.
Andrew
On 12/26/2013 11:33 AM, Nick Cameo wrote:
Hello Everyone,
We are
On 12/26/2013 12:05 PM, Alessandro Ratti wrote:
(maybe with 10G nics).
If he can afford a 10G link... he should be buying real gear... I mean,
look, I've got plenty of infrastructure horror stories, but lets not
cobble together our own 10gbit solutions, please? At least get one of
the
On 12/11/2013 10:11 AM, Eric Oosting wrote:
It brings a tear to my eye that it takes:
0) A long standing and well informed internet technologist;
1) specific, and potentially high end, CPE for the res;
2) specific and custom firmware, unsupported by CPE manufacturer ... or
anyone;
3) hand
Sina,
I'd recommend using Zenoss to monitor the remote end of the link at
least with /Status/Ping. You'll get alerts when Zenoss can't ping
across the link, and may be able to set up SNMP traps on your router for
the link itself going down.
DISCLOSURE: I work for Zenoss, however I used
Eric,
I'll note as a followup to the Ipv6 thread, I'm a _HUGE_ mikrotik fan.
One of the CCR models has 4 SFP's.
Andrew
On 11/26/2013 10:47 PM, Eric C. Miller wrote:
I'm looking at some non-Cisco price options to deliver more than 4 SFP slots
into a structure and was wondering if anyone
November 2013 22:22, Andrew D Kirch trel...@trelane.net wrote:
Status Available
Global IPv6 Address 2602:306:cddd:::1/64
Link-local IPv6 Address fe80::923e:abff::7e40
Router Advertisement Prefix 2602:306:cddd:::/64
IPV6 Delegated LAN Prefix 2602:306:cddd:::
2602
Special thanks to Alexander from ATT's Tier-2 dept, though my
suspicion is that that is not where he works, as he seems exceptionally
clueful.
Additional thanks to Owen DeLong who finally got me off my ass to
actually do this, I'll see you in the sky!
Ok, is this core routing? not really, but
On 10/29/2013 10:51 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
The Paley Center for Media reminds us that on this day in 1969 at 2230 PST, the
first link was turned up between UCLAs Sigma 7 and SRIs 940.
A photo of the laboratory logbook is included in the Wikipedia article:
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARPANET
On 9/18/2013 6:55 PM, Tammy Firefly wrote:
I used to run the AHBL and ARIN used to contact us when they recycled IP
space. We always removed when contacted by ARIN.
Andrew
ARIN hasnt contacted us for this since i've been involved with the ahbl
for ~5 years.
just a FYI.
Well, it'd seem we
On 9/18/2013 7:15 PM, Tammy Firefly wrote:
On 9/18/13 5:07 PM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
On 9/18/2013 6:55 PM, Tammy Firefly wrote:
I used to run the AHBL and ARIN used to contact us when they recycled IP
space. We always removed when contacted by ARIN.
Andrew
ARIN hasnt contacted us
On 9/18/2013 9:02 PM, John Levine wrote:
This is pathetic. ARIN is supposed to be working as a steward of this
IP space. When you have policies that make it more difficult to use the
IP space this isn't even remotely close to stewardship. It's pathetic,
Unfortunately, a surprising number of
On 6/27/2013 3:43 PM, Måns Nilsson wrote:
Subject: Re: SixXS Contact Date: Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:47:51AM -0400 Quoting
Anthony Williams (alby.willi...@verizon.com):
Can I piggy back on that inquiry and request a reset of my ISK points
after committing a faux pas with respect to going
On 6/23/2013 11:37 AM, shawn wilson wrote:
We currently use Triplite stuff but they've got an issue where after a few
minutes, they stop accepting new tcp connections. We're adding a new 30A
circuit and I'm thinking of going with APC (ran them in the past and never
had any issues). However, I
On 6/10/2013 11:00 AM, Larry Stites wrote:
Too many of us look upon Americans as dollar chasers.
As an Objectivist, I resemble this. I still hate having to agree with a
spammer though :(
Andrew
I really wish people would get over themselves and get to work. Work is
a place where things get done, not where people piss and moan about
every single perceived slight they can come up with.
Andrew
On 9/27/2012 2:10 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
for is: Troglodyte
1:
A person considered to be reclusive, reactionary, out of date, or brutish.
/bill (top posting like a civilized human...)
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:28:04PM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 02:57:36PM -0400, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
I really wish people would
that are so pressing in your mind.
Can we kill this thread (oh dear, i'm advocating violence again...) and get
back to Network
Operations? Please?
/bill
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 04:47:16PM -0400, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
This isn't a real issue. HUNGER is a real issue. WAR is a real issue.
12
On 6/30/2012 3:11 AM, Tyler Haske wrote:
How to run a datacenter 101. Have more then one location, preferably
far apart. It being Amazon I would expect more. :/
Based on? Clouds are nothing more than outsourced responsibility. My
business has stopped while my IT department explains to me
Randy,
Ublox LEA-7T's are either out, or will be out shortly in the Evaluation
Kit product. Stick your antenna on that, and it provides a very solid
1PPS to NTPd. Should be less than $300 shipped.
Andrew
Paul,
I just wanted to point out that you're a horrible person for employing
people at a sustainable level, for giving away the product of your
company for free, and for having the temerity to assist the FBI, on
break-even basis ensuring that users of the internet continue to have
access to
On 3/30/2012 4:41 PM, Henry Yen wrote:
uunet/vzb will terminate its United States Newsreader and Newsfeed
services on March 31, 2012, with no plans to offer a replacement, and
any content/data remaining after that date will be unrecoverably deleted.
does anyone on NANOG have any thoughtful
On 2/17/2012 1:35 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Please post your top 3 favorite components/parts you'd like to see in a
vending machine at your colo; please be as specific as possible; don't
let vendor specificity scare you off.
Cheers,
-- jra
console cables (cisco juniper adtran)
1' extension cords
I can confirm using LX SFP's for under 100' runs with no problems.
Except for the one site that ordered Multi-Mode fiber...
Andrew
On 1/26/2012 12:27 AM, Aftab Siddiqui wrote:
Theoretically speaking Yes there should be an issue while using the LX SFP
for short range because it may damage
From memory Ameen Pishdadi is the owner of GIGENET, run by Paul Ashley
(Aka XEROX), and comprised of the IP space and assets of FOONET. One
would think that he has much contact with law enforcement.
Or does my memory fail me?
Andrew
On 1/22/2012 8:16 PM, A. Pishdadi wrote:
Hello,
We
On 1/8/2012 8:48 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
And maybe ask the author of whatever goober with firewall script
that is to rm -rf and securely delete his code?
[old term from the nanae days, abbreviated to GWF]
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Randy Bushra...@psg.com wrote:
probably does
works for me
On 12/20/2011 10:08 PM, andrew.wallace wrote:
I just want to say happy xmas to everyone at NANOG.
I'm about to sign off for the holidays.
Andrew
enjoy your chistmas, and you don't have to come back after the holidays,
we'll be fine without you.
Andrew
On 12/14/2011 4:20 PM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
You should easily qualify for a /32 or larger IPv6 block.
And it's curious that errors that are likely to be there for decades
are just now trying to be fixed as IPv4 pool is depleted, isn't it ?
His users can also switch to DECNET and reach about as
On 6/25/2011 7:43 PM, Paul Graydon wrote:
Take a guess what the datacenter our equipment is currently hosted in
uses. Yet another reason to be glad of a datacenter move that's
coming up.
Why can't we just all use DC and be happy?
On 6/5/2011 8:11 PM, Bryan Fields wrote:
On 6/5/2011 19:39, Gadi Evron wrote:
The title is misleading, as this is more about denying access. But
this is still quite interesting. I don't think this has *any*
operational implications, but every operator to see this was immediately
worried. I
On 6/5/2011 8:44 PM, John Peach wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:11:21 -0400
Bryan Fieldsbr...@bryanfields.net wrote:
On 6/5/2011 19:39, Gadi Evron wrote:
The title is misleading, as this is more about denying access. But
this is still quite interesting. I don't think this has *any*
operational
On 6/5/2011 10:11 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:48:56 EDT, Bryan Fields said:
On 6/5/2011 20:44, John Peach wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:11:21 -0400 Bryan Fieldsbr...@bryanfields.net wrote:
This is the same organization that says there is no basic human right to
On 4/13/11 4:50 PM, Leigh Porter wrote:
On 13 Apr 2011, at 21:45, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
and pigs fly
Well, sometimes they do.
There underlying problem here is flying sheep:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vkw2DdoskPY
Note the accurate summarization of the entire issue.
Yes that's it.
Perhaps dslreports would be a more useful forum for this question?
On 06/22/2010 01:51 PM, Deric Kwok wrote:
Hi
It is very nice that Ina replied me about mtu help
Now I am using ping to check
but not sure it is my modem or DSL company issue?
C:\Documents and Settings\derekping yahoo.com -f
On 06/17/2010 09:52 AM, James Smith wrote:
So my questions to the NANOG community are: Would you recommend HP over
Cisco or Juniper?
Not for core networking.
How is HP's functionality and performance compared to Cisco or Juniper?
HP's Procurve switches have been around forever, they're about
Really not core network related as it never touches a wire, let alone
the core, but try www.xorp.org.
Andrew
On 06/01/2010 04:50 PM, Andrey Khomyakov wrote:
Good times!
We are starting to play around with VMware SRM and they virtual subnets
that supposedly have to be able migrate from site
I'm not sure why anyone is running SCO Unix. Call their technical
support, enjoy the crickets.
Andrew
On 05/27/2010 03:01 PM, Brian Feeny wrote:
I don't think this is the appropriate list for asking a question about a problem with
telnet to a sco box. I don't understand why you think
Is there anyone here who is legitimate using a freebie webmail account?
I am proposing that the NANOG administration drop everything originating
from commonly used webmail providers, and add further RHS filters as
additional providers are identified as problems.
Andrew
Andrew D Kirch wrote:
Is there anyone here who is legitimate using a freebie webmail account?
I am proposing that the NANOG administration drop everything originating
from commonly used webmail providers, and add further RHS filters as
additional providers are identified as problems.
Andrew
Guillaume FORTAINE wrote:
This is a very pertinent question. My reply would be :
How much money would you evaluate a security incident on your Cisco
device ?
Because, the fundamental questions are :
a) How much value does your network bring to your business ?
b) How much money are you
Guillaume FORTAINE wrote:
On 03/20/2010 09:12 PM, Gadi Evron wrote:
2. Show you are responsive and responsible in handling issues in your
own back yard.
Nice, I've used mountains (Denali, Everest, Olympus, etc) in the past to
name systems. Used profanity for awhile to name machines, there's
really quite a bit of it, and every language has it's own set, giving a
large pool to choose from. Sadly, when outages occurred, it was
somewhat difficult to
Right now we're using Asterisk, Bluetop/Blonder Tongue, and cable modems
with a sip interface to provide
triple play in large apartment complexes 300+ units). not really core
infrastructure but the phones have to ring.
Andrew
jings...@teekoo.com wrote:
Hi,
My friend is constructing an ISP
, and Kevin Mitnick, whom no one gives a
damn about, were targeted...
FTFY
Andrew D Kirch
where all of my traffic is peering anyway.
This discussion is about ATT, not you.
William
While I agree, I certainly believe that due to the nature of some of the
content
on 4chan, ATT can make a strong Good Samaritan claim under 47USC230.
There's
always TOR.
Andrew D Kirch
Argus http://argus.tcp4me.com
Andrew
Matthew Huff wrote:
I'm putting together a list of NMS systems for system (hardware, cpu util%,
memory util%) and application monitoring rather than network management for
our environment. We are looking for low cost / opensource solutions that have
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 12:43:15PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
sadly, naively turning up tor to help folk who wish to be anonymous in
hard times gets one a lot of assertive email from self-important people
who wear formal clothes.
folk who learn this the hard
Randy Bush wrote:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/06/ftc_sues_shuts_down_n_calif_we.html
while allegedly a black hat, this is the first case i know of in which
the usg has shut down an isp. nose of camel? first they came for ...
randy
Foonet.
Well said, if you can't build it, don't trust it.
Andrew (top posted as per previous convention)
Skywing wrote:
You are brave indeed to trust your packets over the air without a VPN or
tunnel of some sort.
While it sounds like Sprint is doing something, for lack of a better word,
lame,
Steve Church wrote:
Beavis aka John Lopez:
I, for one, am glad you're interested in stopping the abuse at its source.
Thank you.
Steve Linford:
why not ACL the source at your router or at whatever device is being
(packeted).
Mr. Lopez is contributing to the welfare of the net as
http://www.webpowerswitch.com/ I've used these quite a bit. Depending
on the model you can get per port or per zone power management, and it
sends alerts if it's not in the state it's supposed to be, and some of
them can auto kickover things like routers if they suddenly cant route
(might be
Tom Sparks (Applied Operations) wrote:
Basically is what it boils down to for me - its easy to blame
an NSP/ISP/Hoster for what their clients do, it takes real dedication to
find out whats *actually* going on.
We did, and now we're solving the problem.
Andrew
*Hobbit* wrote:
Where's
the BACKBONE to go after the real high-volume sources, rather than
continuing to kick sand in the face of some podunk little guy who
can no longer defend himself?
_H*
He never could defend himself, but he still hosts these companies
(though months and years later
Considering the years of abuse, DNSBL listings, ROKSO listings, further
abuse, and silence at the abuse switch, I _CERTAINLY_ would not send
Atrivo abuse reports, I would send them to the upstreams instead.
Considering the almost 40 page white paper produced last month on the
abuse from
Gadi Evron wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Russell Mitchell wrote:
Hello all,
Andrew:
It is truly enlightening, to say the least, that you want to talk
about all of the SBL Listings, all of the DNSBL Listings, and all of
the abuse on our network has never had action taken.
Don't kick someone
Russell Mitchell wrote:
Andrew:
If you have seen how Spamhaus handles our resolved SBL Listings, you
would know.
Those 6 listings have been resolved for a week now. John Reid and
his goons only provide swift LISTINGS, _NOT_ delistings.
Possibly why they're so widely used.
In the past 12
Brandon Butterworth wrote:
Anton's post that GX is still providing them transit is a bit curious, since
I was under the impression GX had severed all ties with Atrivo. But the
table does not lie, a path of 174 3549 27595 is clearly transit. GX, care
to comment?
After poking for a bit,
Justin Sharp wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but knowing how bad Linux is at being a router and that their
products are Linux-based, I'm afraid to give one a try. J products
are based on a competing non-Linux platform that has a better
reputation for routing.
Enough with the bipartisan
Zed Usser wrote:
Hi all!
There's been some discussion on the list regarding software routers lately and
this piqued my interest. Does anybody have any recent performance and
capability statistics (eg. forwarding rates with full BGP tables and N ethernet
interfaces) or any pointer to what the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone from sbcglobal out there? i'm seeing a routing
loop. Please
contact me off list thanks.
What did your upstream transit supplier advise before you
escalated this to the global audience at NANOG?
This is the second time in 24hrs you
Would a Comcast routing engineer contact me off list regarding a routing
issue in Chicago?
Andrew
n3td3v wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Pedram M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems to have made some headlines.
http://news.google.com/news?ned=ushl=enned=usq=amazon+downbtnG=Search+News
Maybe because its a major global website like Yahoo.com. Microsoft.com
and CNN.com?
All the
68 matches
Mail list logo
