Mel Beckman wrote:
But bug reports and response can be measured, at least by those with
support contracts for the commercial products. I found PFSense less
reliable by a quite large margin than commercial offerings. Plus when
I have a problem, I can open a case and somebody else is working on
Mel Beckman wrote:
The question of code quality is always a difficult one, since in FOSS
it’s public and often found lacking, but in private source you may
never know. In these cases I rely on the vendor’s public statements
about their development processes and certifications (e.g., ICSA).
amuse wrote:
> One question I have is: Is there any reason to believe that the source
> code for Sonicwall, Cisco, etc are any better than the PFSense code? Or
> are we just able to see the PFSense code and make unfounded assumptions
> that the commercial code is in better shape?
Perhaps not. In
Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> If customer does not react, put it on quarantine VLAN. This can be
> automated too. Wrong MTU => open internal case, contact customers
> email, no customer response in N days, quarantine VLAN.
>
> Even the most outrageous success stories in the world, majority of the
> people
Randy Bush wrote:
> some friends and i were talking about recent routing cfs, and found we
> needed a clearer taxonomy. i throw this out.
>
> leak - i receive P and send it on to folk to whom i should not send
>it for business reasons (transit, peer, ...)
>
> mis-origination - i
I think you mean what is best described here:
http://www.swinog.ch/meetings/swinog7/BGP_filtering-swinog.ppt
--Aris
Suresh Ramasubramanian mailto:ops.li...@gmail.com
Thursday, August 14, 2014 04:59
Swisscom or some other European SP has / used to have a limit where they
would not accept more
How much ahead of my time would I be if I was to ask for CFP/CFP2
transceivers supporting MACsec? (at a reasonably competitive price)
--Aris
Contacted ip@indosat.com about this, I urge others to do the same.
--Aris
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Andrew (Andy) Ashley
andre...@aware.co.thwrote:
Hi All,
I am a network admin for Aware Corporation AS18356 (Thailand), as
mentioned in the alert.
We operate a BGPMon PeerMon node
the 32-bit ASN BGP communities issue.
Aris Lambrianidis
Hi,
You could try n...@jazztel.com instead, hopefully they'll reply.
Aris Lambrianidis
AMS-IX B.V.
http://www.ams-ix.net/
On Nov 26, 2012, at 11:01 PM, Network Department r...@alfatelecom.cz wrote:
Hello!
Could somebody provide me peering contact for AS12715 (Jazz Telecom
S.A.)? I see
the dude with RFC5549
written on the back of his laptop).
Aris Lambrianidis,
AMS-IX
Shacolby Jackson shacolby at bluejeans.com writes:
I know this is a bit off topic since Amsterdam isn't exactly in North
America but... Has anyone used AMS-IX for a private interconnect from one
datacenter to another to avoid a classic local loop to another party or
provider? For example,
12 matches
Mail list logo
