RE: why not AS number based prefixes aggregation

2008-09-08 Thread Boyd, Benjamin R
-Original Message- From: Paul Francis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 2:31 PM To: Ricardo Oliveira; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: why not AS number based prefixes aggregation This thread begs an interesting question: what is the right amount of granularity

RE: Revealed: The Internet's well known BGP behavior

2008-08-28 Thread Boyd, Benjamin R
We've encountered the same diligence with LVL3, especially after acquisitions where records haven't been updated yet. Although a little annoying it's quite refreshing. -Original Message- From: Eric Spaeth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 1:41 AM To: Jon Lewis;

RE: interger to I P address

2008-08-27 Thread Boyd, Benjamin R
The harder way: Decimal: 1089055123 Hex (dashes inserted at octals): 40-E9-A9-93 Decimal (of each octet): 64-233-169-147 IP Address: 64.233.169.147 The Python way import socket, struct socket.inet_ntoa(struct.pack('l', 1089055123)) '64.233.169.147' The Perl way: sub ntoa { my