> On Aug 21, 2023, at 8:32 AM, heasley wrote:
>
> Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 08:06:11AM +0200, Thomas Beer:
>>
>> I meant ix internet exchange path visualization and an online tool to take
>> a look at it in (near) real time!
We currently do not have any near real time path visualizations. If you
Censorship does not need to be complete to be highly effective. Almost all
regulation, drugs/speeding/etc, is designed to increase the cost to the point
were “most” individuals are discouraged. While VPNs can be used to bypass
China’s Great Firewall the added friction is enough to keep most
Regardless of the possible gain from “solving” peering.
You are talking about renegotiating thousands of individual
agreements between hundreds of individual organizations,
all while everyone is in lockdown.
or
You ask a handful of companies to make changes to their own systems.
Good luck
Just in case someone has, or finds, historic BGP data sitting,
CAIDA would be willing to host it.
> On May 6, 2019, at 8:15 PM, Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 06, 2019 at 01:47:24PM -0600, John Osmon wrote:
>> I've got a need to look for some announcements from the mid 1990s.
>> The
> On Nov 28, 2018, at 12:03 PM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
>
> I would like to know if there is a way to see a transit provider's ASN ,let's
> say AS1 , and how AS1 is connecting to top 10 networks with amount of
> prefixes announced in Australia. is this something you are working on ?
We are
Bill is correct. AS Rank’s ranks by customer cone, not peers. Although you can
get an ASN’s list of peers. We are currently working on adding country level
ranking to AS Rank, but will not have it ready until next year.
Bradley
> On Nov 28, 2018, at 10:40 AM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>> On Nov
Hi William,
We don’t have the number sitting around, but you can get a pretty good feel by
clicking
through a few of the ark monitors
(http://www.caida.org/projects/ark/locations). Click on “data”
to the right of each monitor.
Bradley
On Nov 22, 2018, at 7:55 AM, William Herrin wrote:
>
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 09:24:18AM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
> Nowadays, I'm hearing this less and less, but it's not completely gone.
Putting aside the question of their importance, there is a small number
of ISPs that do no pay for transit. If you don't call them Tier 1, what
do you call them?
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 02:45:09PM -0700, Matthew Petach wrote:
Hitting 93% accuracy is actually pretty mindblowing
from my perspective, given how random some of
the naming choices are. ^_^;
This is the number of times we think we have an answer and it is wrong.
It does not include the
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:07:05PM +0100, Ben wrote:
Dear Bradley,
So basically you're asking others to do your homework for you ? ;-)
Actually no, I'm asking people to do something which I can not.
While it is true I could test against a manual inference, I would simply
be checking one
We are currently working on an algorithm that automatically detects
geographic hints inside of hostnames. At this point we are seeking
operators who can validate some of our inferences. Please contact me
if you can valid one of the inferences below or can provide us with one
we have missed.
LACNIC http://lacnic.net/en/index.html
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:24:54PM -0400, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
If I want to get a block of IP's issued for a network within Mexico who do I
talk with? I have been told arin does not cover Mexico. It was my
understand arin covers North America.
CAIDA plans to conduct a comparison of geolcocation tools for
determining the location of Internet Protocal (IP) address (and other
identifiers) in the summer of 2010.
At this time we wish to receive feedback from interested parties
on input to the comparison survey, whether they wish to
by Vince
Fuller in his presentation in March 2007, is there any newer or alternative
figures out?
Thanks
Bradley
--
Bradley HuffakerWe have all drunk from a well we did not dig
CAIDA/SDSC/UCSD - Mark Shields
14 matches
Mail list logo
