On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 02:46:59PM -0500, Allen McKinley Kitchen (gmail) wrote:
> Or has NANOG also succumbed to a signed-integer date problem?
>
> Waiting to see what I get back..
Don't jinx it...
> ..Allen
--
Brian Reichert
BSD admin/developer at large
nswer:
https://tcpreplay.appneta.com/
https://github.com/appneta/tcpreplay
etc...
I've tried none of them.
> How is this accomplished? partial rewriting IP headers
>
> Recommended tools?
>
> Mike
--
Brian Reichert
BSD admin/developer at large
=CyvQ5Pu_k1o
>
> ???Chris
--
Brian Reichert
BSD admin/developer at large
easy to walk around, to passively get a feel for Wifi
placement/config.
> Thanks!
--
Brian Reichert <reich...@numachi.com>
BSD admin/developer at large
that Binge on "violates key net neutrality
principles" and "is likely to violate the FCC's general conduct
rule."
--
Brian Reichert <reich...@numachi.com>
BSD admin/developer at large
there?
--
Brian Reichert <reich...@numachi.com>
BSD admin/developer at large
s,
sometimes, I successfully get results.
Other domains, such as NUMACHI.COM, I get the error I reported.
CLI-based versions of whois work just fine for all domains I'm
concerned about; it's that web-baed version that is selectively
failing.
> Best regards,
> David S
s://twitter.com/WhoisNet :(
Thanks for the suggestion. :)
> ~Marcin
--
Brian Reichert <reich...@numachi.com>
BSD admin/developer at large
.
4G is a whole different thing, but the talk was educational, nonetheless...
--
Phil Fagan
Denver, CO
970-480-7618
--
Brian Reichert reich...@numachi.com
BSD admin/developer at large
haven't found an implementation of getaddrinfo(3) that rejects
rooted domain names as non-legal.
Looking for couter-examples...
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
--
Brian Reichert
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 09:49:19AM -0500, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Brian Reichert reich...@numachi.com
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:10:20AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
[I believe this is Brian, then Mark: ]
When I did my initial development with OpenSSL, I
RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274
--
Brian Reichert reich...@numachi.com
BSD admin/developer at large
647 1274
--
Brian Reichert reich...@numachi.com
BSD admin/developer at large
of
useful suggestions, and I thank this forum for all of the suggestions
and feedback.
I later mentioned why I was pursuing the terminology (use case
surrounding entries in a SAN), and there's some effort to consider
whether or not my issue is really a non-issue.
Which it might be.
Doug
--
Brian
, RFC 2396 (circa 1998) seems to allow for it,
if I read the ABNF for 'hostname' right in section 3.2.2.
But that's the only place I see it.
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
--
Brian Reichert
. And I
was seeking guidance. :)
I do appreciate the feedback provided thus far.
Regards, K.
--
~~~
Karl Auer (ka...@biplane.com.au)
http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer
http://www.biplane.com.au/blog
--
Brian Reichert
The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274
--
Brian Reichert reich...@numachi.com
BSD admin/developer at large
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 05:21:02PM -0500, Jay Ashworth wrote:
In short, yes, Jay, I do. Got it. :-)
:)
You saw Joe's second reply?
Apparently, I lost track of that while writing this up. :)
--
Brian Reichert reich...@numachi.com
BSD admin/developer at large
convention. I think I would argue 'Yes', as to remove
ambiguity, but that naively makes a lot of legacy software trip in
unexpected ways.
As for the second question, I generally disapprove of throwing away
information, so I say No.
Clearly I like to make trouble for myself. :)
--
Brian Reichert
that trips over a rooted domain name.
(Yes, I'm aware an alternate bit of terminology has been proposed,
but I'm trying to be consistent for the duration of this thread.)
Still, I'm not arguing about what should be allowed; I'm trying to
come up with the words to explain to end-users.
--
Brian
results; I'm separately trying to
track down why that's occuring...
--
Brian Reichert reich...@numachi.com
BSD admin/developer at large
are idiots.
I, for one, never use a corporate account to access mailing lists.
My career has spanned many jobs, and I prefer to have a contiguous
footprint that _I_ control...
R's,
John
--
Brian Reichert reich...@numachi.com
BSD admin/developer at large
generating glue records?
- Why is this explicit step neccessary for some registrars, but not
others?
I'd appreciate any advice...
--
Brian Reichert reich...@numachi.com
BSD admin/developer at large
Healthcare
(303) 467-4671
matlo...@exempla.org
--
Brian Reichert reich...@numachi.com
55 Crystal Ave. #286
Derry NH 03038-1725 USA BSD admin/developer at large
was significantly extended by IEEE 802.3ab, which specified the
protocol for gigabit Ethernet, making autonegotiation mandatory for
1000BASE-T gigabit Ethernet over copper.
Note the 'mandatory'...
--
Brian Reichert reich...@numachi.com
55 Crystal Ave. #286
25 matches
Mail list logo
