> On Jul 15, 2022, at 9:07 AM, Casey Deccio wrote:
>
>> On Jul 15, 2022, at 8:25 AM, J. Hellenthal wrote:
>>
>> For a quick cursory overview of this project, I would urge you to add an
>> adendum or change the following line in the installation documentation
> On Jul 15, 2022, at 8:25 AM, J. Hellenthal wrote:
>
> For a quick cursory overview of this project, I would urge you to add an
> adendum or change the following line in the installation documentation...
>
> "%sudo ALL=(ALL:ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL"
>
> This is technically influencing bad
Dear colleagues,
I've been developing a tool for building and experimenting with virtual
networks, primarily for use with teaching network protocols. It's an active
work-in-progress, but I thought it might be time to reach out to NANOG in case
anyone else might find it useful and/or might
help!
Sincerely,
Casey Deccio
ICANN Name Collisions Analysis Project
be grateful for your input!
https://forms.gle/ntvsn6eqzYH9YcTN6
Your responses will remain anonymous, and any personal information will be
discarded after the research has concluded.
If you have any questions, please reply to this email.
Thank you for your help!
Sincerely,
Casey Deccio
ICANN Name
heers,
Casey
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 11:53 AM Casey Deccio <mailto:ca...@deccio.net>> wrote:
> Hi Bryan,
>
> > On Oct 14, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Bryan Holloway > <mailto:br...@shout.net>> wrote:
> >
> > I too would like to know
Hi Bryan,
> On Oct 14, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Bryan Holloway wrote:
>
> I too would like to know more about their methodology
We've written up our methodology and results in a paper that will be available
in a few weeks. Happy to post it here if folks are interested. Obviously, no
networks are
> On Oct 13, 2020, at 8:49 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Eric Kuhnke said:
>> Considering that one can run an instance of an anycasted recursive
>> nameserver, under heavy load for a very large number of clients, on a $600
>> 1U server these days... I wonder what exactly the
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Livingood, Jason
jason_living...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
Any DNS admins for HBO here? Your FQDN for order.hbonow.com looks a
little messed up.
http://dnsviz.net/d/order.hbonow.com/VP5DKQ/dnssec/
Looks like the DS records for hbonow.com have been pulled, so
Hi all,
I'm looking for a Microsoft mail contact, specifically for MTAs in
2a01:111:f400::/48 address space. Please contact me off-list.
Thanks,
Casey
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.fr wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 09:04:44AM -0600,
Josh Galvez j...@zevlag.com wrote
a message of 135 lines which said:
DNSSEC seems to be validating properly.
Since Google Public DNS returns SERVFAIL even with the +cd
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Yunhong Gu g...@google.com wrote:
Google resolvers got no response (i.e. timeout) for ipp.gov/dnskey from its
authoritative name servers. If there is anyone on this list who manages
ipp.gov DNS servers, please take a look. Our resolver IPs can be found at
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com wrote:
That's all well and good, but I certainly wouldn't expect nslookup
gmail.com or for nslookup google.com to return SERVFAIL
If you set the CD (checking disabled) in the request, a response that
would normally be
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.comwrote:
Could someone from Google contact me off list to discuss the public
resolvers?
I'm getting NXDOMAIN and then a proper response literally one second later.
And from there it's just 20 GOTO 10...the resolver seems
I'm seeing sporadic IPv6 connectivity issues to forums.comcast.com:
casey@rome$ curl -I6 forums.comcast.com
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:48:37 GMT
[snip...]
casey@rome$ curl -I6 forums.comcast.com
curl: (7) couldn't connect to host
casey@rome:~$ traceroute6 forums.comcast.com
15 matches
Mail list logo
