Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
Is the spam SMTP meant to be originating from the McColo ranges or is it
being used to control other machines elsewhere?
On the spam front, it's mostly command and control connections inbound
from infected machines to McColo-based controllers. Hence, unless you
can
John Bambenek wrote:
Something to keep in mind. I don't believe it was McColo that was the
end provider of badware per se (and I could be proven wrong), they
simply played the enabling role by hosting it and looked the other way.
Now don't get me wrong, they ought to be kicked offline for
Randy Bush wrote:
Randy Bush wrote:
Andrey Gordon wrote:
I'm getting bombarded by these
Received: from 80.224.33.155.static.user.ono.com ([80.224.33.155])by
mxb2eqsj.ultradns.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43)id 1J7YZc-0007qU-4ifor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 26 Dec 2007 15:53:36 +
3 matches
Mail list logo
