I can confirm, it was indeed Verisign who emailed me with the same message.
I am slightly disappointed by this course of action, needless to say I am
not surprised, because this kind of behavior is
expected from sales people.
I had a bit more respect for them, however...
-ck
On Tue, Jun 7,
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Andrew Matthews exstat...@gmail.comwrote:
Can someone with the box.net engineering group email me off list.
I have a peering issue with you guys at any2 in socal.
One would think, if you are interconnecting with another network you should
have some contact
stop
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:34 PM, andrew.wallace
andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Anyone having issue with Facebook?
Andrew
http://markmail.org/message/7vm3wk6kcnkqvonj
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Charles Gucker cguc...@onesc.net wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Chadwick Sorrell mirot...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I'm sending a new MAINT-AS object to the db-ad...@altdb.net, but it
doesn't appear to
my guess is the info for that was pulled off comcast's route server, where
only tata is seen
BGP routing table entry for 98.137.128.0/19, version 681406320
Paths: (8 available, best #8, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Not advertised to any peer
6453 10310 36752 36752, (received used)
in x/y, x= preference, y= metric
am= adjacency module, *= best unicast route
a better place to have asked this would be c-nsp
hth
-ck
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Colby Glass colbycciest...@gmail.comwrote:
We're seeing an AD of 2 on some routes on our Nexus 7k. I can't find
anything
+1
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 12:57 AM, Zaid Ali z...@zaidali.com wrote:
I think the Outages mailing list is more appropriate for this.
On 10/5/10 9:46 PM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Same here in SF Bay Area
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:44 PM, James Smith
i believe john curran just posted the follow up to the list yesterday on
this matter
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.netwrote:
On Dec 11, 2009, at 1:35 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
As always, good research by renesys.
What happens when an ASN is requested, and
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Steve Rubin s...@tch.org wrote:
ALTDB is free and you get what you pay for.
However. Donations to http://www.nanog.org/scholarships/abha.php would
probably get requests done a lot faster.
--
Steve Rubin/ AE6CH / http://www.altdb.net/
Monterey Highway I think
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone know where the actual cut is?
On 4/9/09, David W. Hankins david_hank...@isc.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 08:14:15AM -0700, Craig Holland wrote:
Just dropping a note that there is a
oh and heres the vid so you can see the demos
http://www.shmoocon.org/2009/videos/AllYourPackets-Rey.m4v
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Christian Koch christ...@automatick.netwrote:
They presented on the same topic at shmoocon, not sure if the info is any
more updated for BH EUROPE
nice article on bitgravity blog regarding the cuts..
http://sandbox.bitgravity.com/blog/2009/04/09/destroy-the-internet-with-a-hacksaw/
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Charles Wyble char...@thewybles.comwrote:
Ravi Pina wrote:
News coverage:
http://cow.org/r/?5459
a private asn in (parentheses) indicates a bgp confederation, i would
tend to think that there is some sort of mis-config or software bug in
one of the routers in that path thats leaking it
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Jason Lewis jle...@packetnexus.com wrote:
I was under the impression that
you can easily configure syslog-ng for forwarding/relaying syslog msgs
to another box
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Sam Stickland
sam_mailingli...@spacething.org wrote:
Hi,
It's looking like running all of our traps and syslog through a couple of
relay devices (and then onwards to the
snip
] part of the experiment is to measure the difference between the amount
] of nanog mail lorenzo drew in 2005 by pre-announcing with the amount we
] get in 2009 while not pre-announcing. :)
This statement is an admission that he set out to annoy people,
annoy them enough they would
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Rich Kulawiec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose what I'm saying here is that the presence of this traffic on
the nanog list isn't the problem per se -- it's a symptom of the problem.
---Rsk
This makes sense, and i totally agree that is more a symptom...
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Gadi Evron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with both you and Mr. Koch.
It is currently specifically defined as not for NANOG, so there is no
interpretation. However, I also agree that it is a symptom, and times
chnage.. Operators who are not in specific closed
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Michael K. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Christian:
I guess I disagree 'somewhat'. Not to long ago we had a long thread about
someone trying to configure their modem that was deemed appropriate to the
list. How can that be more appropriate that trying
[replying to self]
A good example just hit NANOG. Mark, who is by no means unclued or lazy,
asked for help contacting email admins. Now, obviously he has done all he
can to contact them on his own (I assume this being obvious and true).
There is no question this is operational for him, nor
Sounds ridiculous...radb mirrors arins db, I don't see why they are
trying to force you to use radb.
You can query whois.radb.net and you will be able to see your arin objects...
Did they give you a reason on WHY you should have to use RADB?
Christian
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Craig
Ahah, so my first theory was on the right track :)
Thanks for sharing the info...
Christian
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 2:33 AM, Andree Toonk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
.-- My secret spy satellite informs me that at Tue, 23 Sep 2008, Hank
Nussbacher wrote:
I too spotted this via PHAS for
I received a phas notification about this today as well...
I couldn't find any relevant data confirming the announcement of one
of my /19 blocks, until a few minutes ago when i checked the route
views bgplay (ripe bgplay turns up nothing) and can now see 8997
announcing and quickly withdrawing my
: ---
From: Christian Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I couldn't find any relevant data confirming the announcement of one
of my /19 blocks, until a few minutes ago when i checked the route
views bgplay (ripe bgplay turns up nothing) and can now see 8997
announcing and quickly withdrawing my prefix
prefixes in PHAS and BGPPlay, I too see my
prefixes being advertised by 8997 for a short time. It looks like it
happened around 1222091563 according to PHAS.
Was this a mistake or something else?
Justin
Christian Koch wrote:
I received a phas notification about this today as well...
I
Bgplay on routeviews, not the ripe one :)
Christian
On 9/23/08, Hank Nussbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Christian Koch wrote:
Strange that RIPE RIS search doesn't show it:
http://www.ris.ripe.net/perl-risapp/risearch.html
but yet you say BGPlay does show it.
-Hank
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Christopher Morrow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Gadi Evron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Skywing wrote:
Putting things in the automated bogon feeds (e.g. Team Cymru) that are not
strictly bogons (unallocated
I dont mind, i think it is another good step towards 'good filtering'
but...i think the PITA part is
downstream 'clueless' customers, who may need an explanation on prefix
hijacking and the state
of the internet today, and that these are all just combined efforts to
minimize the risk of accepting
good point... :)
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Jon Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Christian Koch wrote:
I dont mind, i think it is another good step towards 'good filtering'
but...i think the PITA part is
downstream 'clueless' customers, who may need an explanation
I've been using IAR and PHAS, but I've noticed IAR seems to work a
bit better and much faster. Recently we changed our ASN, and seconds
after we started announcing prefixes under thew new ASN I received the
email alerts from IAR. I did not receive anything from PHAS. Although
I have in the past,
looks to me as if they are just using output of 'top' and displaying
it there as it were for network stats.
output of top from one of my boxes..
top - 11:39:48 up 3 days, 20:56, 3 users, load average: 0.07, 0.21, 0.16
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Bill Woodcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Anton Kapela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anton's post that GX is still providing them transit is a bit curious, since
I was under the impression GX had severed all ties with Atrivo. But
you might want to check the obvious first :)
http://www.tunnelbroker.net/forums/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Colin Alston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone from Hurricane Electric/TunnelBroker.net here?
what do mpls, ipsec tunnels, ssl have anything to do with someone
announcing your address space and hijacking youre prefixes??
i think we all know this is not new.. and these guys didnt claim it to
be.. they're not presenting this to a 'xNOG' crowd, defcon has a
different type of audience..im not
a lot of providers have their bgp/routing policy published somewhere
online/in their community guide
for instance, you can find L3's policy in their irr objects ( whois -h
whois.radb.net as3356)
there are also plenty of community guides available here -
http://www.onesc.net/communities/
http://www.renesys.com/blog/2008/03/you_cant_get_there_from_here_1.shtml
http://www.renesys.com/blog/2008/03/he_said_she_said_cogent_vs_tel.shtml
http://www.renesys.com/blog/2008/03/telia_and_cogent_kiss_and_make_1.shtml
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:24 AM, William Waites [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
matasano blogged about it
cache of the original post here..
http://beezari.livejournal.com/
matasano apologizes here
http://www.matasano.com/log/1105/regarding-the-post-on-chargen-earlier-today/
dan posts (13 - 0) 13 days left to blackhat opposed to the 0 days since the
details were discussed
interestingly, before july 7th these prefixes were originating from another
private as - 65501, until sometime that day routes were withdrawn from 65501
and began being announced from 54271...
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Joel Jaeggli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Morris wrote:
surely the tool is not focused at a dns operator/admin audience..
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Owen DeLong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The tool, unfortunately, only goes after the server it thinks you are using
to
recurse from the client where you're running your browser.
This makes it
agreed. i see the most benefit from these boxes geared towards networks with
critical apps that are latency intensive and more than a handful of transit
providers than i do for a smaller provider..
depending on how many upstreams you're juggling, its not that hard to create
some traffic
money on highly skilled engineers? maybe i am just
thinking inside the box at the moment, from an engineers view..if so my
apologies for steering off course
-christian
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Eric Van Tol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Christian Koch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
anyone with firsthand operational experience with this? pro's, con's?
feedback?
ck
41 matches
Mail list logo
