Verizon business internet contact needed

Hey all, if any Verizon engineer could hit me up offline about a ticket we've had, it would be appreciated. We've got a site in Illinois that has a new circuit, works well to Verizon speedtest, but poor elsewhere, including our SD-WAN destinations. I'm curious if UDP/2426 gets any unusual

RE: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question

y, the 23" extension ears from Cisco are serious and my router chassis' don't sag. Mark On 4/27/2023 10:04 AM, Chris Marget wrote: On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 9:53 AM Chuck Church mailto:chuckchu...@gmail.com> > wrote: for a Cisco ASA1001, there aren’t rails, but rather front and

Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question

Hey all. Question about standard 4 post racks. We bought some that are adjustable. Unfortunately, the posts are very flimsy, as these are some fancy cabinets with spacing on the sides for vertical patch panels, etc. We found that 2 post mounting of most Cisco devices (namely Cat 9500 1RU

Cogent help needed

Can anyone from Cogent hit me up off-list? Having an issue in South America getting packets to our site in Brazil. Traceroute shows route though a Cogent router, then RFC1918 replies. So not sure if problem is Cogent or a peer of theirs. Two hosts in the 177.10.168.124/30 are acting

Google location question

NANOG, Sorry if this is the wrong forum, but I figured we could all use a distraction from IPV4 expansion for a bit. We're facing a problem with corporate use of browsers and google location services. Our users across North and South America seem to be getting location info

Google Nest camera contact request

If anyone has access to a Google Nest engineer could you pass their info to me offline? Going through tech support didn't get me anywhere. We're seeing that their cameras and the cloud servers they home back to (oculus-xxx.dropcam.com) are using TLS 1.0 and no server name in the certs, which our

RE: Wildfires: Reminder smart devices don't include emergency warnings while streaming

Isn’t this a better topic for CNet as opposed to NANOG? Chuck From: NANOG On Behalf Of ITechGeek Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 4:12 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Wildfires: Reminder smart devices don't include emergency warnings while streaming At least cell phones have a

Re: An appeal for more bandwidth to the Internet Archive

You mean not everyone still looks up the classifications on mulletsgalore.com? Chuck On Wed, May 13, 2020, 7:54 PM Valdis Klētnieks wrote: > On Wed, 13 May 2020 10:40:36 +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko said: > > What about introducing some cache offloading, like CDN doing? (Google, > > Facebook,

Re: California public safety power shutdowns

Isn't this a topic for an outage list? Or a power grid list? Chuck On Wed, Oct 9, 2019, 5:28 PM Sean Donelan wrote: > On Wed, 9 Oct 2019, William Herrin wrote: > > Wasn't California in a similar mess 20 years ago when government > regulation > > at the time also put PG in the position that

RE: Routing issues to AWS environment.

Are you sure the problem isn’t NTT? My buddy’s WISP peers with Spirit and had a boatload of problems with random packet loss affecting initially just SIP and RTP (both UDP). Spirit was blaming NTT. Problems went away when Spirit stopped peering with NTT yesterday. Path is through Telia now

Re: Stupid Question maybe?

When I first started working with Cisco products (around 1999) I came upon a router doing NAT for internet access that used a discontiguous mask to determine which address to PAT the hosts against as they were doing some creative load balancing. It worked really well, no matter what part of the

RE: Cheap switch with a couple 100G

Under 1K for 48 10G ports? Are you missing a decimal place? Chuck -Original Message- From: NANOG On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2018 9:39 AM To: 'North American Network Operators' Group' Subject: Cheap switch with a couple 100G I keep hearing how cheap 100G is

RE: Anyone else having Tunnelbroker.net issues?

I've had problems with my Synology router and tunnel broker for several days. Used to work, config didn't change, assigned IPv4 address for me didn't change, but acting flakey, not much debugging capability on Synology I can find to figure it out. Chuck -Original Message- From: NANOG

RE: Any experience with Broadcom ICOS out there?

I smell some BS here, at least in their 'Verified Purchase' reviews: "It is installed as a network hub in my basement and it is working fine. Great quality product. I've had a lot of business with FS for years. This is a very reliable company and they stand behind their company's products with

RE: Waste will kill ipv6 too

-Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ricky Beam Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 9:55 PM To: Owen DeLong Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too >Every scenario everyone has come up with is

RE: Purchased IPv4 Woes

Maybe a silly idea, but shouldn't the sale of a block of addresses (RIR ownership change) trigger a removal of that block from all reputation list databases? If I buy a car from a police auction, I'm fairly sure the FBI doesn't start tailing me, because the car was once used for less than

RE: Someone didn't get the leap second memo...

That bug note indicates all 3.13.* are vulnerable to this, but our 3.13.3 lab router seemed ok, no reload. Logged: Dec 31 23:59:59: %IOSXE-5-PLATFORM: R0/0: kernel: Clock: inserting leap second 23:59:60 UTC But the release notes seem to indicate that bugs: CSCut82336 ASR1002-X: Handle

RE: IX in Iran by TIC

Foul language is frowned upon. https://www.nanog.org/list Chuck -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of James Bensley Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 4:24 AM To: nanog Subject: Re: IX in Iran by TIC On 12 July 2016 at 14:36, Bevan

RE: Netflix banning HE tunnels

. Chuck -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Scott Weeks Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 5:55 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Netflix banning HE tunnels --- chuckchu...@gmail.com wrote: From: "Chuck Church" <chuckchu...@gmail.com> Th

RE: Netflix banning HE tunnels

-Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Elvis Daniel Velea Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 6:36 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Netflix banning HE tunnels Netflix, YOU are the ones forcing people to turn IPv4 off... this is just insane. tens (if not

RE: Cost-effectivenesss of highly-accurate clocks for NTP

-Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Leo Bicknell Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 10:28 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Cost-effectivenesss of highly-accurate clocks for NTP >For a typical site, there are two distinct desires from the same NTP

RE: NIST NTP servers

-Original Message- >From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Leo Bicknell >Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 9:31 AM >To: nanog@nanog.org >Subject: Re: NIST NTP servers >Personally, my network gets NTP from 14 stratum 1 sources right now. >You, and the hacker, do not know

RE: NIST NTP servers

-Original Message- From: Gary E. Miller [mailto:g...@rellim.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 3:58 PM To: Chuck Church <chuckchu...@gmail.com> Cc: 'Majdi S. Abbas' <m...@latt.net>; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: NIST NTP servers Yo Chuck! On Tue, 10 May 2016 10:29:35 -0400 &

RE: NIST NTP servers

True, but I did mention verifying packet sources. That needs to happen everywhere, and it's not hard to do. Just getting everyone to do it is tough. Chuck -Original Message- From: Allan Liska [mailto:al...@allan.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2016 10:40 AM To: Chuck Church <chuck

RE: NIST NTP servers

-Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Majdi S. Abbas > So how does this stop from distributing time to their customers via NTP? > GPS doesn't save the protocol, in particular where the S1 clocks involved are embedded devices with rather

RE: BGP peering strategies for smaller routers

-- Hi Nick, >You missed the point. Sloppy memory management is a "canary in a coal mine." >It's a user-visible symptom that reflects poor code quality underneath. >Programmers who

RE: Oh dear, we've all been made redundant...

Uggghhh. I've always hated this 'reboot, see if it fixes it' methodology. If the CPEs can't recover from error conditions correctly, they shouldn't be used. I blame Microsoft for making this concept acceptable. LOL. Chuck -Original Message- From: NANOG

RE: Internet Exchanges supporting jumbo frames?

-Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Tim McKee >The factor of 6 was just in reduction of overhead. Granted in the greater scheme of things the overall 4% is relatively insignificant, but there have been many times when doing >multiple 10-100+GB

RE: Nat

-Original Message- From: Mark Andrews [mailto:ma...@isc.org] Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 7:46 PM To: Chuck Church <chuckchu...@gmail.com> Cc: 'Matthew Petach' <mpet...@netflight.com>; 'North American Network Operators' Group' <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Nat &g

RE: Nat

-Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Matt Palmer Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2015 10:29 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Nat >Depends on how many devices you have on it. Once you start filling your home with Internet of Unpatchable Security Holes

RE: Nat

-Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Petach Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 1:59 PM Cc: North American Network Operators' Group Subject: Re: Nat >I'm still waiting for the IETF to come around to allowing feature parity

RE: reliably detecting the presence of a bridge?

-Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Dave Taht Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 4:37 AM To: William Herrin Cc: NANOG Subject: Re: reliably detecting the presence of a bridge? The latter. In this case a routing

RE: DHCPv6 PD & Routing Questions

-Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of valdis.kletni...@vt.edu Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 11:47 AM To: Mark Andrews Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: DHCPv6 PD & Routing Questions >If you have a *workable* solution for the case

Fw: new message

Hey! New message, please read <http://accentbanking.com/mention.php?ypoz> Chuck Church

Fw: new message

Hey! New message, please read <http://mixmajor.com/reached.php?518zu> Chuck Church

Fw: new message

Hey! New message, please read <http://shophorseplay.com/does.php?7m1ds> Chuck Church

Fw: new message

Hey! New message, please read <http://sibzem.ru/woman.php?57> Chuck Church

RE: IP's with jitter/packet loss and very far away

Any hotel wi-fi around 7PM local time. Chuck On Sep 18, 2015, at 10:42 AM, Dovid Bender > wrote: Hi, I am working on a presentation and looking to create samples of what a trace should not look like? Anyone have IP's that I can trace from the

RE: NetFlow - path from Routers to Collector

Agree. Most OOB is lacking redundancy too, so a single failure can really take the shine off an OOB deployment. Especially when you've put your management traffic on it, including radius traffic, and you're using 802.1X. Found that out the hard way a few years ago. Chuck -Original

NANOG isn't for desktop OS licensing support, was: Windows 10 Release

I hate to be that guy, but this is getting really outside the scope of NANOG. Chuck -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Joe Greco Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 12:58 PM To: Scott Helms khe...@zcorum.com Cc: NANOG nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re:

IPv6 CPE best practices

So, I've been following this IPv6 discussion for a while now. Putting much more thought into it than ever before. What I've gathered so far: We need both SLAAC and DHPCv6 on CPE router to support all end clients. Android and some other platforms still have some issues with a v6-addressed DNS

RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion

-Original Message- From: John R. Levine [mailto:jo...@iecc.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 4:50 PM To: Chuck Church chuckchu...@gmail.com Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion This is IPv6. Why shouldn't they have their own PI space? Same way it happens

RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion

What about dual-homed customers? Or are they all expected to have their own PI space? Chuck -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mel Beckman Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 4:33 PM To: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu Cc: John Levine; nanog@nanog.org Subject:

RE: Possible Sudden Uptick in ASA DOS?

a criminal, even though you made their 'job' as easy as possible. Chuck -Original Message- From: Mark Andrews [mailto:ma...@isc.org] Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 10:06 PM To: Chuck Church Cc: 'Jared Mauch'; 'Colin Johnston'; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Possible Sudden Uptick in ASA DOS

RE: Possible Sudden Uptick in ASA DOS?

-Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Jared Mauch Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 9:08 AM To: Colin Johnston Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Possible Sudden Uptick in ASA DOS? My guess is a researcher. I wouldn't classify someone sending known

RE: How long will it take to completely get rid of IPv4 or will it happen at all?

IPX with EIGRP or NLSP wasn't bad over the WAN. Can't help you with TokenRing though. Chuck -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Randy Bush Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2015 8:14 PM To: Bacon Zombie Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: How long will it

RE: Anycast provider for SMTP?

Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ray Soucy Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 3:14 PM To: Joe Hamelin Cc: NANOG list Subject: Re: Anycast provider for SMTP? As such, you typically only see it leveraged for simple services (e.g. DNS, NTP). I've

Unified Layer contact

Anyone on here from Unified Layer? Having an issue with a small ISP I help out occasionally. Some of their IP Space can reach a hosted web server, but their other prefixes cannot reach the destination. Traceroute from working IP space to destination web server (a bank) : 15

Akamai minimum prefix length issue

Anyone from Akamai (or who might know), Having an issue with AS 20940 either not seeing or ignoring a /23 we're announcing, and following a /22 to another path. Other ISPs our upstream peers with see the /23. I didn't see a looking glass for Akamai to verify. Anyone from Akamai able to

RE: Thousands of hosts on a gigabit LAN, maybe not

Sounds interesting. I wouldn't do more than a /23 (assuming IPv4) per subnet. Join them all together with a fast L3 switch. I'm still trying to visualize what several thousand tiny computers in a single rack might look like. Other than a cabling nightmare. 1000 RJ-45 switch ports is a good

RE: dns on fios/frontier

Sounds like you're talking to my dad. Tell him I said hi. Chuck -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Randy Bush Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 2:45 PM To: Christopher Morrow Cc: North American Network Operators' Group Subject: Re: dns on

RE: macomnet weird dns record

Comic Book Guy would probably declare: Worst Naming Convention Ever Chuck -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Colin Johnston Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 9:27 AM To: Nikolay Shopik Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: macomnet weird dns record

RE: Last-call DoS/DoS Attack BCOP

Other phrases can be substituted. no guts, no glory go big or go home no pain, no pain Chuck -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Scott Weeks Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 1:41 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Last-call DoS/DoS Attack BCOP

RE: NDS Resolution Problems between Charter Communications and OpenDNS

NDS? My first suggestion would be run DSREPAIR. Wow, that brings back memories. But since you probably mean DNS, I'll stop right there. Chuck -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Dye Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 1:20 PM To:

RE: symmetric vs. asymmetric [was: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality]

Since this has turned into a discussion on upload vs download speed, figured I'd throw in a point I haven't really brought up. For the most part, uploading isn't really a time-sensitive activity to the general (as in 99% of the ) public. Uploading a bunch of facebook photos, you hit

RE: .mil postmaster Contacts?

-Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Alain Hebert Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 9:14 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: .mil postmaster Contacts? Might be related to the news (CNN this morning) about the WH network being exploited for a few

RE: .mil postmaster Contacts?

You sure it's not a DNS issue? I've had problems resolving various *.disa.mil sites today. Google DNS claims they don't exist. Chuck -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ray Van Dolson Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 1:52 PM To: nanog@nanog.org

RE: Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS Software SSL VPN Denial of Service Vulnerability

Given that probably 80+% (a guess, but I'd be really surprised at a lower figure) of all internet traffic crosses at least one Cisco device somewhere, I think it would be a huge disservice to discontinue sending these emails. 10 to 15 emails per year isn't much overhead, compared to seemingly

RE: Managing IOS Configuration Snippets

Along those same lines, we've been using alias exec for the same thing for a while: Alias exec NTP 6500_NTP_V1.0.1 Alias exec bgp 6500_peer_V2.0.0 Thanks, Chuck -Original Message- From: Tim Durack [mailto:tdur...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 11:50 AM To: Ryan Shea

RE: Sudan disconnected from the Internet

Or the country as a whole had WAY too many iPhones in need of a 7.0 upgrade. Chuck -Original Message- From: Keith Medcalf [mailto:kmedc...@dessus.com] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 7:23 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Sudan disconnected from the Internet Of course it is

RE: management traffic QoS on Tunnel interfaces

Newer IOS support setting precedence or DSCP for outbound SSH: ip ssh prec 2 Thanks, Chuck -Original Message- From: Andrey Khomyakov [mailto:khomyakov.and...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 12:07 PM To: Nanog Subject: management traffic QoS on Tunnel interfaces Hi all, I have

RADB entry

Anyone, Hopefully this is a simple question about RADB. I'm supporting a small wireless ISP, they just recently added a second upstream connection - Charter (AS 20115). The IP space was originally issued by the other upstream Windstream (AS 7029). Looking at a few resources

RE: RADB entry

-Original Message- From: Eric Krichbaum [mailto:e...@telic.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 8:31 AM To: 'Chuck Church'; nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: RADB entry While not 100% accurate, it is very common. The origin being entered by a provider as their own allows them to add

RE: NTP Issues Today

-Original Message- From: Jimmy Hess [mailto:mysi...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 7:50 PM To: Van Wolfe Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: NTP Issues Today This _should_ have caused NTP to execute a panic shutdown, instead of setting the clock back 30 million seconds. --

RE: Network scan tool/appliance horror stories

Network scan tools are a great way to verify what important protocols you left out of your control plane policing non-default policies. Had a scanner totally clog up our 6500 core router DHCP relay (ip helper) function once. Uggghhh, security people Chuck

RE: RFC becomes Visio

I agree. Perhaps the ISP goes a little above and beyond most, and will provide configuration assistance to the downstream if they have issues. Useful info they might want to see on the diagram could be your AS (duh), ASes downstream from you, are you multihomed, and with who, what prefixes and or

RE: Another LTE network turns up as IPv4-only squat space + NAT

I disagree. I see it as an extra layer of security. If DOD had a network with address space 'X', obviously it's not advertised to the outside. It never interacts with public network. Having it duplicated on the outside world adds an extra layer of complexity to a hacker trying to access it.

RE: IPv6 /64 links (was Re: ipv6 book recommendations?)

Does anyone know the reason /64 was proposed as the size for all L2 domains? I've looked for this answer before, never found a good one. I thought I read there are some L2 technologies that use a 64 bit hardware address, might have been Bluetooth. Guaranteeing that ALL possible hosts could live

RE: last mile, regulatory incentives, etc (was: att fiber, et al)

-Original Message- From: david peahi [mailto:davidpe...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 1:54 PM To: Jared Mauch Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: last mile, regulatory incentives, etc (was: att fiber, et al) I have discovered that the Federal School Lunch E-Rate program has built

RE: Hijacked Network Ranges

Shouldn't a forged LOA be justification to contact law enforcement? Chuck -Original Message- From: Kelvin Williams [mailto:kwilli...@altuscgi.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:01 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Hijacked Network Ranges Greetings all. We've been in a 12+ hour

RE: Arguing against using public IP space

-Original Message- From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu [mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu] Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 9:17 AM To: Leigh Porter Cc: nanog@nanog.org; McCall, Gabriel Subject: Re: Arguing against using public IP space And this is totally overlooking the fact that the vast

RE: Arguing against using public IP space

When you all say NAT, are you implying PAT as well? 1 to 1 NAT really provides no security. But with PAT, different story. Are there poor implementations of PAT that don't enforce an exact port/address match for the translation table? If the translation table isn't at fault, are the 'helpers'

RE: Arguing against using public IP space

-Original Message- From: Phil Regnauld [mailto:regna...@nsrc.org] PAT (overload) will have ports open listening for return traffic, on the external IP that's being overloaded. What happens if you initiate traffic directed at the RFC1918 network itself, and send that to

RE: Internet mauled by bears

Can we take this offline? I don't believe livestock behavior patterns have much operational content. Thanks, Chuck -Original Message- From: Jason Baugher [mailto:ja...@thebaughers.com] Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 11:31 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Internet mauled by

RE: ouch..

-Original Message- From: Erik Bais [mailto:eb...@a2b-internet.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 7:56 AM To: 'Frank Habicht'; nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: ouch.. Personally I think this is a pathetic action from Cisco, however I'm not surprised by them doing it ... Regards, Erik

RE: vyatta for bgp

Original Message- From: Dobbins, Roland [mailto:rdobb...@arbor.net] Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 2:56 PM To: North American Network Operators' Group Subject: Re: vyatta for bgp zorched. --- Zorch. I like that.