That system by the way is annoying when your mobile network operator are so
oversubscribed/old-fashioned that I had to wait over 6 months before I
could update to Android ICS... I really don't want my ability to update the
software on my phone to be controlled by a teleco, and these large teleco's
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Gregory Croft gcr...@shoremortgage.com wrote:
Does anyone have any experience with using firewalls as edge devices
when BGP is concerned?
Doing so very successfully with Fortigate devices.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Matthew Walster matt...@walster.org wrote:
On 23 June 2010 08:54, Colin Alston karna...@karnaugh.za.net wrote:
I dislike HP switches from a management point of view (and I think the
VLAN config is nonsense), but they work fine.
That's strange, I abhor
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Greg Whynott greg.whyn...@oicr.on.ca wrote:
1. Under heavy load (60% or more of 10Gbit interfaces at +80%) we have seen
_all_ interfaces simultaneously drop packets and generate interface errors.
this was on an early release of the firmware and I don't
Hi
Wondering if anyone has some contact with FTC or Nexband or whoever. I
can't find
Someone without clue has decided it's a good idea to make almost all
of 66.211.112.0/20 share the same PTR record. This has bad
consequences, and is beginning to irritate me.
[coffee ~]$ host 66.211.118.239
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com wrote:
It would be nice to know what those recommendations were...
Excuse the delayed reply from a SA person :)
I'm guessing the recommendations were not to use an asymmetrical service for
trying to upload large amounts of
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Ben Matthew ben.matt...@timlradio.co.ukwrote:
Anyway my company currently uses BIND for our DNS requirements (9.6.0).
I'm always pretty keen on updating, when advised to, in order to patch
vulnerabilities and so forth as we have a fairly popular website and
On 2009/05/29 09:48 AM Anton Zimm wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@bfk.de wrote:
* Anton Zimm:
I did see the info from additional section, but:
Afaik the additional section is not an answer, they're just additional
info, not an authorized answer from the
On 2009/05/26 10:46 PM Aaron Wendel wrote:
Last time I looked at my bill I was being billed by the kWh
P=V*I
On 2009/05/07 08:34 PM Raleigh Apple wrote:
Is anyone else out there aware that the UCEProtect Level 3 email
blacklist blocks entire AS?
Yes. We don't use them anymore.
Yahoo!グループからの重要なお知らせがメール下部にございます。ご確認ください。
---
On 2009/04/28 02:50 PM Blake Pfankuch wrote:
Yahoo!グループからの重要なお知らせがメール下部にございます。ご確認ください。
---
This idea pleases me. Beer. Oh tasty beer
And chicken wings? Please tell me there are chicken wings.
ヘルプページ： http://help.yahoo.co.jp/help/jp/groups/
On 2009/04/28 02:58 PM Steven Walker wrote:
Sorry about that NANOG. I though it was more junk from the HK spammers.
Don't NANOG people have far better ways to deal with spammers than
yelling at them?
I've reported spam to this AS before, and I don't recall ever getting
a response.
I'm wondering how many others see spam from it? Is it worth while
continuing or should I just stop accepting SMTP from there?
They seem to have some dubious customers hosted on there, a large
amount seems to
On 2009/04/07 03:33 PM Chris Jackman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 11:53:07AM +0200, Colin Alston wrote:
I've reported spam to this AS before, and I don't recall ever getting a
response.
I'm wondering how many others see spam from it? Is it worth while
continuing or should I just stop
Deric Kwok wrote:
Hi All
Actually, what is the different hardware router VS linux router?
Have you had experience to compare real router eg: cisco VS linux router?
Archives have discussed this at extreme length.
The most interesting thing I saw come out of it was this
Mathias Wolkert wrote:
I'd like to know what software people are using to document networks.
Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me.
I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays.
Omnigrafle and Dia are all I can add to your list
On 2009/02/02 07:16 PM mikelie...@gmail.com wrote:
Some nitwits just grab one out of fat air.
I've seen 192.169.xx and 192.254.xx randomly used before.
Seen 198/8, 196.200/16 and 172.whatever the hell the admin felt like/16
And these people are shocked when I tell them to renumber before
On 2009/01/30 07:56 PM bert hubert wrote:
In general, the Linux packet shaping infrastructure is overly powerful, if
very weakly documented - despite the LARTC efforts.
Overly powerful is a strong word. Sure it has countless poorly
documented features, but then it fails at even the the most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jay Nugent wrote:
*EVERY* ISP I have consulted for has failed to perform the simplest of
Order Entry processes, including an item-by-item checklist of what to do
when a customer disconnects. At each ISP we have found numerous circuits
still
On 2009/01/05 10:47 PM Randy Bush wrote:
perhaps i am a bit slow. but could someone explain to me how trust in
dns data transfers to trust in an http partner and other uses to which
ssl is put?
I must also be slow. Can someone tell me how DNSSEC is supposed to
encrypt my TCP/IP traffic?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ingo Flaschberger wrote:
cons: only 1 route for each network, vrrp failover is not easy to
implement with quagga and ospf, no multipath routing
Anyone cares about VRRPD when you have Heartbeat?
Linux:
pros: more than 1 route for each network
On 2008/12/16 11:53 PM Joe Abley wrote:
On 2008-12-16, at 16:45, mike wrote:
I have a serious problem with postini applying some rules that look
like the work of a rouge engineer in their ranks, and I need an
internal contact to discuss the problem with.
What is it with those rouge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
Dave Blaine wrote:
There are at least three ways to address this Sprint / Cogent partition
I'd be fairly reluctant to allow the government to get involved in
peering relationships too deeply. Australia has some very
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rod Beck wrote:
I'll make one comment before 'Alex the Hammer' closes this discussion
for straying into politics.
Clearly regulating the incumbents to unbundle local loops has worked
very well in some European countries (France and possibly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I know NANOG hates these mails but they happen anyway.. I need someone
at Comcast who can help with why their server is detecting a host (that
is not blacklisted, senderbased or anything) as spam.
The URL Comcast gives with the spam block message
On 2008/10/17 06:19 AM Scott Doty wrote:
So please, if you have anything further to say, either email me
directly, or I suggest trying the nanog-futures list. Thank you.
Abandon all hope ye who enter this thread.
Hi all
I'm considering trying to come up with some means to automatically
detect a networks topology and draw pretty pictures. This is somewhat
boring though if a network isn't well arranged with VLANs and q-tag
trunk routers and so on (It will just look like a big cloud of junk
connected
On 2008/10/15 06:29 PM Bill Woodcock wrote:
InterMapper.
http://dartware.com/network_monitoring_products/intermapper/index.html
-Bill
Whoa, quite a serious looking piece of software. Will check it out.
Was kinda hoping to write my own software though,
On 2008/10/15 06:29 PM Colin Alston wrote:
Is there any kind of cunning trick to detect standard layer2 switches
along a path without stuff like STP?
Apparently there isn't. Lots of people mentioned other tools, the
problem there is they have one thing in common which is polling SNMP.
I
On 2008/10/15 08:49 PM Larry Sheldon wrote:
Colin Alston wrote:
Maybe there should be something (I mean like, someone should come up
with a standard :P) to trace switches in a path... Problem is I think
even then the simple devices won't bother to support it.
I have been away from it for ma
On 2008/10/02 05:25 AM Noel Butler wrote:
They wouldn't have the guts to post under their real name, remember, IRC
is for the gutless keyboard commandos...
What a stupid generalisation
Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
Or the highly likely scenario that the primary gateway accessible to the
survey tool is some load balanced SPAM filtering cluster, and not the
MTA in use as final delivery.
Good point, real MTA in front of Excange is extremely common..
Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jason Frisvold:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Scott Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nice to see a wholesale DNSSEC rollout underway (I must confess to being a
little surprised at the source, too!). Granted, it's a much more manageable
problem set than, say, .com
Tom Storey wrote:
Hi all.
I have several of these units deployed, they are all running fine, but I
am looking for information about them, specifically SNMP related.
Our Alcatel contacts have given us a collection of MIBs, from which I cant
really get anything useful out of the radios.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am being tasked to map a network. In the past I have used nmap to find the
systems on the local LAN and remote LANs (same enterprise).
This time I want to create a visual map of the LAN. With cheops, I
reasonably good results but cannot be documented for
Lamar Owen wrote:
Lack of a defense in a civil case will virtually guarantee a favorable
judgment for the plaintiff, however.
Networks (at least in most countries) are 100% private entities who can
de-peer whoever they want for whatever reason they want.
Is anyone from Hurricane Electric/TunnelBroker.net here?
On 2008/08/29 07:45 PM Christian Koch wrote:
you might want to check the obvious first :)
http://www.tunnelbroker.net/forums/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, problem was my prefix was routed wrong.. so trying to get to the
site was tedious and would have required turning off IPv6 only to turn
it on
kcc wrote:
I search google but couldn't get any solution
Can you send me information?
Sure!
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Robert D. Scott wrote:
The harder way:
Decimal: 1089055123
Hex (dashes inserted at octals): 40-E9-A9-93
Decimal (of each octet): 64-233-169-147
IP Address: 64.233.169.147
The Python way
import socket, struct
socket.inet_ntoa(struct.pack('l', 1089055123))
'64.233.169.147'
On 2008/08/27 05:22 PM Dave Israel wrote:
Normally, I don't participate in this sort of thing, but I'm a sucker
for a there's more than one way to do it challenge.
Aww come on, C gets way more fun than that ;)
#define _u8 unsigned char
#define _u32 unsigned long
int main(void) {
_u32
On 2008/08/27 07:07 PM Robert Kisteleki wrote:
(unsigned char)(((char*)i)[3]),
Ahh yes, I was trying to remember that pattern. I saw it in an
embedded device long ago :P
On 2008/08/13 10:04 PM Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
The italian courts seem to have told ISPs there to block ThePirateBay
(bittorrent tracker), and this evening (CET) LLNW (AS22822) originated
88.80.6.0/24 via 6762 (telecom italia) to what I presume is most of Europe.
Basically same thing that
Joe Greco wrote:
Unix machines set up by anyone with half a brain run a local caching
server, and use forwarders. IE, the nameserver process can establish a
persistent TCP connection to its trusted forwarders, if we just let it.
Organizations often choose not to do this because doing so
On 2008/07/28 09:05 PM Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
Is there any reason which I'm too far down the food chain to see why
that's not a fantastic idea? Or at least, something inspired by it?
If NS records pointed to IP's instead of names then this problem might
not exist.
The root holds glue going
On 2008/07/28 09:52 PM Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:35:30PM -0700, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
As you pointed out, the protocol, if properly implemented, addresses
this.
There should always be Glue (A records for the NS) in a delegation. RFC
1034 even specifies this:
4.2.2
On 2008/07/27 10:18 AM Randy Bush wrote:
the fact is that real 100m/100m is about USD30/mo in japan. in the
states, i pay about USD90 for 256k/768k. as far as the internet is
concerned, the united states is a third world country.
I currently pay (converted from ZAR to USD) $40/m for
to your message RE: Managed,
cheap,
DC power switches sent on 7/17/2008 8:58:08 AM.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is
away.
Who cares?
Tim and Chris ?
--
Colin Alston ~ http://syllogism.co.za/
To the world you may be one person, to one person you may
anymore. Free access to
the internet won long ago, it's all about defending your self.
--
Colin Alston ~ http://syllogism.co.za/
To the world you may be one person, to one person you may be the
world ~ Rachel Ann Nunes.
to take action on.
You should not accept SMTP from the Amazon EC2 cloud at all. Amazon
don't intend for anyone to use it as an email platform and tell their
clients to use an external relay.
--
Colin Alston ~ http://syllogism.co.za/
To the world you may be one person, to one person you may
allocation?
--
Colin Alston ~ http://www.karnaugh.za.net/
To the world you may be one person, to one person you may be the
world ~ Rachel Ann Nunes.
___
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
Has anyone else noticed strange things with support.microsoft.com?
If I wget it ('http://support.microsoft.com/') from anywhere, I get an
index.html fine.
If I use lynx, I get gibberish (gzipped content, without a correct header)
If I use Firefox or IE behind some Squid proxies in certain
52 matches
Mail list logo
