Re: 1GE L3 aggregation

Thats some extreme level of unheard discount to get a full MX80 for 3K. On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: > On 17 June 2016 at 16:17, Colton Conor wrote: > > Whats the price piont though? Is that the router he was saying in 15K > range? > > I'm all Shania

Re: 1GE L3 aggregation

Whats the price piont though? Is that the router he was saying in 15K range? On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: > On 17 June 2016 at 15:58, Colton Conor wrote: > > What size FIB/RIB table does that Huawei have? > > It has 25M RIB and 4M FIB. Same Solar NPU as th

Re: 1GE L3 aggregation

What size FIB/RIB table does that Huawei have? On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 5:10 AM, Harald F. Karlsen wrote: > On 16.06.2016 09:51, Saku Ytti wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> I've been bit poking around trying to find reasonable option for 1GE >> L3 full BGP table aggregator. It seems vendors are mostly pushi

Re: Barefoot "Tofino": 6.4 Tbps whitebox switch silicon?

Saku, I agree completely. Isn't this what Arista did? They coded from like 2004 to 2008 before launching EOS using commercial chipsets. You seem to really understand routing software, so I would love to hear your take on Arista EOS. On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: > On 16 Jun

Re: LACP Frames / Level3 Transport

What is performing the LACP? The Level3 transport system for the most part is purley optical, so I don't think it touches LACP. Did you check the hash values? On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Nevin Gonsalves via NANOG wrote: > Hi Nanog-ers, > Hoping someone may have come across a similar issue.

Re: NCS5K?

Tom, Do you actually think that Cisco would sell at NCS 5501 at the price point that Arista is going to sell a 7280R for? Spec wise they are very similar (except Arista has 8 more SFP+ ports and two more 100G ports). Arista is pricing the 7280R inline with Ciscos ASR9001. I doubt Cisco will offer

Re: Arista Routing Solutions

n Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Ryan Woolley wrote: > Colton Conor wrote: > > I know Arista is typically a switch manufacturer, but with their recently > > announced Arista 7500R Series and soon to be announced but already > shipping > > 7280R Series Arista is officially getti

Re: Arista Routing Solutions

Saku, I guess you are right the QFX10002-36Q is probably a better comparison. But let's be honest, Juniper is not going to sell a QFX10002-36Q for less than $20k like Arista will do for a semi- similar box. Even with a high discount (like 90 percent off list), the Juniper QFX10002-36Q at $360k lis

Arista Routing Solutions

NANOG, I know Arista is typically a switch manufacturer, but with their recently announced Arista 7500R Series and soon to be announced but already shipping 7280R Series Arista is officially getting into the routing game. The fixed 1U 7280R Series looks quite impressive. The 7500R series is your t

Re: Software for circuit documentation

You might want to check out http://www.gokadence.com/products-services/circuits/ I have seen a demo of their software, and was impressed. Honestly I would want something with an integrated GIS component. 3-GIS seems to be the leading GIS for telecom. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Manuel Marín

Re: New Switches with Broadcom StrataDNX

internet > edge/router use cases. > > Not sure what other vendors are doing but I doubt others are yet shipping > large table support. > (there's more to it than just the underlying native silicon) > > > cheers, > > lincoln. (l...@arista.com) > > > On Mon

Re: New Switches with Broadcom StrataDNX

As a follow up to this post, it look like the Arista 7500R series has this new chip inside of it. On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Jeff Tantsura wrote: > That's right, logic is in programming chips, not their property. You just > need to know what to program ;-) > > Regards, > Jeff > > > On Jan

Re: mpls switches

How does the ASR 903 compare to the 920? When we got pricing for the ASR 903 it was more expensive than a real ASR 9k router. On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:49 PM, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 13/Apr/16 02:29, Colton Conor wrote: > > Someone told me to check out extreme networks, cis

Re: mpls switches

Someone told me to check out extreme networks, cisco or Ciena for the more cost effective mpls kit. Any advice on which of the three would have the most cost effective 10G MPLS switch? Cisco's MPLS switch is the ASR 920 right? On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:13 PM, George, Wes wrote: > > On 4/12/16,

Telco Systems

Does anyone use Telco Systems Carrier Ethernet & MPLS Aggregation Switches? I have heard good things about them. Overall, the saying is they price 10G ethernet switches at 1G ethernet pricing. It looks like they support MPLS. http://www.telco.com/index.php?page=product-category&category=ethernet-m

Re: mpls switches

Do the Juniper EX switches support MPLS? I know they have models with multiple 10G ports on them. There is also the QFX series. On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Mike wrote: > Hi, > > Im looking to deploy more mpls in my network. I like the Cisco 3600X > series but the low density of 10g ports

Re: HP HSR Routers

I don't see TCAM listed either, but as large as HP is I assume they can afford and use TCAM in their larger routers. On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 1:30 PM, William Herrin wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Colton Conor > wrote: > > I would suggest looking at the HP routi

Re: Juniper MX Sizing

e any stats on that? I would assume faster than a MX104 but slower than the RE-S-1800x4 w/ 16GB RAM. On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > On 14/Mar/16 04:02, Colton Conor wrote: > > > Brad, > > > > Did you ever get the numbers for the MX480? >

Re: Juniper MX Sizing

Brad, Did you ever get the numbers for the MX480? On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Brad Fleming wrote: > We haven’t received the MX480 gear yet (POs just went in about a week > ago). But we tested MX960s with the same RE-S-1800x4 w/ 16GB RAM RIB+FIB > convergence time was roughly 45sec. We never

Re: HP HSR Routers

v4), 100 entries (IPv6) Backplane bandwidth 1024 Gb/s 1024 Gb/s 2048 Gb/s On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Colton Conor wrote: > > Does anyone deploy HP HSR routers for full BGP routing? Looks like they >> have couple of r

HP HSR Routers

Does anyone deploy HP HSR routers for full BGP routing? Looks like they have couple of routers that can hold 4 Million IPv4 routes, and do full BGP routing. I did no even know that HP had routers of this size. I read this post on Reddit, and it said the following: I would suggest looking at the H

Samsung Networks

Does anyone have an American contact for someone in the Samsung Networks carrier division?

Cisco ASR9010 vs Juniper MX960

I would like opinions of the differences between these two platforms if possible. I was going to buy a used Juniper MX960 Router MX960-PREMIUM2-AC-ECM with 2 x RE-S-1800X4-16G and 3 x SCBE-MX-S. Then I was going to load this up with a couple of older DPCE-R-4XGE-XFP 4x10GE DPC Enhanced cards. N

Re: Cable Operator List

Scott, I was able to find the Huawie solution: http://www.huawei.com/ucmf/groups/public/documents/webasset/hw_415387.pdf Looks like its 32x4 capable today, and software upgradeable to DOCSIS 3.1 which is nice. Appears to also have a 10G uplink port on it. Seems like the best solution tech spec wis

Re: Cable Operator List

alita wrote: > Have you looked at Casa Systems? They some smaller density MDU stuff. > > -Steve > > Sent from my iPhone. Please excuse any errors. > > > On Feb 9, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Colton Conor > wrote: > > > > Scott, > > > > Have any idea whi

Re: Cable Operator List

-- > http://twitter.com/kscotthelms > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Colton Conor > wrote: > >> Is a remote MAC+PHY the same thing as a Distributed Converged Cable >> Access Platform (D-CCAP) solution like Huawei is pus

Re: Cable Operator List

ouse wiring > as they support a LOT more management than any of the smaller DSLAMS I've > looked at. > > In this configuration I can easily support 100mbit service on DOCSIS 3, > and my unlimited modems will speedtest all the way to 280mbs. > > > FWIW > > /rh > > O

Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge

I see Cisco and Juniper mentioned here, but what about all the smart NID companies out there? I found these of MEF list: Accedian, Altera, BTI Systems, Ciena (Nasdaq: CIEN ), Cisco (Nasdaq: CSCO ), Cyan, FibroLAN, H

Re: Cable Operator List

ity along the Arris line, skip the C4 and go straight to > the E6000. > > Frank > > -Original Message- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Corbe > Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 8:18 AM > To: Colton Conor > Cc: NANOG > Subject

Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge

Jerome, We use some of the 7360's, but not the Mikrotik. Why not use ALU's CPE devices if using the 7360? On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Jérôme Nicolle wrote: > Hi David, > > Le 02/02/2016 22:03, David Bass a écrit : > > Looking to see what others are using out there as an alternative to a > C

Re: Cable Operator List

CMTS platforms are? On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Scott Helms wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Colton Conor > wrote: > >> Yes, we are in the USA. So based on everyones recommendations, I am going >> to stay far away from EURODOCSIS. I wa

Re: Cable Operator List

Yes, we are in the USA. So based on everyones recommendations, I am going to stay far away from EURODOCSIS. I was told be a vendor that Arris and other USA FCC certified cable modems could easily be flashed to EURODOCIS mode, so I did not think the CPE side was that big of a deal (is that even true

Re: Cable Operator List

they’re upgrading their cable plant to the CBR platform. > > Then the Arris C4, if you have deep pockets, is a modern version of the > BSR: > > http://www.arris.com/products/c4-cmts/ > > > > On Feb 2, 2016, at 9:00 AM, Colton Conor wrote: > > > > Well,

Re: Cable Operator List

MTS. > > Graham Johnston > Network Planner > Westman Communications Group > 204.717.2829 > johnst...@westmancom.com > think green; don't print this email. > > > -Original Message- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Colton Conor >

Re: Cable Operator List

d the http://picodigital.com/product-details.php?ID=miniCMTS200a which seems to retail for under $5000. On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Daniel Corbe wrote: > > > On Feb 2, 2016, at 8:42 AM, Colton Conor wrote: > > > > Are there any mailing lists out there dedicated f

Cable Operator List

Are there any mailing lists out there dedicated for cable/MSO type operators?

Re: Equipment Supporting 2.5gbps and 5gbps

Josh, Which Juniper switch are you referring to that is $102 per 10G port? On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote: > You're buying your switches and optics in the wrong places. > > An SFP+ 10K w/ DOM is running me a little under $34. An SFP+ port runs > me slightly over $102. (Ju

Re: Peering Exchange

> > Bryan Socha > Network Engineer > DigitalOcean > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Colton Conor > wrote: > >> Is there a way to browse a route server at certain exchanges, and see who >> is and is not on the route server? >> >> On Tue, Jan 26

Re: Arista optics

Who are you referring to David? Are you mentioning flexoptix? Is for are are saying I can recode a fiberstore sfp using a flexoptics programmer? On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:28 PM, David Lucey wrote: > They used to lock in, but optics have gotten so competitive that they > aren't pushing it anymore

Re: Peering Exchange

Is there a way to browse a route server at certain exchanges, and see who is and is not on the route server? On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Hugo Slabbert wrote: > On Tue 2016-Jan-26 13:30:41 -0600, Mike Hammett wrote: > > Google or Facebook are exactly who you would want to connect with and I

Peering Exchange

If a service provider or enterprise orders collocation at an Equinix Global Internet Exchange Point, and orders a port on the exchange from Equinix, then what happens? How does a provider actually peer with the peers on the exchange? Lets assume the SP or enterprise already has an ANS, transit fro

Re: Programmable SFP+ Transcievers

Freddy, So are you saying if you order enough from Fiberstore.com they will give you a programmer? That seems like the best solution. On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Frederik Kriewitz wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Colton Conor > wrote: > > What options are out

Re: Programmable SFP+ Transcievers

your own, but not 4X the amount. How does Solid Optics compare on pricing? They don't list them on their website. On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 4:02 AM, t...@pelican.org wrote: > On Monday, 18 January, 2016 19:02, "Colton Conor" > said: > > > What options are out th

Re: New Switches with Broadcom StrataDNX

inecard is a > 36x100G QSFP28 one. > > Juniper has chosen to use their own silicon for most of their dense 100G > platforms, but you’ll see these chips used by pretty much everyone else I > imagine at some point in the next year. > > > > Phil > > -Original Message-

Programmable SFP+ Transcievers

What options are out there for re-programmable SFP and SFP+ transceivers? So far I have found both https://www.flexoptix.net/en/flexbox-v3-transceiver-programmer.html and http://solid-optics.com/tools/multi-fiber-tool/so-multi-fiber-tool-id1768.html Is there anything else out there? Any opinions on

New Switches with Broadcom StrataDNX

Does anyone know when the switching and router vendors will release their new models with the Broadcom BCM88370 and BCM88670 chips? It looks like these chips could be used as a carrier grade router and/or metro E device. More information here: http://www.broadcom.com/press/release.php?id=s902223

Re: GPON vs. GEPON

If you take out "bitrate, split ratio, cross vendor compatibility and purchase price differences" then what else would you like to compare or know? Those would be the major differences I would say. We only deploy GPON here. I would say in a system like GEPON or GPON where a port is shared between u

Re: route converge time

What types of routers are you currently using? On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Baldur Norddahl wrote: > Hi > > I got a network with two routers and two IP transit providers, each with > the full BGP table. Router A is connected to provider A and router B to > provider B. We use MPLS with a L3VP

Re: sfp "computer"?

Which new switches are you talking about Jerry? On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Jerry Jones wrote: > A different approach would be use one of the newer switches from Juniper > and run right on the RE if you have those in your network > > > On Oct 15, 2015, at 9:24 PM, Baldur Norddahl > wrote:

Re: GPON Optical Levels

Here is the link to the attachment as it looks like the list does not allow uploading attachment: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7sFULLCnLvFdllHQUl6dnJfZ00/view?usp=sharing On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Colton Conor wrote: > We are deploying our first GPON network, and are trying to

GPON Optical Levels

We are deploying our first GPON network, and are trying to get a sense of what is a good optical level per ONT. The equipment install guide says the following: Measure the levels of the 1550 dBm and 1490 dBm receive optical inputs using an optical power meter. The input range should be between -2

Re: SNMP - monitoring large number of devices

Check out Science Logic. Their platform is made to scale to these levels. On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:43 AM, Pavel Dimow wrote: > Thank you all for you suggestions, I knew it that NANOG is a perfect place > for those kind of questions. > I will discuss your comments with my colleagues to see what

Re: Branch Location Over The Internet

/www.anexia.at > > Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 Klagenfurt > Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler > Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT > U63216601 > > > > -Original Message- > *From:* Colton Conor

Branch Location Over The Internet

We have an enterprise that has a headquarter office with redundant fiber connections, its own ASN, its own /22 IP block from ARIN, and a couple of gigabit internet connections from multiple providers. The office is taking full BGP routes from tier 1 providers using a Juniper MX80. They are establi

Re: DE-CIX vs Equinix

gt; available... in Equinix. > > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Colton Conor"

Re: DE-CIX vs Equinix

l 22, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Charles Gucker wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Colton Conor > wrote: > > What are the main difference between these two peering companies, > > exchanges, and overall operating model? The market in question would be > > Dallas Texas

Re: [BULK] Verizon exiting California

Word on the street is that Verizon business/enterprise is about to be sold to Centrylink as well. Seems Verizon soon will only be Verizon Wireless. On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Robert Glover wrote: > On 7/30/2015 9:26 AM, Matthew Black wrote: > >> Verizon sent me a letter the other day stat

Re: Verizon exiting California

I would love to see what a copy of the letter they sent out looks like. They are selling all wireline in CA, TX, and FL. So yes, all the products you described. On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Matthew Black wrote: > Verizon sent me a letter the other day stating that they are selling their > l

Re: DOCSIS CMTS Systems

http://www.bectechnologies.net/main/EoCoax2310.shtml (up to 31 endpoints) >> >> Frank >> >> -Original Message- >> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Colton Conor >> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 8:27 AM >> To: NANOG ; S

DOCSIS CMTS Systems

We are servicing more MDU customers that have older buildings. There is no CAT5E installed, so extremely old phone cable or coaxial TV cable seems to be our only inside wire options. There is no easy and inexpensive way to run new cable, so we must deal with what is available. We are very familiar

DE-CIX vs Equinix

What are the main difference between these two peering companies, exchanges, and overall operating model? The market in question would be Dallas Texas where Equinix already has the only established peering exchange with over 100 members, and DE-CIX just announced today that that would also be build

Re: 2.4Ghz 40Mhz 802.11n wifi and Apple Macbook

So assuming you live in a decent sized house/lot, should you really care about squatting all over the entire band? I mean sure I can see my neighbors wifi signals, but they are too weak for me to connect with them. So wouldn't mine be just as weak at their location, so why should I care about using

Re: PPPoE/IPoE, any recommendations for upgrade?

Suspend or shut down a user is easy, just disable their port on the DSLAM or change their port to a VLAN that only allows them to access/pay their bill. Going to PPPoE to IPoE increases the net throughput right? On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Nasser Heidari wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Jun 2015, Mikae

Re: 10Gb CPE

Aren't these Brocade and Juniper solutions just switches? I thought the original poster was asking for a 10G CPE device? On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Cody Grosskopf wrote: > I also used brocade icx series for this. Depending on feature requirements > the juniper ex3300 might be cheaper. > >

Re: 10Gb CPE

Who makes the 7250? On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Brant Ian Stevens < bra...@argentiumsolutions.com> wrote: > Any feedback on the new 7250’s yet? > > > > > On 5/26/15, 3:02 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Chris Lane" < > nanog-boun...@nanog.org on behalf of clane1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >We use Bro

Re: Low Cost 10G Router

d it's got extensive HQoS functionality"? I heard the MX80 was limited on QoS, but never looked into it. On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Bryan Fields wrote: > On 5/19/15 1:22 PM, Colton Conor wrote: > > What options are available for a small, low cost router that has at least >

Re: Low Cost 10G Router

Yep, thats what I meant be ALU 7750 :) On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Cody Grosskopf wrote: > Add Alcatel-Lucent 7750? I have no experience but this list seems to love > them. > > On Wed, May 20, 2015, 9:44 AM Colton Conor wrote: > >> So, from the sounds of it most ar

Re: Low Cost 10G Router

P daemon on the CCR routers is not multi-threaded; it only will use > one core. > > Josh > > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Colton Conor > wrote: > >> So this new $1295 Mikrotik CCR1036-8G-2S+EM has a 36 core Tilera CPU >> with >> 16GB of ram. Each core

Re: Low Cost 10G Router

So, from the sounds of it most are saying for low cost, the way to go would be a software router, which I was trying to avoid. To answer the bandwidth question, we would have three 10G ports with three different carriers and at max push 10Gbps of total traffic to start. I think this leaves me with

Re: Low Cost 10G Router

So this new $1295 Mikrotik CCR1036-8G-2S+EM has a 36 core Tilera CPU with 16GB of ram. Each core is running at 1.2Ghz? I assume that Mikrotik is multicore in software, so why does this box not outperform these intel boxes that everyone is recommending? Is it just a limitation of ports? On Tue,

Re: Low Cost 10G Router

t; > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Colton Conor > wrote: > >> What options are available for a small, low cost router that has at least >> four 10G ports, and can handle full BGP routes? All that I know of are the >> Juniper MX80, and the Brocade CER line. What does

Re: Low Cost 10G Router

12:24 PM, Mehmet Akcin wrote: > How much is "low cost"? > > Mehmet > > > On May 19, 2015, at 10:22, Colton Conor wrote: > > > > What options are available for a small, low cost router that has at least > > four 10G ports, and can handle full BGP ro

Low Cost 10G Router

What options are available for a small, low cost router that has at least four 10G ports, and can handle full BGP routes? All that I know of are the Juniper MX80, and the Brocade CER line. What does Cisco and others have that compete with these two? Any other vendors besides Juniper, Brocade, and C

Huawei and ZTE Routers

The other thread about the Alcatel-Lucent routers has been pleasantly delightful. Our organization used to believe that Juniper, Cisco, and Brocade were the only true vendors for carrier grade routing, but now we are going to throw Alcatel-Lucent into the mix. ZTE and Huawei, the big chinese vendo

Re: Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router (SR)

similar. > > I am not sure why they aren't mentioned that much. I know that they have > been pretty popular in the past couple years. > > We are planning on using 7750 SR-a4's in the future but right now we > mainly have 7750SR7/12s. > > Sent from my iPhone >

Re: Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router (SR)

now and have been pretty happy. > What are you looking to use them for? > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On May 6, 2015, at 5:48 PM, Colton Conor wrote: > > > > I was wondering if anyone was using a Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router > > (SR) in their network? How d

Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router (SR)

I was wondering if anyone was using a Alcatel-Lucent 7750 Service Router (SR) in their network? How does this platform compare the the Cisco ASR, Brocade MLXe, and Juniper MX line?

Re: ADSL Line Extenders

I know a couple of LECs that use these with success: http://actelis.com/actelis-products/broadband-amplifiers/ On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Jean-Francois Mezei < jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca> wrote: > > A friend on a rural DSl association asked about ADSL line extenders. > > A search on Goog

Re: 100Gb/s TOR switch

ort 25/50G Ethernet. > > Phil > ------ > From: Colton Conor > Sent: ‎4/‎8/‎2015 10:01 PM > To: Furst, John-Nicholas > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: 100Gb/s TOR switch > > From which vendors? > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Furst, J

Re: 100Gb/s TOR switch

>From which vendors? On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Furst, John-Nicholas wrote: > If you can wait, you will see the market flooded with 32x100G with the > ability to down-clock to 40g / breakout to 4x10g in the Q3/Q4 timeframe ;) > > > John-Nicholas Furst > Hardware Engineer > > > Office: +1.61

Re: 100Gb/s TOR switch

When will Tomahawk switches be available? On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Marian Ďurkovič wrote: > Wait for switches with BCM Tomahawk ASICs. > > They'll support exactly what you're looking for. > >M. > > > On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 21:01:59 +0200, Piotr wrote > > Hi, > > > > There is something li

Low Cost CWDM or DWDM

What vendors do you recommend for low cost CWDM / DWDM gear? Assume you have a fiber ring of 50 miles of fiber, and want to have POPs evenly spaced around the ring that you want to jump on and off of. Assume you only have 2 fiber strands to work with, but can obtain two more at an additional cost.

Provider to Blend with Level3

We have a network that is single homed with Level3 at this time in Dallas. They already have BGP and their own ASN and IP setup. Who would you recommend for a second provider in Dallas to blend with Level3? Assuming Level3 and this other provider would be the only two in the blend for a long time t

Re: VDSL CPE Mixed Results

So with this 3 line connection, what speeds up and down are you getting? You say 10X10 which I find odd for a 3 line bonded VDSL2 connection. Most always your downstream will be much higher than your upstream on a 868 unit. On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Stetson Blake < stetson.bl...@datayardw

Re: The state of TACACS+

; arbitrary network. > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Colton Conor > wrote: > > > Scott, > > > > Thanks for the response. How do you make sure the failsafe and/or root > > password that is stored in the device incase remote auth fails can't be >

Re: The state of TACACS+

ttp://twitter.com/kscotthelms > > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Colton Conor > wrote: > >> We are able to implement TACAS+. It is my understanding this a fairly old >> protocol, so are you saying there are numerous bugs that still n

Re: The state of TACACS+

We are able to implement TACAS+. It is my understanding this a fairly old protocol, so are you saying there are numerous bugs that still need to be fixed? A question I have is TACAS+ is usually hosted on a server, and networking devices are configured to reach out to the server for authentication.

Re: OT - Verizon/ATT Cell/4G Signal Booster/Repeater

Wilson is the way to go. They have a couple of products not on their website that only certified installers can sell that are even higher powered. Works with all 4 4G carriers at once. On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Ryan Wilkins wrote: > > > > On Dec 15, 2014, at 9:59 PM, Ammar Zuberi wrote: >

Re: DWDM Documentation

What have you found so far? On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 1:15 PM, Roy Hirst wrote: > Replying offline to Theo. Schwer zu finden. > Roy > > *Roy Hirst* | 425-556-5773 | 425-324-0941 cell > XKL LLC | 12020 113th Ave NE, Suite 100 | Kirkland, WA 98034 | USA > > > On 12/4/2014 5:21 AM, Theo Voss wrote: >

Re: Buying IP Bandwidth Across a Peering Exchange

t the cost of the transport back to an peering location. On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Rob Seastrom wrote: > > Colton Conor writes: > > > Some might ask why not get a cross connect to the provider. It is cheaper > > to buy an port on the exchange (which includes the cr

Re: Buying IP Bandwidth Across a Peering Exchange

Well, we would have a BGP router in another town. Then get a wave from a transport provider from the other town to the town that equinix or the peering exchange was located at. The cross connect would go from the transport providers Z location to the port on the exchange. I have confirmed that Equi

Re: Buying IP Bandwidth Across a Peering Exchange

25, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Ammar Zuberi wrote: > Hi Conor, > > I know this is possible since Hurricane Electric does it for IPv6 transit, > however, I'm not sure if it violates any exchange rules or if it's even a > good idea. > > > On 25 Nov 2014, at 10:47 pm, Colton

Buying IP Bandwidth Across a Peering Exchange

I know typically peering exchanges are made for peering traffic between providers, but can you buy IP transit from a provider on an exchange? An example, buy a 10G port on an exchange, peer 5Gbps of traffic with multiple providers on the exchange, and buy 5Gbps of IP transit from others on the exch

Re: Cisco CCNA Training

rse. Something worth > checking out. Don¹t take my word for it, go look for yourself (or have > your group do that). > > Cheers, > > Scott > > -Original Message- > From: Colton Conor > Date: Sunday, November 2, 2014 at 1:02 PM > To: NANOG > Subject:

Re: Tail-F

onitoring > system, really just depends on the scale you need and how much work you > want to put into it. > > Phil > > > > On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Colton Conor >> wrote: >> > Is anyone us

Tail-F

Is anyone using Tail-f software or know anything similar? We are looking for a solution that is vendor agnostic. Can do simple command like show interface so even non-network techs and CSR's can get basic is the port up or down type stats without having to directly login to the network.

Cisco CCNA Training

We have a couple of techs that want to learn cisco and networking in general. What do you recommend for learning and getting certified on Cisco? There seems to be a million different training courses, books, etc out there.

Re: Keeping Track of Data Usage in GB Per Port

otocol_Detail_Record > > > > On 10/15/14, 1:38 PM, "Colton Conor" wrote: > > >So based on the response I have received so far it seems cable was a > >complicated example with service flows involved. What if we are talking > >about something simpler like ke

Re: Keeping Track of Data Usage in GB Per Port

that polls in intervals and takes samples which isn't really accurate right? On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 1:40 PM, wrote: > Folks, use sflow with rrdtool! > > Quite awesome & handy > > On 15/10/2014 20:14, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Oct 2014 13:

Keeping Track of Data Usage in GB Per Port

I see in past news articles that cable companies are inaccurately calculating customers data usage for their online GB of usage per month. My question is how do you properly determine how much traffic in bytes a port passes per month? Is it different if we are talking about an ethernet port on a ci

<    1   2   3   >